What’s worse than planting 40 million prime crop acres with biofuel corn crops, laced with artificial fertilizers and pesticides, to provide just 6 percent of our gasoline supply?
It’s planting hundreds of bird and bat killing wind farms in the same corridor as the Mississippi and Central Flyways, two of the most important migratory bird routes in the Western Hemisphere. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), charged with protecting species under the Endangered Species Act, is evaluating a plan to allow a 200-mile wide corridor for wind energy development from Canada to the Gulf of Mexico.
The notion of a great swath of Midwestern wind turbines originated with oil tycoon, T. Boone Pickens, who spent millions publicizing his program. It was later abandoned because even with substantial subsidies, it was not competitive. Undeterred, the FWS will now consider permits sought by 19 federally subsidized wind energy developers for projects in the same area. These permits would allow constructing turbines (up to 400 feet tall) and associated transmission lines on non-federal lands in nine states from Montana to Texas. The turbine placements directly encroach on the migratory route of endangered Whooping Cranes and other bird species. Each of these permits would allow a project to “take” an unspecified number of birds, taking being the FWS euphemism for killing or injuring.
Nationwide, about 200,000 birds are killed by wind farms each year, according to the American Bird Conservancy. In California’s Altamont Pass, the Los Angeles Times reports the death count for golden eagles alone is “67 a year for three decades.” The wildlife service does note that the leading cause of death for Whooping Cranes is above ground utility lines, not wind turbines. But the service fails to grasp the irony in the fact that each new wind farm requires its own new network of bird killing power lines.
Bats are also hurt by the turbines. Pennsylvania’s 420 wind turbines killed more than 10,000 bats last year — mostly in the late summer months, according to the state game commission.
This new flyway assault on North American wildlife might be justified if it would relieve some national energy emergency. But there is no emergency as energy demand is flat, and there is ample U.S. electric power capacity. And wind energy wouldn’t relieve any shortage. Erratic and expensive wind power requires substantial taxpayer support, and wind power struggles to provide more than a low single digit percentage of our electric power. New wind capacity also requires an equal amount of backup supply, usually from natural gas peaker plants, to fill in the gaps when wind output is too low or too high to feed a carefully balanced electric grid.
As to environmental benefit, a new study from Bentek Corporation shows increases in CO2 emissions with the introduction of wind plants in Colorado and Texas. The Bentek study is based on actual results for the Public Service of Colorado system in Colorado and from the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT). The study found that the constant cycling of backup fossil fuel plants increased fuel consumption and harmful emissions.
Xcel Energy Inc. took responsible action when a wind farm’s threat to two endangered bird species was discovered. Xcel canceled plans to fund EnXco Inc. to build the $400 million, 150 MW Merricourt wind farm in southeastern North Dakota. There was another good reason to avoid this project. It didn’t make financial sense.
At wind’s U.S. average capacity factor of 27 percent, the Merricourt wind farm would produce about 360 million erratic kilowatt hours per year. At current wholesale power rates, that yields gross annual revenue of about $18 million. Annual interest, depreciation, maintenance, and operations for the project could total more than $40 million, although some of the loss is covered by taxpayer subsidies. American taxpayers and Xcel Energy shareholders and rate payers should offer thanks to the birds.
ROLF WESTGARD is a resident of Deerwood, a professional member, Geological Society of America and a member of the Brainerd Dispatch advisory board.



Comments (15)
Add commentHmmm
I'm still struggling to see a point to all these comments. It looks like yet more complaining with no viable solutions presented. Are we to take away from this letter that the best response is to do nothing? Rolf - you give me a headache.
Try Tylenol and then use nuclear or natural gas
From Carebear: "I'm still struggling to see a point to all these comments. It looks like yet more complaining with no viable solutions presented. Are we to take away from this letter that the best response is to do nothing? Rolf - you give me a headache."
The Prairie Island nuclear plant equals about 25 Merricourts without the need for duplicate power plants.
Not only is energy demand
Not only is energy demand flat we continue to waste AT LEAST 30% of the energy we consume.
That means we could mothball or at least throttle back some existing plants if we acted responsibly and started acting conservatively instead of just talking about it.
Acting responsibly
Right on, fish. But if our esteemed elected legislators in St Paul and D.C. can't act responsibly, how do you expect that from us mere mortals?
Jon Stewart
Did you see his sketch about wind and the threat to the ducks in the Everglades? The anti-wind dude was for protecting ducks, so they would be available for hunting.
just wondering
Can we put this bird kill number in perspective? So Rolf, since you obviously are the smartest guy around, please inform us how many birds are killed by cats & cars annually?
Wind farms hard on raptors
By Louis Sahagun, Los Angeles Times
August 3, 2011
Federal authorities are investigating the deaths of at least six golden eagles at the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power's Pine Tree Wind Project in the Tehachapi Mountains, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service said Tuesday.
So far, no wind-energy company has been prosecuted by federal wildlife authorities in connection with the death of birds protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. A prosecution in the Pine Tree case could cause some rethinking and redesigning of this booming alternative energy source. Facilities elsewhere also have been under scrutiny, according to a federal official familiar with the investigations.
"Wind farms have been killing birds for decades and law enforcement has done nothing about it, so this investigation is long overdue," said Shawn Smallwood, an expert on raptor ecology and wind farms. "It's going to ruffle wind industry feathers across the country."
Wildlife Service spokeswoman Lois Grunwald declined to comment on what she described as "an ongoing law enforcement investigation regarding Pine Tree."
Joe Ramallo, a DWP spokesman, said, "We are very concerned about golden eagle mortalities that have occurred at Pine Tree. We have been working cooperatively and collaboratively with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the California Department of Fish and Game to investigate these incidents.
Cats and windows
Cats and windows kill lots more birds than wind farms. But cats don't kill eagles. It's the other way around. The biggest turbine kill problem may be bats.
As I said if wind farms were really useful, we could live with the loss of birds and bats. But IMO, wind farms are a similar taxpayer funded scam to corn ethanol.
REW
Red Herring?
My dear Professor Moriarty, er, Rolf, you side stepped my question. Are you a closet politician?
Red Herring 2
if this is true, my apolgies to Rolf. He is obviously well educated and intelligent. However, nukes scare the **** out of me, (ask the Japanese) big oil robs us and cleancoal is a marketing slogan, not a reality. Some of us have major life experiences and preaching from the podium invites those who disagree to take a few potshots. The humor I appreciate, but there are always two sides to every discussioalso has it's issues, but what is better for the greater good for our country. Goodnight and I hope Rolf understands there is no silver bullet out there.
Answers
I don't know the exact number of cat and car bird kills but it is in the millions. I used to be a politician but was fired. As you note, clean coal is a myth. In Japan, tens of thousands killed by quake and tsunami; so far none by radiation. Big oil is a business like any other. But they can't run things the way they did in the early days, since they don't control the lion's share of the reserves anymore.
Nuclear fission is not a silver bullet. It is just a practical way to produce a lot of dependable energy without emissions. The spent fuel storage problem is difficult, but it can be managed with current technology. With some more research on breeders and thorium, it could become our major energy source.
Rolf
P.S.
As a Democrat I support the current administration on most issues. But on energy issues, the Democratic Party just doesn't get it.
Rolf