Surprised
I was totally surprised to see the Dispatch recommend we all vote for another scam referendum. In 45 years that I know of, they’ve never recommended a “no,” even on some ridiculous referendums. Someday maybe they could actually look at both sides of an issue so everyone could make an informed decision rather than a political one.
Ban leaf burning?
When is Baxter going to ban leaf burning? We have one neighbor burning leaves and our entire neighborhood is filled with blue acrid smoke. It makes it impossible to be outside and enjoy this beautiful fall day we are having.
They don’t have a clue
I get so tired of the uninformed spouting off about matters they don’t understand. And they are being given a public forum for spewing forth inaccuracies. The school district does not own the land that the school farm sits on. It was granted to them in a lifelong lease for $1 a year by a family in the form of a gift-type scenario. So anyone who says the school district can sell the school farm to get out of financial debt doesn’t have a clue about which they speak.
Vox Pop, voice of the people, publishes Sundays, Tuesdays and Thursdays. Submissions are limited to 100 words. To phone in a comment, call (218) 855-5888 and leave a message. To e-mail a comment, write to voxpop@brainerddispatch.com. Comments, which must meet the newspaper’s standards of fairness and good taste, may be edited for clarity, length and libel.



Comments (39)
Add commentA SCAM??
A Scam? You have got to be kidding me!!! You know how a person could make a informed decision on the referendum? Go help out in one of the elementary classrooms for a day and you will see how the referendum money is much needed. I was in the classrooms, as a volunteer, before and after the failed referendum last time around and I saw firsthand the impact it had in the schools. The kids are packed into the school, like sardines, at the one school I help out at. I can't imagine what things will be like if the referendum fails again.
I am a well informed voter and I will be voting yes to both questions on the ballot.
I would like any evidence of a scam...
I have mentioned this before .... I would welcome any evidence of a scam.... otherwise, such a charge is an emotional comment that bears no fruitful gain.
Vote Yes Yes!
Schools are crumbling and overcrowded. Lowell school is so crowded that that the 4th graders have their classes on the 2nd floor and their lockers in the basement.
I see many people comparing what the kids have now to what they had when they were in school 20, 30, 40 or more years ago. Brainerd children are not competing against what you had when you were a kid. They are not competing against what kids in Alabama have. They are competing against kids from wealthy school districts in the US AND kids from India, China, etc... We need to do what we can to prepare our kids to excel in the globally competitive situation that they are facing.
Remember, the kids you are supporting today will be voters and tax payers in the not too distant future. Everyone wins if they are well prepared and effective members of the economy. They might even vote to keep funding your social security and medicare ;)
I will be voting Yes Yes
After studying all the facts. My tax may go up $ 5. a month and I can afford that - and I'm not rich.
Arguments against this are often directed toward teachers (unions) but in a 'business' like education much of the money has to go toward staffing. We are not producing widgets here.
My kids got a fine education here and they are both gainfully employed in highly skilled jobs that pay well. I'm willing to give other kids what my kids had. Comments about one room schools are irrelevant. Our kids need different skills than in the 1950's.
The other whine is about Forestview Middle School. That was a BOND issue, not a levy. Two totally different revene streams.
Forestview is nice, but not a palace compared to other schools I have been in around the state with population bases similar to here. Check out Bemidji's new complex. FVMS looks shabby compared to that.
Why?
Johngalt wants us to vote no on his say so. Tell us more, John.
Why no-no? List your reasons and back them up with facts. "Because I said so" is fruitless. "Because someone told me" does not bear up.
I understand the frustration and anger at the tax bills lately. I see it in my own obligations. Gov. Ventura gave us a whole new way to pay car license tabs -- and it cost us better roads. I've seen my property taxes go up, I pay more fees on several items from fishing licenses to taxes on tickets to athletic events and cultural events in the cities. Its all there. The frustration you and I share, in many ways, is justified.
The difference is that school funding is so much based on local voting these days. You don't get to vote on who gets road contracts. You don't get to vote on county landfill use and policy. Unfortunately, that makes the schools a great target for the anger --- and its concentrated anger since we are not able to so directly vote on tax policies except in school issues.
Use your anger to contact our lawmakers -- whether it be school board, county commissioner, city officers, senators, representatives --- tell them your feelings. That's where it will field better results.
zach
My question is why does any one have to give any one a reason? Galt is under no obligation to answer. I will vote no because I personally think the school board is not being honest about their figures, we don't know how the tax rates will be affected next year with the whole homestead credit being readjusted, and the school system spends money like it is water. Aside from the fact, I observed a good number of these "students" and I wouldn't give you a plug nickel for half of them.
perhaps the new Optimist Club?
galt and pdnet are so bitter and angry, about everything
is there any joy in your lives?
p.s. galt - Did you see Obama passed his physical with flying colors? SMOKE FREE ! lots of us smoked when we were young and foolish. I didn't post a pic of GWB drinking or doing drugs in his early life while he was President.
pdnet15,
Let me see if this is correct? You are voting no because: 1. The School Board is not being honest with you because they do not know what your homestead taxes will be. Well, the figures are from Crow Wing County - not the School Board. Homestead Credit has nothing to do with the School Board. 2. You think the School System spend money like water. (Are you talking all schools or just Brainerd?). How involved are you in the school system? Do you know what is going on? 3. You wouldn't give a plug nickel for half of these "students". - How about the other half? Why don't you think these student deserve a good education?
Get informed and you will vote "YES - "YES"
I am informed and I I'll be voting yes no
Maybe the homestead tax credit has nothing to do with the schools, but it has EVERYTHING to do with my pocketbook. More money will be leaving it. How can the school or anyone taxing you more and more and more think its a good idea?
Nobody seems to know what's going to happen when the homestead thing goes away, but I will bet it will up be a 100% increases on your property taxes. Now add on more taxes by this referendum and we should all be happy when we don't have money for things right?
Yup, this is a good investment on our future, but what if we don't have one because nobody has any disposable income to climb this area out of its slump?
As for blowing money by this school district, one look at forestview is all you need for a reminder of wasteful spending.
I will also be voting yes no
I realize this an effective reduction in funding due to inflation, however, if the company I work for and almost every other industry and government entity has had to figure out how to do more with less over the last 3 or so years, why should the school district be any different? If this promotes innovators and forward thinkers in the education business to come up with a more efficient way to educate our kids, is that such a bad thing?
Not in the district, but....
Well, I don't even live in the district, but I got two mailers about the referendum. So take that for whatever its worth. In my humble opinion, it's time for all public funded organizations from the federal government on down to the local school level to start realizing that there is not an endless pit of money out here. I know of too many people who have either lost jobs or taken pay cuts (while their price of insurance goes up) for any type of tax increase to be justified.
Our Government is full of wasted money.
Our Government is full of wasted money. I do agree. I remember a few years ago the school sent notes home with the children stating they had to wear a heavy shirt to school. Because the State of Minnesota wanted the the heat turned down in every school - but they would not turn the heat down for the prisoners. I think if you want to talk about wasted money - this would be an excellent place to start. Some of the Federal Prisons are beautiful inside. But then these prisoners deserve to have the most up-to-date computers, TVs, (with internet and cable). They need airconditioning - unlike the students. Their teachers are paid three times as much (but then these are college professors). The prisoners even get all their meals free plus free medical and dental. Here we can cut money.
"Schools are crumbling and overcrowded." ???
I'm not in the Brainerd District but if it's an excess levy referendum how is that going to help the crumbling and overcrowding?
@llr
bstinger just does not have a clue what they are talking about. They fall in the group of people who need to inform themselves of the facts.
Even halfwits know "Bonds are for Building, Levies are for Learning."
Because you're here, pdnet15.... and i-disagree-with-dems
At least you give a few reasons why you are voting NO NO.... and that is what this kind of forum is for. At its best, the healthful exchange of opinions is when this sort of communication is at its best. You gave your reasons, and now we can clearly discuss them. You're right, no one need truly explain their statement, but then they contribute nothing to the conversation and waster our time and his. That's why I challenged johngalt to list his reasons like you did.
And i ask YOU specifically, WHERE does the school district spend money like water? Where is your proof that the school board is not being honest? Which of the six have lied? Have you caught them in a lie? Again, when you make these statements without anything to back them up, you might as well as not even list them.
You're right; we don't know how the property taxes will come out.... and there is no way the school board could have anticipated this when they started considering a referendum vote. I have stated earlier that it is rather standard that boards are looking at least 6 months in advance -- and I have been told that they may start considering such a need as much 2 years ahead of time. No one sees into the future. There's no way they could know what's coming up ...somewhere along the way, decision time comes.
For I-disagree-with-dems.... are you seriously going to vote on a BET? Wow. You are another one who apparently can see into the future better than the rest of us....
for johnbrown
You claim bstinger has his facts wrong. Go through them one by one and show us ...and namecalling is certainly of no use.
Ignorance galt
again, generalizations and downright untruths....typical
@zachnos
bstinger needs to educate him or herself on the differences between a levy and a bond. This levy passing or failing will have no difference on the crumbling infrastructure the school district operates.
That is the only thing I said.
I'm glad they are voting yes-yes, my opinion is yes-yes. Just because I agree with their voting stance doesn't mean they have a clue. Take you for example, you have been saying a whole lot of nothing trying to engage no voters on these forums for awhile now. Am I proud to be of the same ilk as you? No, but I am proud to have an informed decision regarding the referendum vote coming up. That is something that you, despite all the keystrokes you have expended in the past couple week, have not conveyed.
Obama's ratings are going up galt
and the GOP front runners are ..well, stumbling.. amazing that the GOP could not get candidates in line who could engage the public and not fight among themselves.
I'm rathar cheerful about that. Watching the GOP debates is sort of entertaining and good for some giggles. Like the last debate when a commentator, when asked who 'won' the debate said, "Obama." I'm still giggling about that.
zachnos, ok... minnesnowda what poll?
I listen to those that know what the loss of our homestead tax exemption is going to do, they say on the average it is going to double. In my case, it should be around 45%. So I am voting yes, no.
Since the schools are a major benefactor in state taxes, I will guess schools will get much of that 100% on average increase of the local property taxes.
Minnesnowda, the report I seen says Generic Republican 47%, Obama 42%. That is a 1 point decrease for Obama since last week. With that said, most genius pollsters will say that the 11% that are not sure which way they will vote generally will go for the challenger, not incumbant So that is 58-42, which equals a HUGE landslide.
I repeat, johngalt.....
All your items may be true, but you have not produced a single document that backs it up .... nothing. You've said nothing new here.
1.) Who or what says the children are so poorly educated? Do you have a research article? A document of some sort?
2.) Who says the schools are poorly managed? Are you comparing it to other schools? Are you comparing it to some other business entity?
3.) How do you figure the schools are run by the teachers union? Which teacher union officials are making the decisions? Specifically, who are the teacher union officals right here in Brainerd who are calling the shots? Who does Superintendent Razidlo answer to in the teacher union?
There, you have your questions, johngalt.
Quinnipiac Poll just released today
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1295.xml?ReleaseID=1669
November 2, 2011 - American Voters Like Obama Better This Week, Quinnipiac University National Poll Finds; Cain And Gingrich Up As Romney Stalls And Perry Fades.
Thanks for voting YES on the first part of the ballot. A no-no vote win will be devastating to our school district.
i will be voting yes-yes
@john galt: you say the students in ISD 181 are poorly educated and are being indoctrinated with a liberal agenda. Have you checked out the curriculum? Every grade maps them out in detail month by month. The teachers for my kids have shared them at every parent conference I've attended, and they are included in class syllabi. I see alot of Math, English, History, Science and Technology being taught. Haven't ever seen evidence of the "liberal agenda" in homework, class notes or on the sylabus, which details what will be studied.
Students are poorly educated? ISD 181 still betters the state average in testing, and compares favorably to other schools in our region. Yet we do this on LESS per student than any other school in our conference. In fact, we invest less per student than any other school our size in outstate Minnesota.
That can't sustain classrooms for long. Step into any classroom in ISD 181 (I have) and you'll find far too many students (30-35 at Forestview, 30-36 at BHS), old textbooks, and schools that aren't able to keep up with the technology our kids will need to be successful when they enter the workforce.
Galt hates it when kids are taught to think for themselves
when they could stay home and watch Faux News for the 'real truth.' Galt thinks the Dispatch is liberal media because they present both sides to every story.
Once again...
If passed, how/where will it be spent? Can any of the Yes/Yes crowd give a breakdown on where this money will be spent? Operations can be a broad area. Just like the debate on spending Legacy money. I hope it doesn't go to artificial turf for the football field.
from a sheet I have:
21st century technology. Programming. Preserving current class sizes. Transportation and keeping elective courses.
This is all outlined in the mailings I got and the website.
There will be staff and class cuts if this is not passed. They are not kidding.
The No-No people need to remember that a Yes vote on the first question will not change anything - it will 'maintain' what we have now. $199. a year for each student.
The state average for an operating levy is $ 936. per student.
A Yes vote on the 2nd question will give the district an additional $ 200. (for 5 years only, hopefully the state will then begin to fund schools fairly as promised.) So we would be at nearly $ 400. (about what Alexandria operates on.)
I know the levy won't help the crumbling schools...
but it can help overcrowding. There are simply more students in Lowell than the building was meant to handle. Those choices were made when they closed buildings due to the last levy failure. If the money was there to keep other schools open and have more teachers that problem would be solved.
Please correct me
if I am wrong, but didn't they miraculously find $2 million in the school fund after the last levy failed?
pdnet - I believe it was $1.7
pdnet - I believe it was $1.7 million.
public meetings - anyone attend one?
The one I attended a very conservative area business man that ISD 181 had opened their books to for help commented that the levy was needed. That convinced me.
There was a lot of discussion face to face at the meeting I attended. Sadly, these public forums have been shunned by those looking for answers.