As a representative from rural Minnesota, you’d think Rep. John Ward might actually vote with rural Minnesota’s best interests in mind.
Think again.
On the first day of the 2013 legislative session, Rep. Ward allowed a Minneapolis environmentalist to take control of funding for agriculture and rural Minnesota economic development programs. Rep. Jean Wagenius, an environmentalist representative from Minneapolis, now chairs the committee whose decisions directly impact jobs in our area.
Rep. Ward had an opportunity to resolve this problem, but he failed. He voted against an amendment which would have put rural decisions in the hands of a committee run by a representative from a more fitting place: Austin. Instead, for only the second time in nearly 150 years, a Twin Cities lawmaker will be calling the shots for agriculture.
People from greater Minnesota should make decisions pertaining to agriculture. That is the way it almost always has been and the way it should be today. Yet the very first “real” vote Rep. Ward cast on the House floor this year left rural Minnesota’s future in the hands of an environmentalist from Minneapolis.
I hope Rep. Ward will reconsider his vote, and support any further efforts to recombine the two committees. Together we can help ensure that rural Minnesota is properly represented at the Capitol.
State Rep. Kurt Daudt
Crown
State Rep. Rod Hamilton
Mountain Lake



Comments (46)
Add commentsnow? southie?
fish?........... smartguy.......
Ward's vote -- one of moderation, paying attention
to all constituents (not just industrial farming), seems reasonable for demographics of 10A.
Rep. Hamilton, former chair of Ag/Finance Cmte, is a Christensen Farms production agricultural hog producer. (No conflict of interest when he chaired Ag?) My family is also involved in Big Pork biz in Iowa, and this business sometimes needs, shall we say, "encouragement" to maintian environmental friendliness. (Don't get me wrong, I love me some bacon and Famous Daves, but MPCA rules have their place, too.)
"It's fascinating for Hamilton to be fretting about bills that the DFL caucus doesn't seem to be talking about--nor does Bluestem expect them to be brought forward by Jeanne Poppe, DFL-Hormel (Austin), who now heads the next morph of Hamilton's old committee. Nor do we foresee the senate counterpart, run by Dan Sparks, DFL-Hormel(Austin), as abandoning production agriculture.
Rather, those concerns seem generated more by The Price is Right's Bob Barker and Mercy for Animals, which last summer released a video that went viral that purported to be shot from the inside of hog barns kept by Hamilton's employer, Christensen Farms.
So far as Bluestem knows, Barker was not elected to the Minnesota Legislature, although Hamilton anticipated the undercover Mercy for Animals videographer when he introduced the infamous Ag-Gag bill in 2011. (To read Christenen Farms' response to the video, click here).
And while Hamilton may not have a college education, it's clear that he's grown on the job:
He has been with Christensen Farms for 19 years now working his way through the ranks, developing expertise in production, business development, human resources, public relations, political relations, transportation logistics, bio-security and communications.
Knowing the importance of getting involved, Hamilton became a member of the Minnesota Farm Bureau and the Minnesota Pork Producers Association along with their local affiliates. Both organizations provided opportunities for Hamilton to network with individuals making a difference in agriculture.
Christensen Farms employs over 1000 employees in six states, generating revenues of about $500 million annually.
Other than that, Hamilton is an uneducated hog farmer."
http://www.bluestemprairie.com/bluestemprairie/2012/12/representation-ro...
. . . one of the strongest advocates for farmers in our MN state history was an environmentalist progressive from the north side of Minneapolis (former Gov. Floyd B. Olson. This historic fact may be something rural Republicans in the legislature should have considered this week before they attacked the new DFL selection for chairwoman of the Environment, Natural Resources and Agriculture Finance Committee, Rep. Jean Wagenius. She is also an environmental progressive from Minneapolis, but from the south side of the metropolis." http://www.conservationminnesota.org/news/headlines/agriculture-and-envi...
The House Republican signers of this letter, still possibly stinging from losing their Chair(s) in ag-related committees, should give the new division of powers a chance. For all we know, Rep. Wagenius likes her eggs with bacon, too, but also likes to drink clean water and smell clean air at the breakfast table.
Another republican classic!
The dust is barely off the gavel after the opening session of the 2013 legislature. Following a resounding defeat that one might think would encourage republicans to take a lot more care with the partisan attacks that helped lead to their defeat--they come out with a partisan attack.
They probably have a point to be made--but they zoom past that into absurdity as usual. They take care to not name their preferred candidate--and his direct ties to an industry he would have been dealing with had he been appointed as environment, nat. resource and ag finance chair.
Not only is his day job with an agricultural business, it is one of the most penalized polluters among all ag business. That industry has been highly critical of regulations that protect the environment and even surrounding property owners from problems that can force them to move and lower their property values dramatically.
But republicans want voters to think appointing that guy to head a natural resource committee is a good idea! He'd be rolling back pollution standards in a heartbeat. You'd think they would start to get the idea after the election beat down, but I guess it's all about pleasing the increasingly tiny base!
Conserving the environment
Conserving the environment for us and future generations is a bad thing?
Thanks Rep Ward!
Bubba
Is it ok for John Ward, a retired teacher collecting pension
to sponsor a bill that has to do with teacher's pensions?
Should any teacher or school employee sponsor any bill
having to do with school funding/employee pay? If they benefit, should they sponsor the bill or should they vote on it?
I don't care who chairs the committee. Of course, he had to
vote with the caucus. That comes before his district.
Does he know anything about ag?
That was too much information. After all, the letter was only about John Ward and the committee. I know, you want to
stress why they wrote the letter. Do you care that Mr.Ward
voted in unison with the City Dems?
Uneducated hog farmer?
Uneducated hog farmer? That is low and smelly.
Do the 2 DFL's work for Hormel? Poppe andSparks?..
"Rod Hamilton, pork producer"
He should run for the US Congress with that on his résumé!
Apples to oranges Sadie
Ward is retired from teaching, and thus couldn't directly financially benefit from any work on educational issues in the legislature.
You simply can't get away from any individual legislator working on something of interest to them. The key--and I see a lot of republicans ignoring this lately--is whether there is direct, financial benefit from doing so.
I think we want people working in areas where they have expertise, don't we? Do you really want someone having no say on legislation when they are more of an expert on it's impact than others would be?
It's when it comes to directly benefiting financially that legislators get into trouble, no matter what party they belong to.
And even worse is putting the fox in charge of the henhouse--which is what these two jokers are whining about. Committee chairs should be supportive of the general function of their committee--not someone who would just as soon see it abolished entirely!
I told you this before
For those of you who don't remember, I constantly told you on this website, before the election, John Ward is for John Ward and doesn't give a darn who he steps on once you elect him. This guy has abused Veterans, disabled citizens, all of which you didn't care about when you re-elected this little monkey, but now he is stepping on more of our local economy and making a few more people upset. Well, you elected this little monkey, now live with it. It has always been this way with John Ward and I'm sorry you have to be bitten by him before you realize it. He now has a position of authority (help) in the State House and should be helping us back here in CWC, not hurting us. Once again, John Ward is for John Ward is for John Ward is for John Ward is for John Ward IS FOR JOHN WARD. WHAT PART OF THAT DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND. This is not partisan politics. It's the truth. I personally sat in a meeting with Nolan, Radinovich, Ward and his puppeteer Don Samuelson, and listened to Ward and Samuelson outright lie to Nolan. Since Nolan is a democrat also, it goes to show you, Ward doesn't care who he steps on, as long as Little Johnny is taken care of (and his sidekick, Samuelson). Now, you voted for it, you live with it.
Pat my back, and I'll pat yours
Something needs to be done with the public pension system in MN and that includes the teachers pension fund.
Underfunded. I believe we (taxpayers) paid in extra to help out. Wiill they take a cut in pension pay? Will they even take a cut in the proposed increase?
It is complicated but, private taxpayers can't continue to fund the public pensions.
John Ward does and will continue to look out for his pension and the pay of teachers. After all, it's for the kids.
Now when he retires or loses his seat, he can double dip.
Not public service - self-service.
I mention John Ward and teachers pension because someone brought up the uneducated pig farmer. They fail to see the flaws in Mr. Ward.
As for Mr. Nolan,
don't think he wasn't aware how much being Representative for two years would increase his pension.
He stands to get at least $113,000 per year raise in his pension in two years. Isn't that a sweet bonus for "serving the taxpayers" again?
DITTO
Ditto to that SML. Two thumbs up to ya this morning.
Hey Denny and Mikey O-14 comments
It sure didn't take long for this low-life John Ward article to be downgraded off the recent comments list. Only 14 comments and you jerked it. Not bad cover for Little Johnny. By the way, how much does little johnny pay you two clowns to cover for him. Does he use campaign finance money or does he use his own chump change. Be honest now. LOL. And you libs want to know why Keith was hired.
"uneducated hog farmer" not my words, first of
all, Sadie and Purposed. Did you read the post, or just jump to your own conclusions? Those were Hamilton's own words, describing himself in self-deprecating manner (in order to portray himself as an "awe, shucks, I'm just a farmer, who knows nothing about business" kind of guy. I agree -- not a very civil description of himself.
Teacher pensions are, apparently, fixed at the time of a teacher's retirement, so any votes Rep. Ward casts won't affect his paycheck.
Proud Rino -- Thanks, as usual, for your good and reasonable sense of things.
Hey charlie
That list is set to show the 'Most Recent' comments.
The number of comments to appear limit is set at 9 (time limit is set to last 36 hours).
If more than 9 comments are made on any combination of other articles after the last one was made on said article, that comment gets automatically bumped off the list cause it no longer is 'most recent' according to the settings.
If you look at the 'Latest Updates' links near the top of the right-hand column you'll see there's a choice for 'Most Viewed' (which is automatically selected) and 'Most Commented'.
Look there or at the section the article is placed in (opinion, open forum, news, etc...) to find an article when something gets bumped off the most recent list.
Wisconsin Cheddar, not brie!!
Purposed: Hate to upset the tidy profile you've created, but if I can place my own order, I'll take Wisconsin cheddar, Famous Dave's and an ice-cold brewski. I don't mind jazz if someone's playing it, but not my first choice. Some of my favorite people -- whose intelligence I hold in high regard -- have received their "degrees" from the school of hard knocks, rather than an institution of "higher learning". You make some fairly unfounded presumptions, my friend.
"As to city folks heading agriculture decision making, where is Cargill headquartered." Wagenius's town of origin doesn't preclude her using her brain and experience to make best decisions with limited budget resources. Ward isn't my Representative, but, given the demographic breakdown of his constituents' occupations, it seems like he's walking a middle road. The tourism industry in 10A may occasionally have different interests than agribusiness (and the latter isn't huge in 10A).
Hey, Charlie. I disagree with your characterization of Ward, but to each their own. Do you read Strib? If not, here's an article regarding Vet's benefits that you might find interesting:
http://www.startribune.com/local/186641021.html?refer=y
The punctuation you're looking for, Purposed, is a "quotation
mark". And, those were Rep. Hamilton's words to describe himself. Read the Bluestemprairie piece, and verify it for yourself. What I "sounded like"? Really? How about reading the words as actually printed/quoted, and not projecting onto them what YOU think I think? In this situation, you are, quite simply, wrong. Mr. Hamilton was trying to be self-deprecating -- certainly his prerogative. And, by the way, most hog farmers I know (in my family) are very smart and savvy businessmen/women who make a very good living. They'll also press the limits of environmental regulations until someone calls them on it, unfortunately.
Again, Purposed, it is one, long quote from Bluestemprairie
that includes the apparently offensive speech to which you refer. If the Dispatch had a way of "block quoting", it may have been easier to discern that it was a long, multi-paragraph quote. You could also verify it as a long quote by simply clicking on the BSP reference, following last quotation mark. Simple. If my English teacher has a problem with my grammar and writing skills, so be it. I never purported to be a great writer. This is more about the content -- and the content you are attributing to me is not mine (it's Bluestem Prairie's and Rep. Hamilton's).
We all know folks who are self-deprecating in the manner of Rep. Hamilton when he referred to himself as an "uneducated hog farmer". It was tongue-in-cheek, to throw us off of the path of what was, in reality, great business acumen and success. Peace back at ya, Purposed! I'll try to bone-up on my grammar and punctuation skills for future posts, if they're throwing you off course!
Bubba
Charlie will mess himself when he see's that you mentioned his name and strib in the same sentence. He unleashed his wrath the time I mentioned the strib.
Something about being too lazy to look things up in better places. I figured he wanted me to look it up in the Fox page. That isn't going to happen.
Charlie is kinda fun to stir up isn't he? ;)
Thanks Bubba-Interesting
No, I don't read the strib. I have more respect for my conservative values. The strib is a liberal rag. With that said, I did follow your advice and read that article. Much of that article, if not all of it, is true. The advice from the Duluth area applies right here in CWC also. I can eleborate with evidence on every one of the issues in this article. I personally have a congressional investigation ongoing that was originated with congressman Cravaack office and was handed to Nolans office when he took over so that it can continue through the process. This is an issue that should have been resolved at the VA Hospital in Mpls. but a lack of leadership at the Local VA and regional VA medical centers has caused it to be dragged all the way to Washington. You wouldn't believe the way these government VA employees treat our congressmen/congresswomen. They no longer show any type of respect for our legislative leaders. I believe their conduct originates in DC. On the federal level, we have never been treated so lowly as we have been, under the leadership of the current director of Veterans Affairs, Mr, Shinseki, a presidential appointee and cabinet member in the Obama administration. The mentality appears to be money first, veterans health next. The exact opposite of what it should be. On the statewide level, we have a very good commissioner of veterans affairs, Lt General Larry Shellito. He is a Dayton appointee. I can't believe he was aware of the problems mentioned in this article. After reading this article, I immediately placed a call to him and I know he will return my call tomorrow morning. I will discus it with him and will get some answers. As to the problems that exist here in CWC, and there are multiple, I have already been in contact with county officials and they are well aware of the local situation. Look for changes in CWC. Now, on the other hand, the Veterans Service Officer, a woman, in Aitkin County, has got to be one of the best in the state. An example that all 87 counties in Minnesota should follow. I don't have the time or space to elaborate further on here about the article you quoted by I am infuriated. I am not a one man wrecking crew but I will get some answers. I may need the help of veterans like you for support but I'll work it by myself for now. Thanks again for your info on this article.
s/s Charlie PS: I advise that if you need veterans support, contact the Aitkin County Veterans Service Officer, not CWC. You don't need to live in Aitkin Cty to go there.
Bubba-FYI
Bubba, two of the biggest anti veteran people in the area are employees at the BDD. And it's not Keith. These are duplicates of the Kent State protesters.
Bubba
The uneducated hog farmer remark, I knew it wasn't from you
but, did think it was from the writer. I didn't understand that the guy said it himself. Good for him as that is an occupation that gets the jokes. I had to read your first comment twice as all the names got confusing
I read the Strib article, I think yesterday, and it was eye opening to say the least.
To me, this article was about John Ward not the pig farmer.
Bubba again
I would definitly like working with you on Veterans issues as you do seem to have a real interest and desire in Vets. However, do to the nature of this website, we would have to use a different form of communication. If you can come up with a way for us to get together on this issue, please let me know. I can't put my e-mail address or phone number on this site, however it is possible we can meet somewhere if you can figure it out. Although we wear our politics on different sleeves, I believe we can work veterans without politics. That has always been my policy.
Hey GrannyLee60
For such a senior citizen, you are kinda funny sometimes. Remember, laughter is the best medicine, especially for senior seniors. LOL
"I believe we can work
"I believe we can work veterans without politics. That has always been my policy". Thanks for the laugh Charlie.
The farmer in the dell, part II: The saga continues!
Sadie, you say, "To me, this article was about John Ward, not the pig farmer", but it was the "pig farmer" (Rep. Hamilton) who wrote the letter critical of Rep. Ward! It's about both of them, and more. (Remember, Farmer Hamilton, the man who lost his job as Ag Policy and Finance chair, who had a potential conflict of interest when he was in the position, and who thinks Rep. Ward is voting against some vague "rural" interests.) Hamilton's letter appeared in papers throughout the state (as one can tell from the vague language). Hamilton's and Ward's constituents' interests are not the same, and, presumably Ward considered his own 10A demographics when he voted on this House housekeeping issue.
In fact the last sentence of para. 3 in Hamilton's (and Daudt's) letter, " . . . now chairs the committee whose decision directly impact jobs in OUR (caps mine) area", indicates they didn't even bother to adapt their form letter sufficiently to apply to us. ("our area" should be "YOUR area"). It seems all they bothered to do with this canned letter was fill in the name of the legislator they were attacking. I'm not a fan of one-size-fits-all attack letters like this, from either side of the political aisle.
Eye: Thanks for the good feedback. I incorrectly presumed my three paragraph introduction to the Bluestem quote was sufficient. But there's admittedly lots of backstory involved to understand the context of this lte meant to demean Ward. Once I realized who Rep. Hamilton was, his canned attack became a meaningless political exercise, overshadowed by his personal resume and potential conflicts of interest.
Charlie: As I mentioned a couple of days ago, I'm not a veteran -- just an interested citizen who thinks promises made by our gov't. to our vets need to be honored, period. Few things upset me more than when I hear about the long wait time for vets in need of physical/mental healthcare. Absolutely unacceptable. We shouldn't be entering into "off-the-books" wars (in terms of paying for them, including vet after-care) if we refuse to raise the revenue to pay for them.
Kent State
What better example of the need to protect are second and third amendment rights than Kent state! Them hippies was out of control, heavily armed and packing with they're weaponry from patty scialfa and the SLA etc. The well regulated militia though overmatched in weaponry fired back in self defense. Like the alamo cept better caused they took out godless commies. Brings a tear to me one good eye. Charlie thank you for your service and thank you for the reminder of are brave heroes at Kent State!
SMTN
Aitkin
You gotta love how
the Lefters "thumb up" this lying Liberal. It's like stuffing a ballot box and paying illegals to vote for them. drhassett has a good crowd to hang out with.
Sadie....
I assume your husband married you for your looks?
Not
I'm not a Senior Citizen Charlie, but I am a grandmother. I know laughter is the best medicine and I get my medicine every day reading your comments and your opinions.
Smile and get over it :)