Obama's budget | BrainerdDispatch.com | Brainerd, Minnesota

Obama's budget

Posted: February 14, 2012 - 5:25pm

No budget can be judged in isolation. The baseline question is: compared to what?

Republicans will make much of President Barack Obama’s failure to fulfill his promise to cut the deficit in half by the end of his first term. Given the shaky recovery, he’s right to break that promise. The short-term goal must be economic growth, not deficit-trimming. Taming the ever-growing pile of debt is a longer-term challenge.

On that goal, measured against his own fiscal commission, Obama’s proposed budget for fiscal year 2013 falls short. At the end of the 10-year budget window, he would have the national debt at a disturbing 76.5 percent of gross domestic product. By comparison, the debt reduction plan envisioned by the Simpson-Bowles commission would reduce the debt-to-GDP ratio close to a more manageable, if still unhealthy, 60 percent.

Measured against other standards, Obama’s plan looks better. Republicans in Congress propose to take a machete to spending. Republicans running for president propose the machete cuts coupled with trillions in tax cuts. They offer no realistic prospect of getting the debt under control, and the proof of that is their unwillingness to specify where and how they would slash spending, as their tax plans would require them to do.

The president at least offers a serious, if inadequate, effort to put the country on a sustainable path. His budget recognizes, as Republicans will not, that spending cuts and revenue increases will be needed. It does not slash the social safety net nor eviscerate the spending, for example on research and infrastructure, essential to sustaining a vibrant economy. At the same time, the Obama budget recognizes that the recovering economy still needs help — not the contractionary fiscal shock that would come from letting all the Bush tax cuts expire.

By one additional standard — governing reality — neither side is offering much. A disaster awaits at the end of this year, when mandated “sequesters” of federal spending will kick in because of Congress’ failure to craft a long-term debt plan. These include cuts to the defense budget that Obama’s defense secretary has warned are insupportable. Adopting the Obama budget would forestall these. But all of Washington knows that’s not going to happen in this election year. Unfortunately, we likely will have to wait until December for the real debate.

— The Washington Post