I am part of the 1 percent of the 1 percent. By that I mean that I am fortunate to be a wealthy American and I say, “It’s okay to raise my taxes.”
This Wednesday morning I was at the White House supporting President Obama in his call for Congress to pass the “Buffett rule.” This legislation — inspired in part by Warren Buffett’s exasperation upon learning that his assistant paid a greater percentage of her income in federal taxes than he did — would require anyone whose income exceeds $1 million a year to pay a minimum 30 percent in taxes. It would hit me hard. I haven’t finished my taxes for 2011, but in 2010, my federal tax rate was 21.4 percent; if the Buffett rule had been in effect, my federal tax bill would have been 40 percent higher. Some years, my taxes would probably be more than 50 percent higher.
Why am I okay with this? The answer has to do with simple math and basic fairness.
This country is running enormous and unsustainable budget deficits that will bankrupt us all if they are not narrowed - and there is no way to do that without both cutting spending and raising revenue. (Grover Norquist’s anti-tax pledge is pie-in-the-sky fantasy and dangerous demagoguery.) Everyone is going to have to make sacrifices as part of a comprehensive budget deal along the lines of Simpson-Bowles, with tens of millions of people getting smaller entitlement benefits, for example, and tens of millions of people paying higher taxes.
It’s not class warfare to say that people like me - who aren’t suffering at all in these tough economic times, who are in many cases doing the best we’ve ever done and who can easily afford to pay more in taxes with no impact on our lifestyle - should be the first to step up and make a small sacrifice.
I think most people agree with the idea of shared sacrifice, but for many, when push comes to shove, that principle goes out the window. I don’t kid myself that I’m making any real sacrifices. The men and women who have been fighting for the past decade in Iraq and Afghanistan — thousands of them coming home in coffins or missing limbs — are making true sacrifices. And when they enter the domestic workforce, they shouldn’t have to pay taxes at a significantly higher rate than the vast majority of millionaires pay.
Some critics of the Buffett rule point out that it would raise only an estimated $47 billion over 10 years, which is a sliver of the 2011 deficit of $1.3 trillion, let alone the national debt of $15.6 trillion. They’re right that this, by itself, won’t be enough. But we have to start raising money somewhere, and if it isn’t from people like me, it will have to come from people less fortunate than I am. Think of it this way: Every billion dollars not raised from millionaires is equal to a million average U.S. families each paying an extra $1,000 in taxes. That would be real hardship for a lot of families that, unlike mine, are struggling to make ends meet.
Other critics argue that there’s no need for anyone to pay more taxes, because our government is so ineffective and wasteful that we can generate the savings we need just by running it better. I disagree. While there’s always plenty of room for improvement, our government is actually quite effective and efficient. Our military and judicial systems and national parks are the best in the world. Unlike in countries where government corruption is rampant, I’ve never once been solicited for a bribe. And our police departments generally do a good job protecting citizens. My wife and I walk our dog in Central Park every night after 10 p.m. and have never feared for our safety.
I think that most people who complain about our government have no idea what they’re talking about because they’ve never been to a country with a bad government. I regularly visit Kenya (my parents retired there and my sister works there), I visited Ethiopia many times when my parents lived there, and growing up I lived for three years each in Tanzania and Nicaragua. So I’ve seen what life is like under corrupt, dysfunctional, underfunded governments. To quote Hobbes, it can be “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short.”
I am grateful for the effective government we have in this country, which is the absolutely necessary foundation for our wonderful capitalistic economic system that has benefited me so greatly. And I’m willing to do my fair share — in fact, more than my fair share — to help rein in our deficits and put this country on a more sustainable path.
The author is a hedge fund manager and a member of Patriotic Millionaires for Fiscal Strength.


Comments (18)
Add commentDid this article also appear in print edition of the Dispatch,
or is it only in my online version of Dispatch, targeteted to me, based on the subjects with which I interact online? Thanks for sending me a quick answer to my email.
What a wonderfully interactive site this is!!
indeed.
Of the 1%, By the 1%, For the 1%? Really? Let's not . . .
and say we did. http://www.vanityfair.com/society/features/2011/05/top-one-percent-201105
Bubba
Do you always talk to yourself?
"inspired in part by Warren
"inspired in part by Warren Buffett’s exasperation upon learning that his assistant paid a greater percentage of her income"
yeah because Buffet doesn't pay his taxes ....
What a crock of a letter.
If you want to pay more taxes because you feel obligated, then by all means, do so. But don't hide behind some empty "rule". Is what you are saying in essence is, "If I am forced to pay more in taxes, I will do so, but until then forget it!"
Sure, raise her taxes
Hopefully they raise taxes on those couple hundred hedge fund managers for the sole reason of making democrats start working towards actual real ways of correcting the budget problems.
The federal government would make more money if they added a $25 filing fee to tax returns.
"Obama paid a lower tax rate than his secretary,
White House confirms!"
"President Barack Obama's secretary paid taxes at a higher rate than he did in 2011 despite having a "substantially lower income". How's that Buffoon Rule working out for ya, Prez?
Darn pdnet
I so wanted to be the first to say that.
Earth to minne/lakelander.........
What Side Are You On?
For reasons unknown, 'pdnet15' wants to know "How's that Buffoon Rule (sic) working out for ya, Prez?"
The Buffet proposal was first proposed last August, and was the centerpiece of the President's next State of the Union address in January.
The proposal is scheduled to come up for a vote in the Senate next week, but won't be approved by the Republican-controlled House.
Uhhhh, mission,,,,,,
Obama's not following the plan here. Uhhhh, earth to mission,,,,, did you miss the news?
of course he's not following
of course he's not following the plan - he's following the current law. The Prez could easily use this as an example to support his proposal. Call it "example by absurdity'.
Obama's tax rate
President Obama's effective tax rate was 32.7%.
It is not possible for an employee earning $95,000 to pay an effective tax rate of 32.7%.
i have an idea
since it is the rich zealots that want to be taxed higher fine, lets tax them higher i am thinking a 98% tax for warren buffet and all the others like him who constantly speak out that taxes are too low close all the loopholes and see how fast they change their tune, the ones that think it is fine the way it is can keep their current rate, what i find objectionable is the taxes that are paid over and over again by us all just so polititions on both sides think they can spend whatever they want with no end and no conciquences.
The Problem
The problem with this thinking is that if everyone gives all the money they have it is not enough to erase the debt. First lets have the government show a real effort in controlling the debt and then people will step up and do there part. There is no sacrifice in Washington that I can see....its business as usual.
"Fair Share"
Why not have everyone pay their "fair share."
If you have to pay into the IRS, then your paycheck deduction is not enough.
If you receive a return, then your paycheck deduction is too much.
To get out of this mess, everyone needs to pay their fair share because everyone enjoys benefits, in one form or another, from government services that need tax funding to operate.
A zero entry on pay in/return line should be the goal.
Do as I say, not as I do.
We can't take the Buffett Rule seriously untill Mr. Buffett
pays the taxes he already owes and is fighting the IRS on.
Pres. Obama has a 20.5 % rate that he paid and took deductions on $48,000 that he gave his daughters. Each spouse can give $12,000 each to each daughter.
Please rich people don't use all the deductions available
to you and then you will pay more.
I am for a flat tax with no deductions.
As predicted,
At 6:13 PM this evening, on a party-line vote as expected, the Senate rejected consideration of the “Buffett rule", which would have imposed a minimum tax rate on those making more than $1 million per year.