ST. PAUL — A cadre of Minnesota legislators opposed to putting public money into a deal for a new Vikings stadium acknowledged Thursday they’d let the team flee the state rather than let themselves be strong-armed into cutting a deal at any price.
Minneapolis Mayor R.T. Rybak, meanwhile, laid out two funding options and three possible sites in a bid to keep the team from bolting from the city to the suburbs — or beyond. His plan relies on new sales and lodging taxes or proceeds from a potential downtown casino.
All of it comes as Democratic Gov. Mark Dayton’s self-imposed deadline for crafting a stadium plan approaches. He hopes to call lawmakers into special session before Thanksgiving to vote on hundreds of millions of dollars in public subsidies.
The Vikings have four games remaining on their Metrodome lease, and have made it clear that they won’t re-up without assurances that a new stadium will get built. Team owner Zygi Wilf has stopped short of threatening to leave the state, but other cities craving an NFL franchise are paying attention.
“We don’t want them to leave, but if they’re going to leave I guess that is going to happen,” said Sen. David Hann, a Republican who led a news conference by a bipartisan group of lawmakers fighting efforts to expand gambling to help pay for a new stadium. The lawmakers said their opposition extends to using all forms of taxpayer money.
Added GOP Sen. Dave Thompson, an assistant majority leader: “I have to do what I believe is right. I wouldn’t be making the Vikings leave. It would be the ownership of the Vikings making a decision to leave if they do and the NFL allowing them because they don’t get what they want.”
Wilf prefers a suburban Ramsey County site that could result in a price tag topping $1 billion, with half or more coming from state and local revenue streams. The team reiterated Thursday that it regards the Arden Hills site as “the ideal stadium site for the state, the Vikings and our fans.”
The statement came in reaction to Rybak’s announcement of three stadium sites in Minneapolis, including one on the current Metrodome property. The project’s costs would range from $895 million to about $1.05 billion.
Under Rybak’s plan, the city would shoulder as much as $300 million of the overall cost. Unless lawmakers go the casino route, the sales tax would rise 0.35 percentage point — putting it above 8 percent overall on standard purchases in the city — and an extra 1 percent tax would be tacked onto hotel bills.
The mayor’s proposal also calls for a $150 million renovation of Target Center, where the NBA’s Timberwolves play. As a sweetener, Rybak is playing up the possibility of modest property tax relief once Target Center’s debt is restructured.
Rybak said he’s confident he can round up the votes on his city council despite a cool reaction to trial balloons he floated earlier. He’d also need to win over state lawmakers because they would have to allow Minneapolis to impose the added taxes and let it forgo a public referendum.
“Nobody is going to walk into this Capitol with an idea that will be met with palm branches,” Rybak said, adding, “The reality is every single idea here is going be met with very tough politics and people at the local and state level sticking their necks out. So I’m sticking my neck out.”
For his part, Dayton is remaining neutral on where a stadium should be built. Early Thursday, he got an aerial tour of the Arden Hills site, a former Army munitions plant.
Republicans who run the Legislature are also resisting the idea of new taxes. Some want the state to siphon money from a cultural legacy account fed by constitutionally dedicated sales tax proceeds; they argue the team is a critical part of the state’s heritage. Dayton said Wednesday he was open to the idea, but arts groups and others are aligning to fight it.
Gambling money is also a possibility.
One option in the Minneapolis plan depends on a downtown casino that developers have promoting for months. Rybak wants the state to sell a $20 million license and take 5 percent of gross revenues, putting that money toward the Vikings stadium.
Minnesota is home to several tribal casinos but has long resisted allowing private casino developers into the mix. It’s not the only gambling option in play. Other stadium supporters are pushing to allow slot machines at horse tracks or electronic gambling terminals in bars.
The added focus on gambling as a funding method to back stadium bonds brought an eclectic mix of opponents from both political parties together. They said the money stream is too risky, depends too heavily on problem gamblers and carries social costs such as higher crime.
“We really have the marriage of two bad ideas here: public funding for a stadium and that funding coming from gambling,” said Democratic Rep. Frank Hornstein.
Stadium backer Cory Merrifield of SavetheVikes.org said the gambling opponents were off the mark.
“You can walk into any gas station in Minnesota and gamble via scratch-offs. You can turn on any computer anywhere in Minnesota and gamble online via poker, fantasy football and online sports books,” he said.
Dayton and GOP leaders are due to meet privately Friday to discuss the next steps.



Comments (12)
Add commentFine. Dig In. Vikes are a Midwest Treasure.
Living in the Twin Cities, I've heard many items. No, let them go, Yes, keep them here. However, overall, keep them here is more solid.
We have to look at the future, and not the present.
Wins and losses will come and go.
We don't want the Vikes to come and go.
Think about our kids and grand kids and great grand kids.
That's what this is all about. Continue of the fun.
Many folks want share their current feelings. However, this decision is enduring. Don't forget this.
I cannot nor my spouse decide our children or grandchildren s future.
Short sighted is a curse. 20/20 vision, how many times have folks quoted this? Too often.
Sayonara Vikes
Already over taxed in this state. Zygi has plenty of cash as well as other billionaires to throw around. Let them pay for it. I can't afford any more taxes to fund a country club stadium for a pack of over paid primadonna losers. Stay in the Dome or good riddance.
Mn. teams
It would be interesting to know just how much the Vikings, Twins and other teams actually contribute to the states economy in tax revenue on the players salary. Does Zygi pay Mn. state income tax on his billions and if so how much. Why aren't these organizations giving us exact figures on what they do contribute?
legislators
No gambling, higher taxes, lower taxes, sales tax, not this, and not that. What the heck do the legislators want? I really do think they don't have a clue, all of them. They haven't gotten anything done the past 10 years. If any of us worked for a business and did this kind of job, we wouldn't be around any longer! Think long term, not wants good for my election coming up next year.
Zygi does have money
I agree "Zygi has plenty of cash as well as other billionaires to throw around." But the quote "Let them pay for it." is ambigious. They are rich and could afford a new stadium, but they figure why should they pay for it if someone else will. If the "taxpayers" in Minnesota will not pay for it then they will have "someone" in California paying for it. A football team does generate a lot of income to any state. Plus we have the players spending money here. The businesses will lose some money if the Vikings leave, thus the Taxpayers will be paying more for taxes (someone has to pick up the slack). So it is to agree to pay a little now and keep the Vikings or lose the Vikings and pay more for taxes later.
But ...
... think how much safer our roads will be at night without Viking players weaving around !!!
Post
Sorry Eyolf...sometimes our filter picks stuff that looks like it might be spam or advertising. Apparently you might have a gift with online advertising lingo ;)
I reposted it. Have a good weekend.
Sarah Nelson
Online Content Editor
Answer
Here is a post in another thread from johnbrown ,
Income Taxes collected by the state of Minnesota directly related to the Minnesota Vikings is in excess of $10 million per year. It has been increasing around 8% annually since 1994.
The home state of the Vikings for the next 30 years is looking at Billions of dollars in direct income tax revenue.
That's not including the millions annually raised by various Vikings related foundations. That is not including the millions annually raised by sales taxes, corporate income taxes or taxes paid by any other industries bolstered by the presence of a big league team.
Also of note, if the state decides to invest $300 million for infrastructure they have already received guarantees of hundreds of millions of dollars in matching funds for economic development.
Now after reading this can anyone answer this to me. What does the state and citizen of the state gain by losing the vikings?