The well-intended effort on the part of three seasoned political leaders to end Minnesota’s government shutdown seems doomed from the start.
A bipartisan commission’s ideas of how to fix the structural problems of Minnesota’s finances might have been useful at the outset of this legislative session but it’s too late in the game to be a factor now. It’s crunch time and the only people who can resolve this mess are the principal negotiators, Gov. Mark Dayton, House Speaker Kurt Zellers and Senate Majority Leader Amy Koch.
Former Vice President Walter Mondale, former Republican Minnesota Gov. Arne Carlson and former Republican U.S. Sen. David Durenberger, lent their names to the establishment of an ad hoc budget group made up of respected lawmakers and business people, but oddly, won’t serve on the panel themselves.
As the shutdown enters its second week we can’t afford to turn a deaf ear to any reasonable plan, but it’s unlikely our elected officials — particularly the Republicans — will pay much heed to the Mondale-Carlson-Durenberger group. Carlson, the independent-minded, two-term Republican governor was never a favorite of his party’s activists and his party has grown considerably more conservative since his tenure in the 1990s. Frankly, after supporting Barack Obama for president and the Independent Party’s Tom Horner for governor in 2010, Carlson probably couldn’t be elected precinct chair in the GOP.
The very least we can expect of our political leaders is that they “do no harm” to the people they govern. Republican leaders and the governor have violated this dictum by their stubbornness and failure to compromise. They got Minnesotans into this mess and it’s up to them to get us out.



Comments (7)
Add commentThank You Dispatch
in Senator Gazelka's Guest Editorial he implies it is ALL Governor Dayton's 'fault.'
Interesting the voters elected Gov. Dayton KNOWING he was saying he would increase taxes on the rich, while also electing a legislature committed to Grover Norquist's pledge of no taxes.
That put MN in a real bind. Dayton has come down several times with his budget, the GOP has not allowed any new revenue, oh...well, like T Paw, a 'fee' is not a 'tax?'
That's just dishonest.
Snowda, A fee is a use tax,
Snowda,
A fee is a use tax, and as such, is very fair.
no new taxes
but of course property taxes have gone through the roof (is that a pun?) since the no new taxes pledge crew....it feels like a tax to me and I believe property taxes are one of the most regressive taxes (not fair.) I just wish we could get some honest language about taxes. Fees ARE taxes. Not that I am against all of them, but call it what it is.
"I believe property taxes are
"I believe property taxes are one of the most regressive taxes (not fair.)"
Why? They are based on the value of your property.
Carlson couldn't get elected?
Arnie was booed off the stage by his own party while he was still acting as governor!
His crime was lack of support for focusing much of the party's energy on abortion restrictions.
His move to not take part in his groups proposal was wise, and no doubt designed to minimize the chances the republican party would discount the group immediately.
Sadly, they ended up doing so anyway, yet continue to refuse to lead by refusing any tax increase and insisting on such party platform goals as abortion restrictions, redistricting that favors them, stem cell bans, shifting the burden to the future with accounting gimmicks and shifts in payment dates...and more.
I think both sides fail to realize that the election results were driven by dissatisfaction with exactly this type of behavior.
At least Dayton campaigned honestly on his desire to increase taxes on the wealthiest 2%--and did just that.
Republicans said nothing about holding us hostage to abortion restrictions, stem cell bans, and their other measures designed to favor the party bigwigs, NOT the people of the state.
property taxes
the point is, maybe I can pay them and am glad to have services, but what about people who have lost their jobs, etc?
should they also lose their house?
Of course not, Snowda. But
Of course not, Snowda. But it usaully take quite some time (years) before the city will take possession. Most will lose their house to the bank, long before that ever happens.
But that still doesn't expain why they are SO regressive. Please do explain.