Public employees are finding it difficult to convince local, state and federal government that their higher pay and benefits that far outweighs those given to employees in the private sector are fair. Why is this?
Perhaps it’s because union bigwigs have been pumping municipal, state and federal officials for bigger and more costly compensation packages — especially retirement benefits for employees that have served more than 20 years.
Is it the fault of the public employee? The answer is yes and no. Yes, in that they have threatened walkouts and strikes even when their contract contains a no-strike clause. And, no, usually the union heads are the ones threatening strikes and government shutdowns.
So what’s the big deal? Well, the big deal is the number of public employees that are taking retirement packages at or near what they were making as a full-time employee. With an economic downturn that is pressing all levels of government to the tipping point there must be some compromise. Some cities, especially in states that are facing extreme shartfalls due to declining tax income, will be forced into bankruptcy or forced to cut benefits. Lump in the housing bubble bursting, the unemployment numbers and the ever receding tax base and there are those governments that are near collapse or have collapsed.
Is there a solution? Of course, but short of doing what Gov. Scott Walker did in Wisconsin to save that neighboring state from fiscal meltdown, the medicine is not going to taste good.
Concessions are never welcome among workers that are faced with the realities of a governmental entities’ shortfall. However, how many private company workers have had the brutal reality of being laid off, losing one’s 401k, or worse, finding that the pension funds offered by the company are no longer being offered. So then, how is it that public employees are exempt from such realities? In fact, they are not. Even if concessions have not been made in those communities facing difficult times, even public union leaders will be faced with the fact that money coming into the governmental entity has slowed, in some cases to a trickle of what it was when times were booming.
We all have had to make concessions. Now is the time for public employees to stand along side private employees and allow for rollbacks of their packages. If not, look for more communities, states, and eventually the federal government to slide into insolvency. (In fact, the United States government is now incapable of serving the tremendous debt that some financial experts peg in excess of $100 trillion.)
Let’s work together to bring public employee compensation and retirement packages into line with private sector employees. Who knows, maybe we can all survive the ugly economic disaster that is looming over our nation’s cities, states and even our federal government.
—Keith Hansen



Comments (17)
Add commentrtw
right to work would put everyone on a level playing field and this indecent public pay & bennies are history!the nation is bankrupt and the future public retirements are NOT paid for-guess who will pay in the future-private workers!
Hey Keith
CEO watch http://www.startribune.com/business/142988065.html
You know many public employees with this kind of deal???? I didn't think so.
Itter....So what. Are you
Itter....So what. Are you jealous?
Of course he is
The rabble is getting all worked up to try to steal everyone elses goods.
Can someone explain this?
A 56 yr old friend of mine who retired jan 1st. He was a Mn State Trooper & he recieves 103% of his wages. Does something need a little fixing here??
$
It's not a matter of jealousy, but how can the private
sector keep paying more and more and earn less.
It is simple math. Look at CA and then to our future.
Hopefully, some people will start to look at the future
and what is sustainable.
Classic modern example: Greece
Any one want to join?
We all do better when we all do better.
Why should we try to bring public employee compensation and retirement packages down to the insufficient level of private employee compensation and retirement packages? It would be better for everyone if private sector employees (like me) had access to the same wages and benefits as public sector employees. We need to make sure that everyone has the opportunity to earn a living wage and pay taxes on what they earn.
According to the trickle-downers,
we only do better when they do better. That's been going on for 40 years. Are we better off now?
GetaGrip, FNB, OldFarm Boy
You don't think a State Trooper deserves a good retirement after dealing with people like you all their lives???
What mirror are
you breathing on?
The sad thing is
None of you would have the guts to confront a "public employee" face to face......
unions
Don't like 'em? I hope non of the union critics on here are earning prevailing wage . . . . . seeing how this is determined through wages of organized labor.
Right to Work = good bye prevailing wage = less income for most Minnesotans = right to be poor.
ither,
wrong. I have and will again. I had and have relatives that are "public employees" , the problem is that the clear majority hates your union and the slackers that it allows to get paid the equal wage for slothful work ethics. smartguy, sorry, I'm one of the 99% your bootlickers hate. After I helped boot a worthless union out of our company I ended up salaried and never looked back. You goofs keep posting your terrorist rants about the terrible working conditions and low wages coming back if there are no unions and ignore the fact that your hero wants to make everyone work for nothing but what the government wants to give them.
unions+ Obama+liberals=slaves!
What local are you the BA for?
Scroll down to "I'll never forget it."
http://brainerddispatch.com/opinion/open-forum/2012-03-20/right-freeload
I didn't feel like typing it again....Unions suck!
muskyslayr
I've seen this exact thing in both union and nonunion shops. Was she getting paid to do the job? Not trying to sound like I don't understand her plight, but I've seen many employees over the years getting others to do their work for them. This then is more like a management problem assigning her to the task. Or should we just keep em in the kitchen? Maybe its harsh but equal pay means equal work.
Just out of curiosity, if it bothered you so much, why didn't you go help or was it not your job and you weren't getting paid to do it for her like those two guys, too?
not-ditter-done
I just used my Bud as an example. My question was does there need to be a little fixing here? All we are doing here is really going to cost our Grandkids right?? Now in my book that is not right. As for you telling me I dont have the guts. I guess you dont know me very well then.