Minnesota’s timberwolves were once as rare as a win by the 2011 Minnesota Timberwolves. However, they, like the Minnesota pro basketball team, have made a comeback in the Gopher state.
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) estimate the four-legged timberwolf population to be at or near 3,200.
In 2012, persons interested in stalking and bagging a timberwolf will have the opportunity. A proposed season would coincide with the start of the state’s rifle deer hunting season. DNR officials are suggesting as many as 6,000 permits to harvest one of the marauding canines could be available to hunters.
In addition to hunting, trappers will also be issued permits to trap the elusive creature in the state.
The bill establishing a hunting season was authored by our own Sen. Paul Gazelka, R-Brainerd, who stated that the wolf season would open “no later than the first day of the 2012 firearms deer hunting season.”
When the four-legged predator was put on the endangered species list in 1974, opponents, mostly farmers living the the wolf’s primary range in Minnesota, said wolves would devastate their herds. A compensation plan was worked out for farmers who sustained losses due to wolf kills.
The gray wolf populations in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin have recovered from near extinction. As a result the wolf was be removed from the endangered species list, an MSNBC report stated in December of 2011. “Citing a ‘robust, self-sustaining wolf population’ in those states (Minnesota, Wisconsin and Michigan), the (U.S.) Fish and Wildlife Service finalized a proposal first made last May.”
Of course the timberwolf hunting season has its critics. Even the popular U.S. senator from Minnesota Amy Klobuchar received criticism when she stated to a “leading hunting lobby group” that she led the effort to get the wolf off the federal endangered species list and under state control.
A comment in the Star Tribune suggests that hunting the wolf is a mistake. The readers quoted from “A Sand County Almanac” published in 1949 by Aldo Leopold: “We reached the old wolf in time to watch a fierce green fire dying in her eyes. I realized then, and have known ever since, that there was something new to me in those eyes—something known only to her and to the mountain. I was young then, and full of trigger-itch; I thought that because fewer wolves meant more deer, that no wolves would mean hunters’ paradise. But after seeing the green fire die, I sensed that neither the wolf nor the mountain agreed with such a view.”
Whether one lines up with Leopold or with the proponents of the 2012 Minnesota timberwolf hunting season, everyone should bear in mind that the wolf is not scampering around neighborhoods like its primary food source, the whitetailed deer. He is a solitary animal. He hunts to survive. He would rather remain in the deepest cedar swamp of northern Minnesota than venture into a population center.
One thing is certain: man was instrumental in preserving this magnificant animal from extinction, and if necessary, man will have the intelligence to curb the hunting of the wolf if needed in the future.
—Keith Hansen



Comments (7)
Add commentIf there are 3200 wolves
why would you have 6000 permits? Are you trying to wipe them out in one season?
pdnet
I was going to ask the same thing. Even supposing HALF of the people who received a permit got a wolf, the population would be decimated. If a quarter of the people getting permits got a wolf than HALF of the current population would be gone in one season.
What if hunters are more successful than they are being given credit for? Is this how we want to manage our wolf population in their first year off the endangered list?
Why not start with a small number of permits in specific zones (that have been shown to be population intense) and see what the ratio of permits to kills is? Caution for the first year would be wise, I think.
wolf hunting
I belive when 400 are trapped or shot then the season is over
eyolf, ask those out west when entire herds of elk are killed
Leopold was a conservationist. Be believed in wildlife control.
When wolves are controlled, survival of the fittest can happen. However with the state of wolves in this county, even the fittest are killed.
You may or may not believe this, but wolves kill not only to eat but for fun. I have seen many of kills where they were killed and nothing was eaten.
Then you have the many herds of elk that have been completely killed off by wolves. That really makes good hunting for those wanting to bag an elk.
Northern Minnesota, Wisconsin and UP Michigan have had huge increases of wolves and huge decreases of deer and moose. In fact, in Wisconsin the planted elk herd has not increased in size due to wolves and the WIDNR has admitted this.
Here's an idea...
Here's an off the wall idea. We have hunting seasons to control and manage populations, right? Well, if the wolves are doing a good job of decreasing the deer, elk, moose population, and that is competing with the human's hunting season for these animals, then maybe we need to decrease the permits issued or the hunting seasons for humans to hunt elk, deer and moose. If human hunting isn't needed to control the population, then perhaps we should leave it to nature so it is about "survival of the fittest." There is absolutely NOTHING about hunting with a gun that promotes natural selection. A wolf can't catch and bring down the biggest, fastest, healthiest member of the herd, nor will he try. Instead, the pack with seek out the slowest, weakest, oldest, or otherwise most vulnerable. But a high powered rifle with a scope isn't as picky, and the biggest and strongest makes a nice trophy.
Just saying...maybe man needs to step back and let Mother Nature sort it out. See if the wolf and deer populations can strike a balance on their own. Of course, no one who likes to hunt deer would agree with that because we would be cutting into their fun.
If the wolves or deer populations run rampant (such as deer living in your yard or wolves eating your children) than we definitely need to step in. But maybe instead of more wolf permits, we just need to issue fewer deer permits.
wolves
OkeyDokey If it weren"t for hunting license, the wild life would be out of control ,The money helps keep everything manageable. so that one species dosn"t wipe out the other.