Don’t let government decide
DO you want the government telling you what you can and can’t do? If not, vote “no” on both the marriage amendment and the voter identification amendments. Voting “no” will not “change the definition of marriage” or allow unregistered people to vote. Voting “no” will leave the current laws in place.
Patricia W. Scott
Brainerd
Comments (7)
Add commentThis is so goofy that I'm not sure if it even
warrants a response, but how does voting no keep the government from deciding the marriage question while voting yes allows the government to decide the marriage question? In either case, I'm the one deciding the marriage question based on my vote.
Con artists at work again.
Ever notice how it's the conservatives that want to force government into our private lives?
The manufactured voter ID is just a diversion to keep us from noticing the GOP is holding the back door to our elections open for corporations (including foreign) and wealthy indiduals.
If marriage were a private institution...
...we wouldn't be voting on its definition. It's the public implications of marriage that make it a matter of public concern.
One does has to wonder why a person would go into a tizzy about things staying the same under this ballot initiative, unless, of course, they were hoping to change the definition through the courts, but that would be downright undemocratic of them!
Judith
Sorry to get off subject but by chance where you related to the late Leonard M? He sure was a good man.
He was my father-in-law...
OFB, and yes, he was a very good man.
Good to know
Heck I might have even met you before. I still sneak down to the store every now & then.
Maybe you have...
...I get down there every now and then, although my hubby makes it there fairly often.