BY CAL THOMAS
Tribune Media Services
“How could this happen?” asked Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in response to the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya that killed Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three others.
The rioting by Muslims supposedly “inflamed” by a cheaply produced YouTube film about the Prophet Muhammad was cited as the reason, but we have learned the attacks may have been planned in advance, some to coincide with the anniversary of Sept. 11. What doesn’t Secretary Clinton get? The actions and statements of Islamic extremists have been visible for some time.
In his latest obsequious gesture to the Islamic world, President Obama wants to offer $1 billion in “debt relief” to the Muslim Brotherhood leadership in Egypt. The president apparently hopes Egypt’s leadership can be bought off and will then start behaving like us. The president appears to ignore Egypt’s crackdown on political opposition, its sending tanks into the Sinai, in violation of its 33-year peace treaty with Israel, and the persecution of Coptic Christians who are fleeing the country in droves. This is what America got in Iran, Egypt and now Libya when we helped topple dictators who were then replaced by radicals.
That these and many other provocations against America, Israel and the rest of the West bring no credible response from the United States encourages and enables extremists to ramp up their violent behavior. “Paper tiger” is the term Mao Zedong used to describe “American imperialism” in 1956. “Spineless amoeba” might characterize this administration’s response to outrages performed in the name of Islam.
Just as the amateurish video was not the cause of the violent attacks, neither was Mitt Romney’s critique of them. The Obama administration’s foreign policy has failed dramatically. A recent Wall Street Journal headline had it right: “U.S. Policy in Mideast Challenged by Assaults.” Coddling, understanding, bowing and submitting to extremists only leads to more violence. History has shown and common sense tells us they only respect and fear power and consistency.
What is the flipside of “peace through strength?” It is war through weakness.
Iran’s nuclear bomb preparations? This administration’s response is more sanctions and more diplomacy, though these have failed. Kill our people? Send them more money.
This is what we get when the administration denies statements from the Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamic leaders about their hatred for America, Jews, Christians and women’s equality. Do we not think they mean what they say? If not, on what basis do our leaders disbelieve them?
Tyrants enjoy telling the world about their intentions. It is how they recruit followers. Think Hitler, Marx, Lenin and Mao. Tyrants aren’t the real danger, though they are to their own people. The real danger is when the West fails to recognize evil and develop an effective response to it. Asking Israel to continue to “wait” while Iran builds a nuclear bomb is madness, especially when Iran’s president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who has described Israel as a “disgraceful blot,” has said it should be “wiped off the face of the earth.” Islamic extremists say what they mean and mean what they say. So why don’t we believe them?
Whether the Islamists are a small minority within “peaceful” Islam is irrelevant. If the bad guys are pursuing nuclear weapons and their minions are killing our ambassadors and citizens, what is there to discuss? What can diplomats do?
How could this happen, Secretary Clinton? You have only to look at the one you correctly described four years ago as “inexperienced” and not ready to be president. If you continue in denial, deny this: “And prepare against them whatever you are able of power and of steeds of war by which you may terrify the enemy of Allah and your enemy and others besides them whom you do not know (but) whom Allah knows. And whatever you spend in the cause of Allah will be fully repaid to you, and you will not be wronged.” (Quran 8:60, Sahih International).
Readers may email Cal Thomas at tmseditors@tribune.com, (c) 2012 TRIBUNE MEDIA SERVICES, INC.


Comments (11)
Add commentHow can this happen?
Easy when they can get by with it while reaping the harvest of our dollars in oil purchases and foreign aid.
How can anyone say it is a bad idea to be energy independent especially when history tells us so.
There never has to be a "CAUSE" with Muslims.
They never really seem to have a valid reason for their behavior. It's like they are a walking tinderbox looking for a spark!
Help
What is sad is that our administration and many others in this country do not understand and don't want to.
20 plus embassies burning and what have they said or done.
Worse, how much could have been prevented with some
daily intel briefings that were missed.
This whole mess is simply over their heads and they do not know what to do.
The missing daily intel myth
Of course the President is in touch. He communicates electronically via Skype, email and phone which are modern methods. He just doesn't answer the phone when Fox News calls!
How about the House going on a two month vacation? Don't you think they are in touch?
Look at us with our iPhones, iPads and laptops relaxing who knows where, or maybe taking a break at work, but always in touch.
Southie,
how about the president pretends he's The President of the United States and puts a stop to this nonsense?
This nation is a joke because of him and the people that support him.
Classic Cal Thomas -- why even bother to respond?
?? Let's not, and say we did. Pathetic.
Bubba
Typical deceitful far lefter."let's not and say we did." i.e., telling lies is just fine. When the truth bites you in the [filtered word] just pretend you are too thick headed to recognize.
Hey, Tom . . . do you really want me to recite, chapter and
verse, the reasons why I think you are thick-headed/wrong and I am right? Or . . . shall we call it a draw, and just know, somehow, that we'll never, ever even agree to disagree? I'm just curious how you'd prefer to handle it? Please keep in touch, sir.
Quick question for you, Tom. In what year was our amazing
American independence proclaimed (praise the lord)?, and in what year did we finally get our Constitution ratified? I think there were ten or twelve years between the two, more or less? When we examine the new "democracies" in the Mideast, shouldn't we also allow them a reasonable amount of time to figure out their own democratic ways of doing things? Why would we presume that we have all of the correct answers regarding their new democracy? (especially so much sooner than we ever figured out our own?) Hmmm? Things that make you say . . . hmmm.
Latest news...
-That our ambassador to Libya was on a hit list.
-Our flag over the embassy was lowered and replaced with the aggressors.
-Evidence supports that the attack on our embassy was planned .
-Our Sec. of State reply is "How dare them."
-Our President has remained on schedule for fund raisers and talk show/campaign appearances.
-Buffalo Springfield is back in the studio re-working the words to the song "OHIO."
Sorry Bubs, but these people have had hundreds of years
to get somewhere, be it a democracy or not. The only thing they've accomplished is a long trail of bodies, hate, violence, and poverty.