The Dec. 21 Brainerd Dispatch published a guest opinion titled, “Why Was God AWOL at Newtown?” written by political columnist Robert Ringer. His title indicates that the Newtown gun massacre is an occasion for asserting that if God exists he was not on the job expected of a God. Ringer’s first observation is that most other observers make what is basically simple too complicated. Thus his opening premise: “Bad things happen. It’s an inescapable reality of life.”
Next Ringer turns to exploring the “age old spiritual and philosophical question of, ‘Why does God allow evil and injustice to exist in the first place?’” He has no difficulty accepting that evil and injustice were manifest in Newtown. Even secular philosophers would likely agree Newtown represents moral evil rather than a natural evil because it was a human act, not an earthquake or an accident.
But there is something about Newtown that makes many more people think about God than seems usual. Most of Ringer’s thoughts are a series of “If this... then...” propositions occasioned by some assertions of an atheist, A Jewish theologian, Time Magazine, and a Christian theologian. Ringer seems stimulated to search for answers. After citing prominent theologian Reinhold Niebuhr’s Serenity Prayer, Ringer concludes that the “The challenge is to understand which things are within our control and which things are not.” He offers no concrete suggestions.
Given the theological questions raised about God and evil, there is a curious gap in Ringer’s analysis. Ringer never refers to the Bible, even though the word God is found in the Bible over 4,500 times and the word evil over 600 times. Why does Ringer ignore it? Could it be that the Bible presents major difficulties for using it to formulate an ethic for gun promotion? Since Ringer cited Niebuhr, some exploration of what he wrote regarding God and evil offers some clues.
In one of his major works, “The Nature and Destiny of Man,” Niebuhr states that evil existed before man, but it was locked out of creation such that God initially called creation “good.” Humans were created finite beings biologically bound to nature. But humans differ from animals in that they have a unique freedom to at least partially perceive the moral infinite (God). This is coupled with a “free will” to love, or a will toward actualizing self-centered power. If the latter temptation leads to a decision to overreach the Creator’s limits, it releases evil into creation. It still does.
According to Niebuhr, a major element that tempts human beings to commit evil acts is anxiety. A major cause of anxiety is fear of violence. This anxiety in turn may predispose to more acts of violence, which creates more anxiety, and a vicious cycle may start. A means of trying to suppress this anxiety and the sense of insecurity is to increase personal power by whatever means possible.
In 1994, a respected theologian, Marjorie Suchocki published a book titled, “The Fall to Violence.” Building on the above Niehbuhr formulation, one of Suchocki’s main points is that a significant dimension of the “Fall” found in Genesis 3 is an act of violence against any part of creation. In the story the first object was a forbidden tree (“of the knowledge of good and evil”). Already In Genesis 4, “Cain rose up against his brother and killed him.” The means of personal power available for many is a gun. After citing a gun tragedy involving children, in her book, Suchocki writes: “Someone made the guns available to the children…Corporate greed for ever greater profits from gun sales results in an incredible proliferation of guns throughout American culture, all under the reasoning that if everyone has guns, everyone can protect the self from everyone else. All the persons in the chain share in the (moral) guilt of the death... The American obsession with guns and violence is our attempt to delude ourselves into believing that we can control the firing of our weapons, that we can confine our violence through channeling it into an arena or ring, and that we can turn the power of our televisions off, and so control the violence that we safely allow into our lives. But anxiety mocks our control. Violence, not death, is at the root of our anxieties, and our attempts to channel violence simply increases its ceaseless flow.”
Looking back 18 years, Suchocki was prophetic. The problem is worse. In her view, not only the people pulling the triggers, but also all others materially and culturally involved replicate the “Original Sin.” God never promised that he would interrupt free will to turn back a monster free will chose not to limit. The question is now is, “Where will we be in another 18 years?
Today there are an estimated 300 million private guns in the U.S. Half of the guns in the world are in our 5 percent of the world’s population. In some eyes, we look like a nation with an epidemic of anxiety about our own potential violence against one another. The size of monster we created will be difficult to quickly reduce.
Jesus admonished: “Do not be anxious...” (Matt. 6:25).He told us to pray, “Thy will be done, on earth as in heaven...deliver us from evil.” Heaven is where there is no anxiety. The Bible claims Jesus was uniquely compassionate, righteous, and innocent of the charges for which he was crucified on orders of a representative of the most powerful government of his time. Paradoxically, this historical injustice became transformed into a source of hope and comfort for millions, including many of those pondering the Newtown massacre. In a mysterious way, Newtown could occasion positive changes to change the course of violence.
Many people are skeptical about the biblical message and how it addresses our engagement with good and evil. But the Bible deserves a place at the table when interested persons ponder events like Newtown.
DICK PETERSON is a resident of Nisswa, a retired physician and a member of the Brainerd Dispatch Editorial Board.



Comments (44)
Add commentIf I have 16 loaded
muzzleloaders will that be the same as a large capacity magazine?
You, eyolf have confessed to a childhood that would make me wary of what you are capable of and the way you twist reality on the comments makes you seem a bit unstable. I do sometime fear the way you stalk me.
FnB
I guess the only way to deal with eyolf would be to take away his guns. He is exhibiting way too much anxiety on here.
"But what if I'm a "patriot-movement zealot" like Tim McVeigh, and choose not to use a gun?"
I think you're beginning to see the point, eyolf. Taking away guns won't solve squat. Only 1-2% of all mass shootings involve automatic fire. Sure, we can ban 30 round semi-automatic clips. They'll just bring 3 ten round clips. Problem solved. The point is, nut-cases will find a way around anything you can propose.
You often allude to the biblical material. What do you suppose this means? "You have heard that it was said to the people long ago, 'Do not murder, and anyone who murders will be subject to judgment.' But I tell you...."
Tax them
The solution is so simple, that I'm surprised that no one here has suggested it.
The NRA wants a police officer in every school, but doesn't have the means to pay for it. It would cost 138 million dollars a year to have an officer at every school in Minnesota.
I propose we meet the NRA half way. Add, say, $100 on every firearm sold in the US and 5 cents per bullet (these numbers would be adjusted as necessary). Also, since firearms need to be registered, pull all registrations and create a yearly tax (much like a property tax or a vehicle registration tax) of $10 per firearm. This would keep the coffers full in order to pay for the police officer at every school.
Make it a felony to transfer guns without registering them. Gun shows are often used to purchase guns without background checks known as the "Gun Show Loophole." Make it a requirement to register all firearms transferred within families. If grandpa wants to hand down his rifle to his grandson, then require a simple registration form that can be downloaded from the Internet or picked up at, say, Fleet Farm. Advertise these new requirements heavily. Make it stick with the American people, much as we advertise the dangers of smoking, that it is a FELONY to transfer a firearm without registering it first.
Further, place warning labels on firearms, much as some countries do on cigarette packs, pictorially illustrating the dangers of firearms. Do this with boxes of bullets as well.
And finally, make it a requirement that everyone who purchases a firearm, or has one handed down to them, is required to take a two-day training course (paid for by the generous people at the NRA) and then issued a certificate. This would have to be renewed every five years with a refresher "short course." This would be much along the lines of driver's training and renewing one's driver's license.
A common complaint is that everyone talks a lot, but no one has any suggestions on how to approach this problem. Well, here you go. Problem approached!
And I think you and fred
both need to be treated in a mental treatment center.
I think any non-gun owner who lives close to a gun owner should have to help pay for any ammunition used to protect them and should have to put signs on their property saying thast they are a gun free property.
None, unless you count practice,
and the US has never used an atomic weapon since WW2 but used a lot of ammo and testing to be ready and it was a deterrent to future war. My neighbors have told me that they feel safer knowing I am close and armed.
That pretty much makes your stupid statement irrelevant.
Who's running this Town?
It was reported that Chicago just reached it's 500th homicide this year. " Police Superintendent Gerry McCarthy called this milestone a "tragic number" that is reflective of the gang violence and proliferation of illegal guns that have plagued some of our neighborhoods."
This leads to the question, "Who's running this Town?"
Gun Owner
Who said I wasn't a gun owner? I certainly am, and I, along with our NRA brethren, am willing to shoulder the cost of a police officer at every school with the aforementioned fees. I see no one here making any better suggestions.
I can't believe the level of discourse on this board. I mean, using the Bible as a pro/con argument for guns? Really? My eyes start to glaze over immediately when I see people using a several thousand year old bronze age, desert tribe book to try to make sense of a modern, complex problem. Jesus was the Prince of Peace, or maybe he came not for peace but with a sword. Whatever. Blather on, Bible believers.
I come from a family of engineers and businessmen. When we say "all solutions are on the table," that means that we are adults enough to discuss ANY possibility that may have an effect on a particular problem, whether good or bad, ludicrous or practical. That's how adults solve problems.
I can't imagine where we'd be if the first automobile engineers listened to the arm-chair philosophers and Bible believers who said that "man wasn't meant to go that fast" or where we'd be if the first aeronautical engineers listened to the Bible believers who said that "if man were meant to fly he would have been born with wings." I'm assuming that's how the discussion would have gone with many of those on this board if they'd lived over a hundred years ago.
Think of the pride we gun owners will show when we know that we are protecting our schools with our gun tax. The irony of all this is the conservatives being for another government agency as large as the TSA, but I'm sure they can live with that knowing they're keeping our children safe.
We should all be interested in solutions, but you conservatives can't even get out of the starting gate. How shameful.
God takes care of his people
When I read what the other fellers had to read, I said to myself, "it's about time we got God back in here". People forget that this is a Christian nation with scripture in the constitution and deceleration of independence and we have the ten commandments to prayful supplicants in the best of school and the vouchers.
Steve bush you have the wisdom and point out that the unmarried mothers are one big part of the problem. God hates that thing and who can blame him? Some of them don't even know whose the so called "baby dadd" for cripes sakes!!!
But the real problem is the way we don't see the truth because of the libs and the democrat party and they're agenda. They would have us ignore the bible but we read it and again and again we see that god s trying to warn us about the need for are weaponry and to be armed and respect the 2nd and third amendments!
Imagine if Abel was packing. And ashach, meshack and abindigo- who'se to say they weren't protected by an angel of the future with an AR-15? And imagine if the lord himself and his apostles had been armed with weaponry-that whole thing would have turnt out different. God wants us to use that weaponry which is why he gave us the knowledge and skill to do so.
As for what the 2 and 3 amendment promise well the holy fathers who wrote the bill of rights new what they were doing and that weaponry would get better n better. I favor like michelll bachhmannn to use the AR-15 I agree it is a fine weapon. To start with we need these at church, doctors offices and hospital, day care center, schools. But if the evil-doers resound in kind, then we need to consider more perhaps small rocket launcher, perhaps in schools to start.
Read the scripture it's all In there!!!
SMTN
Aitkin
New Hairs...Ownership...Gunz...
Getting somewhere now...


With ownership, comes responsibility...
In other words...Not able to...Blame the other person...
With this, I provide the following...
Scared me in the assembly, by the way...
Fred A. -- not all "Bible-believers" can be lumped in
with the looney-tuners who reject science. You make some sound, logical arguments, but your judgment of all religious folks as non-scientific isn't well-researched or accurate.