Recently, Rep. Ward expressed criticism of my work at the state Capitol, claiming the majority caucus budget bills include all cuts and hidden fees. I’m disappointed to hear this. It tells me — more importantly, it tells you — he hasn’t read our proposals. Instead, Rep. Ward prefers legislating with party rhetoric and tax-and-spend ideology. The fact is we’ve proposed $4 billion above last biennium. We cannot spend $5 billion above that, doing so would impose heavy tax increases on Minnesotans.
Rep. Ward claims I’m “unwilling to work” with him.” We discussed a bill for a veterans home. Since I serve on the State Government Innovation and Veterans Committee, I take this very seriously. I felt it imperative to do my homework, speak with constituents and Gen. Shellito. They don’t support expansion of veterans homes right now. Rep. Ward has introduced four veterans home bills but doesn’t appear to have asked for committee hearings, even when he was in the majority. Committee hearings are critical for transparency and bill passage. It seems Rep. Ward is willing to promise but not deliver. As I’ve said, I’ll always be straightforward with voters. I don’t make promises I can’t keep.
To help our economy, the first bill I co-authored in the Senate was a jobs bill to boost Minnesota’s businesses, stimulating private sector jobs through tax and mandate relief. The best approach to getting our state back on the path to prosperity lies within our proposed budget. We’ve put government spending under a microscope, made it more efficient and increased spending on education and health care for vulnerable adults. Contrary to what Rep. Ward claims, we’re not cutting. We’ve increased funding by $4 billion while living within our means, not raising taxes to spend an additional $5 billion beyond what we have.
Sen. Paul Gazelka
R-Brainerd



Comments (12)
Add commentSF 1106
Senator Gazelka has authored a bill that would allow ATVs to ride on the highway. It's SF 1106.
Since they would be using the highways I've asked Senator Gazelka if he would amend his bill to eliminate the $2 million ATV gas tax "refund" that robs money for snow plowing from our gas tax fund. He hasn't responded.
ATVs are not designed for riding on hard surfaces and many people have died from rollovers on highways. That has happened right here in Crow Wing County.
Who pays for those accidents? Obviously the rider and their family pay but so do Crow Wing County taxpayers for police time. Then we pay again through higher health insurance premiums. Maybe that's good for the senators insurance business?
Did you know that it's legal for ATV riders to drink alcohol and ride as long as they are on a designated trail? That includes our highways if they are part of a trail.
SF 1106 text
https://www.revisor.mn.gov/bin/bldbill.php?bill=S1106.1.html&session=ls87
I see they are required to have insurance.
Hmmm.....Senator Gazelka sells insurance.
Good for someone's business?
Is that why he was elected?
ward and socialism
the only thing ward knows how to do is raise fees and taxes! now he wants to raise boat and trailor fees for invasive species-i think he is one!
at the candidates forum last fall...
I was at the candidates forum last fall ... and at that meeting, I believe it was Paul Koering who commented that then representative Gazelka did not visit Koering's office to work on mutual matters for this area. Could it be that this is part of Sen. Gazelka's work pattern?
legal for ATV riders to drink alcohol
Will we be able to drink alcohol on the trail that is proposed to go through the fair grounds?
Fish,
simple question; If there were no ATV's would the gas tax that ATV'ers pay still be there for plowing the roads?
(writer's note: I do not and never have owned an ATV)
lezned
you've obviously talked with koering about this. and like so many people, you believe him when he manipulates the stories he tells from his time in st paul. he thinks he can tell the same story over and over, that people down there don't like him simply because he's gay...from what i hear, his behavior was that of a little boy just entering puberty. unable to control himself and completely irresponsible. he sure likes the victim card though. whine whine whine. he should give smarter people than him more credit, and a wider birth.
Can't wait for elections !!!
Sounds like Gazelka is already running for re-election. Gonna enjoy voting against him.
Hey allenjohnson
Read my post again. I stated that Koering had said that "then representative Gazelka did not visit Koering's office to work on mutual matters." This was at the candidates' forum last fall.
Then read Sen. Gazelka's letter; he states "Rep. Ward claims I’m “unwilling to work” with him.”
I am asking if there's a pattern here, that's all. I HOPE that Sen. Gazelka is working with our other legislators. I hope there's no pattern here.
llr, yes the money would
llr, yes the money would still be there because the "refund" is far more than what ATV riders pay into our gas tax fund. They siphon off nearly $2 million from our gas tax fund. There is no way that ATV riders buy enough gas put $2 million in gas taxes into the fund. And if they are allowed to ride on the highway as Gazelka wants why should there be any "refund" at all?
Click on the "gas tax" at the bottom of my webpage. http://www.angelfire.com/mn3/dnrdocuments/HayCreek.html
It looks like Analytical is trolling the Dispatch to defend Gazelka's bad decisions again. I wonder how much he gets paid to attack residents.
Fish JR
You're the troll, sir. How much time do you spend on this site? Don't you ever run out of things to say? Again, read the bill, it doesn't look like ATV's as in 4 wheelers, the bill pertains to motorcycles.
I don't defend Gazelka, LeMieur, Ward, Dayton, et al. I am opposed to trollers and dfl propagandists like you who lie to make a point on issues.
And, you have your own personal website? Does it have your name on it and everything, John?
"the rollerbladers, walker
"the rollerbladers, walker and Bicycle riders pay anything"
The "rollerbladers, walkers, and bicyclists" (those Save the Earth granola-types that Sleepy perceives as liberals) contribute very little to the degradation of the asphalt surface of the trails. Conversely, they "pay" in the form of their taxes. It is primarily the unregulated use of the trail system by snowmobilers and the damage caused by their track systems that brings about the need for sooner-than-necessary expensive maintenance. Has anyone ever heard of the DNR ticketing a studded-track snowmobiler or confiscating a sled as they race from bar to bar on the Paul Bunyan 'expressway'? It doesn't happen. Apparently, someone has decided that the economic input snowmobiling provides private business in the area outweighs the public cost of trail repair. Would this be considered 'socialism', sleepy?