• Clear sky
  • 73°
    Clear sky

sponsored by Edina Realty

  • Comment

Open Forum: Our war budget must be trimmed

Posted: February 25, 2011 - 10:29pm

The dictator of Libya is holed up in Tripoli. “From the Halls of Montezuma to these Shores of Tripoli.” Our Marines have fought gallantly for centuries. Today’s news reports that tanks are circling Gadhafi’s hideout. Earlier we learned that armed Libyan helicopters and fighter aircraft were firing on protesters in the streets.

Since the United States has been the world’s largest manufacturer and exporter of weapons for decades, it is no surprise when we learn that overseas tanks, aircraft, bombs, bullets, and even tear gas canisters are made in the USA.

The American gunman in Pakistan who killed two alleged assailants on the street turns out to have been a former employee of Blackwater and currently is working under contract for the CIA, in “protection.”  He has diplomatic immunity according to our government. It says so on his passport. We also heard reports that more than one passport was on his person. Is “Mr. Phelps” on a Mission Impossible?

Should you choose to believe our story, there still remains this question for America in the 21st Century: “When will we learn to live in this world as force for justice, equality, and peace, without war?”

It is time to disarm ourselves of the unnecessary 20th Century weapons for wars we will never fight again. It is time to stop building a military global empire with American weapons assistance and military training of foreign personnel.

Our trillion dollar annual war budget must be trimmed, if we are to afford a decent society within our own borders. A society with justice and liberty for all Americans. 

Gordon Prickett

Aitkin

 

Public workers are scapegoats

The political right’s unconscionable demonization of public workers is doing  what they intend. The corporate giants and their right wing cronies want to  turn the middle class against itself. They want division; union vs. non-union  workers, public vs private employees, all the while powerful corporate  interests keep getting richer and share non of the sacrifice. Public employees are being blamed by the right for a financial crisis created by corporate special interest that defied and still defy regulation and accountability. Public employees did not create this mess but they are being  scapegoated by powerful corporate interests. Americans for Prosperity, the group lobbying for passage of the union-killing bill is funded primarily by Koch Industry money.  Corporate America would like nothing better than to destroy the only safety net for workers; their unions. That is what this fight is all about. Public employees have become the scapegoat for the financial woes of state governments across America. They do not deserve this treatment. We do not deserve this deceptive behavior of our elected  officials.

Marian Severt

Brainerd 

 

The moment of truth

The guest column in the Feb. 22nd Dispatch written by Bill Sanford, general manager of Lakeland Public Television, outlines genuine and valid reasons for continued federal funding of Public Radio and Television. I watch Public TV from time to time and the programs are interesting and informative.

In the whole mix of things that the federal government does, there are many good and valid programs. At some time in the past, Congress has passed laws that allowed each and every program to come in to existence.  Then money has been appropriated to fund the programs. 

The end result is that we have an over-extended budget and, while each manager, like Mr. Sanford, puts up a good defense of their particular program, we as a nation, have to decide when enough is enough. Instead of saying that we can’t afford all the goodies we have repeatedly borrowed money to pay for them. Seems like the moment of truth is upon us. It is time that we put things in perspective and own up to the fact that we must make cuts or drastically raise taxes. 

When we think about it, there is really no reason why the federal government should be in the radio or television business. Since it is a choice of raising taxes, or eliminating funding for public TV and radio, the choice should come down on the side of not raising taxes.  

Chuck Hagberg

Crosby 

 

A radical minority is in charge

A radical minority has seized control of this country and is undoing what is left of any safeguards and programs that help the ordinary citizen survive against huge financial institutions and corporations.

The cells and cadres of this radical minority have been quietly at work for a long time but have grown markedly stronger in the last four decades. As the enemy within has infiltrated the government, they have slowly reduced oversight, regulation and accountability within the society, freeing the rich and powerful to control and corrupt democratic institutions and weaken citizen control.

They have changed the tax structure from progressive to regressive ... the more you make the lower your effective tax rate becomes. The tax burden shifted from those with the most to those with the least.

They have gambled away our futures with their get-rich-quick schemes and destroyed the economy in the process, only to be rewarded by being refunded by taxpayers and receiving new safeguards against future losses. They have financed it by cutting jobs, lowering wages, raiding pensions, slashing home equity, foreclosing on homes and cutting services.  All to keep the rich from having to pay their share of the upkeep on a society that has rewarded them so well.

You cannot sustain even a semblance of democracy when the rich take most of the wealth generated by the hard work of the citizens and then refuse to participate in keeping that society viable. No democracy has ever existed with this kind of income gap, and it is not surviving here.

This radical minority wants to take us back to the corrupt period of robber barons and Daddy Warbucks, now adding the new dimension of Big Brother surveillance to control the people.

Perhaps the time has come to stand up and say “Enough.”

Bob Passi

Baxter 

 

Planners’ decision disappointing

I am disappointed by the County Planning Commission’s decision to press new ordinance changes further.

Their meeting was packed with people, the majority speaking in opposition.

Forget the fact that this was done in the dead of winter when seasonal property owners were not present. Forget the fact that the basic assumptions and data driving the changes were fundamentally flawed. Forget that the county did not do it’s homework to investigate costs or prove any tangible benefit. 

The Land Services Department and Planning Commission  were determined to make these changes. Period.

“Clean water” like the phrase “for our children,”  has become the mantra of bigger government supporters. And they are not above deception to get what they want.

So, the experts rolled out their presentations, and that was that.

One of the most distressing and shameless moments came when the DNR consultant attempted to draw a moral equivalency between those opposing the change to drunken drivers, “who killed thousands of people” before the government stepped in and showed us what was best for us.

Remember, these are the same “experts” who would have us believe that the more we spend, the richer we’ll become, and the more we extend unemployment, the faster the economy will recover.

Impervious surfaces? The commissioners ignored the fact that the entire county is “impervious” 50 percent of the year. We call it winter. The earth is frozen. Two university studies showed that more than 75 percent of unwanted runoff pollution occurs when the ground is frozen. But who needs facts when you have experts?

When we see no impact other than the loss of property rights, where will these experts be? And then what new ordinances will they dream up to blame things on in their quest to control other people’s  lives?

Tony Bauer

Nisswa  

 

And they call us greedy

While giving a speech former Sen. Alan Simpson called seniors the greediest generation.

Though he spoke the words, the rest of these 535 self-proclaimed “public servants,” that we elected to represent us, are equally guilty. They sat there on their self satisfied, spineless posteriors and not one corrected him. What the good senator did not mention is that most of the seniors currently drawing Social Security spent 45 to 50 years of their working life paying federally mandated FICA to prepay our pension. We paid this under federal law, and have a right to expect what the government promised us. The penalty for not paying this tax was, and is, arrest, fine and/or imprisonment.

Now to qualify for their pension all these 535 worthies have to do is get elected and sworn in. That’s it, they are set for life. When the rest of their cohorts vote themselves a raise all of the retired ones get that also. They contribute not one cent to this pension, they just vote it in for themselves out of our tax money.

They say that Social Security is in danger of going broke; well I have a solution for that. All they have to do is return the money that the Democrats stole from our, up until then “dedicated” fund, to pay for Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society.

And they call us greedy. Thank you.

Clyde DeBolt

Backus 

  • Comment

Comments (13)

Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
tripwire3
4809
Points
tripwire3 02/26/11 - 09:04 am
0
0

Upward redistribution

A bazillion dollars each year are being redistributed upward into the coffers of the rich and greedy CEO's of the major corporations in this country and it's all the fault of the Republicans.....(ad infinitum, ad nauseuum).

(Thought you may like a day off, Fish)

fishhead
5348
Points
fishhead 02/26/11 - 09:08 am
0
0

We NEED 100% public financing of elections

Our democracy died when activist Republican nominated Supreme Court judges turned our election process over to the corporations.

Now we're finding out that the same lobbying group (backed by corporate interests) that brought the fatal Citizens United case paid for advertising in support of Justice Thomas' nomination.

Justice Thomas voted in their favor when he became a Supreme Court Justice.

Now we're finding out that Justice Thomas' wife was paid 3/4 of million dollars by group with ties to corporate interests and he "forgot" to put it on his taxes.

Now we're finding out that justices Thomas and Scalia went to a Koch brothers 4 day retreat shortly before they voted in favor of the Citizens United group. Who paid for that and what did they get in return?

Why aren't people marching in the street over this conflict of interest in our highest court?

And why don't the Republicans seem to care that our Supreme Court is being corrupted?

wolfg1
603
Points
wolfg1 02/26/11 - 09:20 am
0
0

"Our democracy died when

"Our democracy died when activist Republican nominated Supreme Court judges turned our election process over to the corporations."

How? By allowing them to do the same thing that unions have been allowed to do for years?

fishhead
5348
Points
fishhead 02/26/11 - 11:20 am
0
0

Close wolfy

If you want to target unions then sure ban union spending on elections. I support that. But look at the big picture. It's far bigger than just the unions that your party demonizes.

We should not allow ANY group or ANY individual to change the outcome of ANY election by buying "free speech". That voids our votes.

Public funding would be 100x or maybe even 1,000x cheaper for taxpayers because it would reduce some of the pork.

Term limits would be needed to reduce RE-election pork.

fishhead
5348
Points
fishhead 02/26/11 - 11:23 am
0
0

The military finally speaks up for Smart Power

Finally! Finally some high ranking members of the military are speaking in favor of what they are calling smart power.

Instead of relying on bombs and bullets and blood they are starting to speak up on the effectiveness of humanitarian projects to keep America safer by improving the lives of other global citizens.

We'll see if the profit driven military industrial complex lets this overdue concept grow.

wolfg1
603
Points
wolfg1 02/26/11 - 11:29 am
0
0

Fish, I don't have a party,

Fish,

I don't have a party, and tend to vote a purple ballot. I think you know that my strong conservative views are on national defense, and budget issues. On many other issues, I am quite liberal.

I also agree with you in regards to funding of political races. But, it's all or nothing.

JohnBrown
55
Points
JohnBrown 02/26/11 - 01:08 pm
0
0

Good Letters Today

Gordon and Chuck are right.

Marian is wrong, but she is also a public employee. One of the few thing I have learned in my short time on this planet is to not even attempt to reason with public employees.

Bob needs a time machine so he can go back to the 50s and weed out all the subversive elements of our society.

Bravo, Tony.

Clyde, The fact is, the government confiscated your earnings and spent it. Social Security was promised to you, but you should know that the money that was promised to you will be stolen from other people to pay you. It's an unsustainable cycle that will end.

btlebb59
0
Points
btlebb59 02/27/11 - 11:58 am
0
0

Economics

We could save a ton of money each year by stopping all the people who are finding ways to "steal" money from Social Security, Medicare, etc.. Convicts in prison are allowed to use computers and they are taking 100's of millions from S.S. and Medicare. Plus cut out the earmarks on bills that are passed. Let's spend money on "things" we need, not like to have. As long as I am at it, bring our soldiers home. We are spending trillions in country's that we are "not" going to change.

Do_Not_Take_My_Gun
2
Points
Do_Not_Take_My_Gun 02/27/11 - 12:37 pm
0
0

Nation Building Helps Us All

My friends, my friends, when I read what was said here, I said to myself, "here, here" on cutting the public employee and the union busters. the unions is stealing from us all. that is where the waistful spending it really is, with the union bosses and mobsters and organized crime sucking the lifeblood out of are budget.

but if anything in recent memory has taught us any thing about the past and learning a new lesson for the future, it is Iraq. Although hated by the lib fascist party and it's agenda (dare i say "democrat" party?) the money invested in Iraq by the wisdom of George W and his "good old boys" was money well spend. We cleaned up all them weapons of mass desrtuction and got that old elf saddamn out of there. and now look at the pieceful prosperity of iraq today, a shining beacon of democracy for the rest of the middle east and north africa to model it's self after.

So no more talk about the defense budget, it has made the world a safer place and if anything we should spend more to build demoncracy in africa now including libya. If we can bust the unions and get the money back from the overpaid teachers and the administrators in schools and there bloated waistful spending, there will be a lot of money for more militatry spending. And a well regulated militia is our last line of defence when they come to take our guns, we will never let that happen.

Come to thing of it, it is FUNNY (maybe a sign from above?) that "LIBYA" rhymes with "DUBYA". coincendent? i do not thing so.

God bless the United States of America!

DNTMG
Aitkin

oldandretired
1960
Points
oldandretired 03/01/11 - 12:28 am
0
0

Union Busting

Isn't it interesting how folks close their ears to those things they don't want to hear. All the noise about the governor's plan to have union civil servants in Wisconsin pay for part of their benefits. Also, to allow those folks to bargain only for their wages and not their benefits. We must also note that in order to work in any of those positions the workers MUST belong to a union! Then those union dues which are collected go to support democrats running for office. After the election those folks who were backed by the unions must sit and negotiate wages with and for the people who elected them. We must remember also that those folks who do not want their dues to go towards the candidates backed by the unions have no choice. Pay your dues or lose your job and let the union spend the dues however they want.

How about a right to work law that allows those who don't want to be in the union to have the job and not belong and not pay dues?

Back to Top

Spotted

Please Note: You may have disabled JavaScript and/or CSS. Although this news content will be accessible, certain functionality is unavailable.

Skip to News

« back

next »

  • title http://spotted.brainerddispatch.com/galleries/541988/ http://spotted.brainerddispatch.com/galleries/544118/ http://spotted.brainerddispatch.com/galleries/544138/
  • title http://spotted.brainerddispatch.com/galleries/544128/ http://spotted.brainerddispatch.com/galleries/543013/ http://spotted.brainerddispatch.com/galleries/544108/
  • title
My Gallery

CONTACT US

  • Switchboard 218-829-4705
  • Report News 218-855-5860
  • Advertising 218-855-5835
  • Classifieds 218-855-5898
  • Circulation 218-855-5897
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback

ADVERTISING

SUBSCRIBER SERVICES

SOCIAL NETWORKING