DNR’s release: “Elk hunt extended to meet management goals, control depredation” should leave Minnesotans shaking their heads. There appears to be no logic to our DNR’s conservation practices other than to satisfy their “clients” — cattle industry and trophy hunters.
A recreational wolf hunt has ended, which lacked scientific data. It also lacked a clear plan forward, and the wolf hunt was rejected by 80 percent of the surveyed public.
Elk are the preferred prey animal of the wolf. If we truly want a self-sustaining timber wolf population, then why are we killing elk?
Enter cattle industry: The DNR has quietly opened up thousands of acres of public wild lands to cattle-grazing operations at taxpayer expense with no charge to cattle owners. Many of these acres are in elk and wolf territory. Wolves promote healthy wildlands by forcing elk and deer to move often. Conversely, cows grazing on this same land destroy the land as they graze down through roots, which in turn promotes soil erosion and destroys water quality. Cows are replacing species critical to our Minnesota ecosystem.
If one connects the dots it is quite clear that a wolf hunting season has nothing to do with conservation.
Minnesotans must call their legislators and encourage them to support the elimination of wolf hunting and demand a plan forward based not only on accurate collected data and current science but input from the true “clients” of the DNR: the public at large.
Melanie Weberg
Bloomington



Comments (13)
Add commentI agree with you.
The planned wolf hunt should be changed, then expanded see below.
All wolves in Greater Minnesota should be eliminated by the people that are having problems with them, without the current red tape clogging up the process. The decision to hunt wolves or not hunt wolves doesn't need to come from someone who is living in the twin cities, it needs to come from someone who is living with the beasts in the Greater Minnesota Regions. The best policy is to eliminate all the wolves you can find in populated rural areas. This will force the ravenous beasts to populate areas that People don't frequent. If the wolf population is kept in check by the people living among them, then there is no need for government involvement.
By the way,
Runoff brings nuitrients into the lakes.
Melanie
I would like to see where that survey was taken?? You say 80%. I bet it was taken in White Bear Lake & Scribbs said no 100 times.
I swear it's true
1. 80% of public rejects the wolf hunt
2. Thousands of acres of public wild lands opened to cattle owners at NO COST
3. I saw Elvis at Walmart
4. I didn't inhale
Well, she said
80% of the surveyed public, though. They probably took the survey at a PETA rally.
Never seen it happen!
Cows don't eat roots. they don't like the taste of dirt. (at least 80% of them).
Aw-sheep
You are going to make OFB home sick!!!!!
Public Lands
I think what Melanie is forgetting that the reason the DNR opened the public land to graze cattle was because of the extreme drought. Farmers were unable to produce hay to feed their cattle and this was one of the very few options available.
Hein1
With the wind we have here today I think I am at home!!!
Thin Air?
I think that Purposed could have selected a better term than (thin air?)!! Maybe Hot Air Vents would have been more informative !!
Oh Melanie,
It's nice being insulated in good ol Bloomington isn't it? I heard a stray raccoon was spotted not long ago and animal control was brought in to save you all from that devastating creature.