What the....!? You know I am not actually bothered or concerned about the 2nd Amendment stuff, I don't think banning guns is going to solve the problem. It arguably will need a multi-pronged approach.

However, what I have a problem with is why does Mills and his ridiculous, unscientific demonstration get over 12 minutes of free advertising? If you have a problem write a letter to the open forum like the rest of the non-silverspoon brigade. This video really proves nothing more than a duck gun hits a piece of paper more rapidly than AR-15! I could hit the paper quicker with a paint-gun but it does not mean it's going to kill you. Would like to have seen a dead carcass strung up there and see what it does?

BTW, sticking an armed guard at the door of a school will do little perhaps? If one was to attack a school he/she would be the first person they would be looking for.

Bad move Dispatch, last time I shop a Fleet Farm, sorry.

Nice attempt at being funny. LOL, I not sure I have seen Liza Minelli cd's (who buys cd's now anyway) and feathered boa's at the 'men's mall', more disturbing perhaps (apart from you added nothing to the conversation) is you know where these items are in the 'men's Mall', perhaps you wear them with Stewart, I have seen him with high heels on in the Dispatch before.

At least add something informative, and then try humor, both of which you have demonstrated as been incapable of doing so far...

You are correct, therefor you get a free cup of espresso and a puppy.

Next question, was the 2nd amendment written for just hunting?

MN-Tiger..you will shop at Fleet Farm again and you know it. Everyone does. Its like the people who boycott WalMart. Sure they do, Yep.

The gun control crowd is going after guns they think are scary looking, period. They know NOTHING about guns and its evident by the comments our "leaders" in DC make every day. An AR-15 looks ominous because its the basic gun we've seen our troops carry in combat since the 1960's and Vietnam when we knew it as the M-16. Its just a semi-automatic gun. Period. These "leaders" and the lap-dog media dont know the difference between "semi" and "fully" automatic. Not a clue. Watching David Gregory hold up that clip on NBC News was embarassing..its scary looking because it is curved..ie;bananna clip. And handguns? Those scary looking Glock's? And Sig-Sauer? Even the name sounds scary...Ashley Banfield on CNN said that Sig-Sauer sounded scary..Anyone knows that a revolver is just as dangerous as a semi-auto 9mm Glock in the wrong hands. The anti-gun crowd is coming after the "scary" ones now. Thats just a start.

Remember in history the majority of political assinations and attempts in the US were not done by assassins using the "scary" looking ones:
Lincoln: muzzle loaded single shot Derringer
JFK: Bolt action
RFK: 22 revolver
Wallace: revolver
MLK: Deer rifle
Ford: Shot at twice with revolvers
Reagan: revolver
John Lennon: revolver

They want them all..this is just a start

you stumped her that time! Or she's having someone read the Amendment that is a slow reader. (Did you teach her southie?).

I have asked this question again and again... Tell me what law would have stopped the murder in conn. answer: none. Unless you're for an all out ban on guns. Quit lying about new laws because there is nothing short of a ban and that will not stop people from killing and cannot happen without a fight!

the Lefters want to confiscate all guns. They know what law abiding citizens have already (thanks to breaking the laws on a registration data base. {Constitutional violation} not a problem for crooked politicians!)
I just want to know how they are going to confiscate the criminal's guns!!!!!!!!!! (I mean the ones that don't work for them!)
I agree that Stewart may have just given Nolan another gun to ban with this video and I wonder when Ricky staged that photo.

I hunt. Own several guns. In fact, I just bought a muzzleloader from Fleet Farm after Christmas.

This video seems pretty silly. The crucial question here is the capacity of each weapon and the context in which it is used. The demonstration was pretty obviously rigged.

Not that I necessarily disagree with the point being made, but this is not really an attempt to make any kind of empirical data.

Despite the ridiculous nature of this video, I probably will still shop at Fleet Farm. Just because it is a pretty dang good store. Fleet Farm video commentary? Not so much.

I agree with you. They didn't really have a good shooter but wanted to get the women in there. This video probably will boomarang on him.

the plan is to agree with you and Stewart. The want your shotgun too but are afraid to do it all at once. Semi-autos today and semi- auto pistols tomorrow and shotguns next week and 22s in a month........
The Lefter goal is to disarm the oposition and run roughshod over us. Like Biden said, he wants us in chains. Oil Can Harry doesn't want the unwashed stinking up the capital. Can any of you figure it out yet? Scribbles, do you really support this regime?

LMAO! Ok, not that I care, but I guess I do. Why when someone asked what AR stands for and I answered the question (correctly) did I get 2 thumbs down? Duh, now I know why my wife tells me not to meddle with the cretins online.

Anyway, it seems the consensus is Mr. Stewart should stick to retail, because it really was a pretty lame video lets be honest. I think this is more to do with the worry of sales than anything. Lame.

I have not been in Fleet Farm for over 4 years, so there is nothing there I can't buy elsewhere, so no I won't HAVE to go back.

Relax people, regardless of what Rush says no one is going to take our guns away. How would they actually do it, oh dear. I shoot them first anyway.

How in debt is the Gov? What money do they have? Why do they want our firepower for, and what are they going to do with it if they get it? This sounds like some paranoid 1950s' anti-communist rant?

Come on you can do better than that surely?

I think the girls did just fine, shooting. Stewart didn't do so well as a videographer, some details were contradictory: for example his justification for either style weapon at the expense of the other was pretty weak; a shotgun and buckshot at home defense distances is very effective and a few gun authorities favor it under many circumstances.

I think you know that.

Some people are just repelled by guns and some are repelled by the rougher element of firearms fans. In the past, common marketing wisdom might have been to avoid controversy; Mills sells firearms and accessories, but as part of their business strategy, not as a political statement. Those that don't like guns don't have to go near that part of the store, but now Stewart may make some uncomfortable.

I think it was a bad move. If Mills really wanted to make a point, perhaps he could have hired a local outdoorsperson to narrate: I think viewers would connect guns, shooting sports, and fleet farm, but not Stewart Mills. But then maybe he kinda wanted his moment.

As others point out, Mills did get a nice public relations boost for the range, though. I'll have to check it out; I wonder if they have a rimfire league.

Just like before the election when they said Obama wouldn't go after gun rights in his 2nd term? Now Biden says they will use an executive order if they have to. I never said anything about communism or socialism but it sure must be on your mind. What my comment was about is power. And if you don't think they care about having power over us then tell me why their are 10-25 term congress people out there

1.4 billion rounds of ammunition.
420m rounds .40 hollow points
200m rounds .223 rifle ammo
rounds of 308

plus more
Mr. Tiger please tell us why they are buying all this ammo?
I may be off of some of the numbers but, someone please
explain why our taxes are paying for all this ammo ?

Why does Homeland Security need so many rounds of ammo?