In its waning hours, the Bush administration's Interior Department pushed through a measure to allow visitors to national parks and refuges to carry concealed weapons. This is a terrible policy.
Parks and refuges are among the safest places in the country. Crime - especially violent crime - is exceedingly rare in these settings, as are serious attacks by wildlife. Under these circumstances, why in the world would a visitor need or want to carry a handgun? The Supreme Court last year recognized an individual right to keep and bear arms, but it left plenty of room for sensible gun regulations. Such regulations and, yes, restrictions are warranted here.
The Bush rule went into effect Jan. 9, and the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, the National Parks Conservation Association and the Coalition of National Park Service Retirees have asked a D.C. federal judge to put the rule on hold. They ultimately hope to have the measure invalidated, arguing that the Bush administration failed to follow proper legal procedure in evaluating and adopting the rule. Specifically, they claim that federal law required an environmental assessment, which incorporates such factors as public safety and the "human environment."
Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia is likely to hear the matter early next month. She should grant the temporary injunction. If the judge ultimately concludes that procedures were breached, the rule would be thrown out; the Reagan-era rules restricting concealed weapons in the national parks and refuges would once again be in effect.
President Obama has rightly called concealed weapons a menace to public safety. They should not be introduced into some of the most peaceful and pristine public lands in the country.
- Washington Post
Brainerd Dispatch ©2013. All Rights Reserved.