Republicans color the abortion debate | BrainerdDispatch.com | Brainerd, Minnesota

Republicans color the abortion debate

Posted: December 8, 2011 - 10:57pm

WASHINGTON — Rep. Trent Franks established his credentials as a civil rights leader last year when the Arizona Republican argued that, because of high abortion rates in black communities, African-Americans were better off under slavery.

But the congressman doesn’t just talk the talk. On Tuesday, he chaired a House Judiciary subcommittee hearing on legislation he is introducing that would protect African-American women from themselves — by making it harder for them to have abortions.

“In 1847, Frederick Douglass said, ‘Right is of no sex, truth is of no color, God is the father of us all and all are brethren,’” Franks proclaimed as he announced what he calls the “Susan B. Anthony and Frederick Douglass Prenatal Nondiscrimination Act of 2011.”

Drawing a line from the Civil War to the suffragist movement to defeating Hitler to the civil rights era, Franks determined that “there is one glaring exception” in the march toward equality. “Between 40 and 50 percent of all African-American babies, virtually one in two, are killed before they are born,” he said, “which is a greater cause of death for African-Americans.” Franks called the anti-abortion fight the “civil rights struggle that will define our generation.”

Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., who, unlike Franks, is African-American and a veteran of the civil rights movement, took a different historical view. “I’ve studied Frederick Douglass more than you,” said Conyers. “I’ve never heard or read about him saying anything about prenatal nondiscrimination.”

Orwellian naming aside, the House Republicans’ civil rights gambit (which follows passage of a similar bill in Franks’ Arizona and marks an attempt to get an abortion bill to the House floor before year-end) points to an interesting tactic among conservatives: They have taken on a new, and somewhat suspect, interest in the poor and in the nonwhite. To justify their social policies, they have stolen the language of victimization from the left. In other words, they are practicing the same identity politics they have long decried.

Newt Gingrich, now threatening Mitt Romney for the Republican presidential nomination, tried a similar approach when he argued for the elimination of “truly stupid” child labor laws and suggested that students could replace the janitors in their schools. He further explained that he was trying to help children in poor neighborhoods who have “no habits of working.”

Developer Donald Trump, who owns a Virginia country club that counts Gingrich as a member, announced this week that he would join with Gingrich to help “kids in very, very poor schools” -- by extending his “Apprentice” TV reality show concept to all of 10 lucky kids. “We’re going to be picking 10 young wonderful children, and we’re going to make them apprenti,” Trump said. “We’re going to have a little fun with it.”

This “fun” might sound less patronizing if these conservatives displayed a similar concern for the well-being of the poor and the nonwhite during debates over budget cuts. But, whatever the motives, lawmakers and conservative activists were not bashful when they held a pre-hearing news conference Tuesday, standing beside posters directed at Latinos and African-Americans (“black children are an endangered species”).

“It is horrific that in America today, babies are being killed based on their race and based on their sex,” protested Penny Nance of Concerned Women for America. Other participants in the news conference suggested that Planned Parenthood is “excited to take money specifically earmarked to kill a black baby” and linked abortion-rights advocates to eugenics, euthanasia and the Holocaust.

These conservatives raise a good point about the troubling implications of abortion based on gender selection -- although the problem exists mostly in places such as China, beyond the reach of the House Judiciary Committee. Harder to follow is the logic behind the argument that African-American women are racially discriminating against their own unborn children.

“As John Quincy Adams so eloquently stated,” Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Texas, said, “how can we expect God to keep blessing America when we’re treating brothers and sisters this way simply because of their race?”

“This morning, you can walk into a clinic and get an abortion if you find out your child is African-American,” said Patrick Mahoney, a conservative activist.

If you find out your child is African-American? So a black woman would have an abortion because she discovers — surprise! — that her fetus is also black?

Before the audience had a chance to digest that, Mahoney began shouting about how abortion is “lynching” — frightening a child in the front row, who cried out and hugged his mother.