By ROLF WESTGARD
The new 2012 World Energy Outlook from the International Energy Agency (IEA) leads with the statement that “The global energy map is being redrawn ... by the resurgence of oil and gas production in the United States.” The IEA goes on to project that by 2020, the U.S. will overtake Saudi Arabia to become the world’s largest oil producer. And by 2030 the IEA has North America a major oil exporter. New technology, involving horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing is unlocking tight oil and gas shale deposits, leading to this optimistic forecast.
This latest vision of an American golden age of energy independence is receiving wide acceptance and support. Ed Morse, head commodities analyst at Citibank, summed it in the Wall Street Journal. “The United States,” he said, “has become the fastest-growing oil and gas producer in the world, and is likely to remain so for the rest of this decade and into the 2020s. North America is becoming the new Middle East.”
Gov. Romney chimed in at a campaign stop in New Mexico. “We’re not going to have to buy oil from the Middle East,” he said, “or any other place we don’t want to. We may even be an exporter of energy, considering all our resources.”
Sadly, U.S. energy independence is still as much of a mirage as it was In 1973, when President Nixon called for a “Project Independence”.
The problem for natural gas is illustrated in the large U.S. fracking regions such as the Barnett, Fayettville, and Haynesville reservoirs. A report from geologists, Lynn Pittinger and E. Berman shows that most of these plays are not commercial at current natural gas prices because of the high cost of the wells and land, plus the short life and limited output of the typical well.
Their analysis indicates that the estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) per well is approximately half of the values commonly presented by operators in the major reservoirs. The average gas EUR per well for the most active operators is 1.3 billion cubic feet (Bcf) in the Barnett, 1.1 Bcf in the Fayetteville, and 3.0 Bcf in the Haynesville shale gas plays. At current gas prices, total revenue from the average well is much less than the $6 to $10 million capital cost of a properly cased fracking well and its operating and land lease costs.
In the most productive reservoir, the Haynesville, a Louisiana State University study reports that the average well completion declines rapidly and produces 80 percent of its expected recovery during the first two years of production. Thus estimates of the total U.S. natural gas resource could be at least double the actual economically recoverable total.
As to actual crude oil, U.S. production in 2011 was 5.7 million barrels/day (MMbd), and it will reach about 6 MMbd in 2012. Our demand is running 18-19 MMbd. Our output is a little over half the crude oil output of the largest producers, Russia and Saudi Arabia, and it is not likely to approach them in the future. We may even be passed in a few years by Iraq, whose vast reserves are more accessible to conventional drilling.
The limits of fracking for natural gas also apply to U.S. crude oil, although the higher relative price of oil improves the economics for oil production. But the total recovery percent from tight oil reservoirs like the Bakken Shale in the Williston Basin is in the single digits. There are also significant environmental issues with fracking wells, including high water use and possible contamination of ground water. We do have very large new oil discoveries in the Gulf of Mexico. But they are under salt at great depths where high temperature and pressure make recovery difficult.
As Dr. Tad Patzek, chairman of the Department of Petroleum and Geosystems Engineering at The University of Texas puts it, “we are no Russia or Saudi Arabia when it comes to producing oil per unit time.”
Conservation and efficiency have cut U.S. oil consumption by nearly 2 MMbd since 2005. Let’s not be sidetracked from those efforts by misplaced energy independence euphoria.
Rolf Westgard is a professional member Geological Society of America and the American Association of Petroleum Geologists. He is a guest faculty for classes on energy subjects at the University of Minnesota Lifelong Learning program. He has homes in St. Paul and in the Deerwood area.



Comments (31)
Add commentRolf Westgard (RW)
Rolf Westgard is a professional member Geological Society of America and the American Association of Petroleum Geologists.(GSoA&AA oPG)
Be specific
Vague insults don't really cut it.
New class
I have a new class in spring quarter. You can attend and actually learn something about oil geology.
Mr Westgard -Im afraid your little buddy on here is befuddled ,
bewitched or bothered by some self inflicted issues.
However some misguided readers around here do really believe ,
"Its NOT science/fact unless its on the Faux Entertainment Network "
Im afraid some of them could not even begin to comprehend the big picture , much less any of the component parts. (Science /Math/Logic not their cup of TEA)
To be certain there are many avid readers on here that actually DO look forward to reading relevant timely information coming from a very credible source ,as you obviously are.
Geologists Rock !
Mr. Captron
I thought you were Captron not Laptron.
Lap
tron does the hugs for Rolf.
Sad Lady & Unbalanced One , Speaking of Rocks
I would guess someone with Mr Westgards education & experience would scare you two off , back under your own cold respective rocks.
Or maybe your coven has residency restrictions on the mineral rights they claim ...
Cap
I would submit my education and experience is equal to
Mr. Rolf's, albeit in a different sector. I do find that it helps
to have a sense of humor especially about oneself.
Please excuse me as I have to get back under my cold, cold rock. It is fun in there.
Speaking of Education and Experience...
That was way better than
Dribble's caption, Johan. And chaptron, I actually agree with Mr. Westgard on many things he says, it's just his love of the dictator that sours me on him. By the way, chaptron your (Mr Westgards ) was bad. Clean up your spelling and punctuation before smartguy or another scholar takes you to task!
In addition to the Senior Center
you can read a version of this article in the upcoming January issue of the Oil and Gas Journal.
In reference to Dictator comment, Grover is...
A little Defensive Today...
In the News...
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/269435-norquist-calls-buffet-argument-silly-
http://www.startribune.com/politics/statelocal/180936501.html?refer=y
Ahhh, gee...
I was watching a tv program a
I was watching a tv program a while back and they were talking about Grover. They said his 'no tax' belief came to him as he was riding his bicycle when he was 13 years old.
Companies hiring
Rolf, last response was a good one.
Companies that are hiring;
UPS - 55,000 seasonal:
Sterling Jewelry -- includes Jared and Kay
Amazon-- 50,000 jobs seasonal
Grover
Now, at least, the bad guy is Grover, but why?
The paper that is signed to not raise taxes, is a pledge
to the people they represent, not Mr. Grover Norquist.
I know, that is hard to understand that there are taxpayers
that think there should be some serious spending cuts
before any taxes are raised. That game has been played
before and they never do the cutting.
I guess it is better to blame Grover than look at the debt
and quit spending . Look at the number that each family
will be responsible for, that is those of us that pay taxes.
Work record
Worked 35 years for 3 private companies. Only paid public employment was in the US Army.
Rolf
Work history
None of your business.
Purposed isn't biased
And you are not in any way biased purposed???? You throw out accusations of others like this somehow doesn't apply to you!
People throw out the word "theory" in a way as to insinuate that whatever it is isn't fact or is just someone's speculation. In scientific nomenclature the word "theory" is applied to something that has stood up to constant attempts to disprove and has many lines of supporting evidence -thus considered to be a correct picture of the way it is (and can be modified by new evidence - like Einstien's Relativity modified Newton's Gravity) - "hypothesis" is the word applied to new, untested ideas. Examples of scientific "theories": Quantum Theory (runs your computer), Relativity, Gravity, Light, Atomic (better living through chemisty), Germ Theory of Disease, Evolution.
From Wikipedia ---
"A scientific theory is "a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experiment."[1][2] Scientists create scientific theories from hypotheses that have been corroborated through the scientific method, then gather evidence to test their accuracy. As with all forms of scientific knowledge, scientific theories are inductive in nature and do not make apodictic propositions; instead, they aim for predictive and explanatory force.[3][4]
The strength of a scientific theory is related to the diversity of phenomena it can explain, which is measured by its ability to make falsifiable predictions with respect to those phenomena. Theories are improved as more evidence is gathered, so that accuracy in prediction improves over time. Scientists use theories as a foundation to gain further scientific knowledge, as well as to accomplish goals such as inventing technology or curing disease.
Scientific theories are the most reliable, rigorous, and comprehensive form of scientific knowledge.[3] This is significantly different from the word "theory" in common usage, which implies that something is unproven or speculative.[5]"
Oil Producers are Like Farmers
Price goes up - drill more wells. Price goes down drill more wells. It's very simple economics - supply and demand. It should also be obvious after reading Rolf's letter that the only thing spuring the frack boom is the simple fact that a gallon of gasoline is over $3.00. Some people seem to think that all we have to do is "drill baby drill" our way to cheap, abundant gasoline and liberals don't allow this. Newsflash: If it takes $3.00 (you know the cost of production) a gallon to spur the "drill", to make the supply, to make the price "cheap", what happens to the supply when the "cheap gasoline" prices are below the cost of production? How about, Duh, the price of gasoline has to be so high in order to spur the making of the supply that allows the fulfillment of the IEA's prediction. This was one of the simple points of Rolf's letter.
Hiding behind an alias
Most of the posts here are civil. But there are always a few like Purposed who use an alias to launch cheap personal insults which they would never have the courage to do under their real name.