• Clear sky
  • 64°
    Clear sky

sponsored by Edina Realty

  • Comment

Is Sarah Palin’s moment over?

Posted: August 14, 2011 - 5:13pm

NEW YORK — The latest trend in the media world is “trending.” That is, monitoring what people are buzzing about and directing coverage accordingly. 

Just as the unspoken sometimes reveals more than the spoken, what’s not trending suggests more than what’s trending. In all the many thousands of words written in the immediate aftermath of the Republican debate in Iowa, two words were scarce: Sarah Palin.

But she wasn’t even in Iowa during the debate, you say. Correct. Her “bus tour,” idling since its last attempt to seize national attention, wasn’t due to arrive in Iowa until Friday. Then again, Texas Gov. Rick Perry wasn’t in Iowa either and his name was everywhere. Some political observers even dubbed him winner of the debate in absentia. 

This isn’t to say Palin doesn’t still have a loyal following. According to a recent survey by RealClearPolitics, which averages the results of several national polls, Palin ranked third behind Perry in second place and Mitt Romney in first. Palin barely edged out Michele Bachmann in fourth place by just two-tenths of a point. It is to say, however, that she was not then on the minds of many Americans. 

Despite her persistence as a hypothetical presidential contender in polls, could it be that Sarah Palin’s moment is up? Has she (finally) exploited “McCain’s Folly” to the extent possible?

Palin may still have a “fire in my belly,” as she recently told Fox’s Greta Van Susteren, but does America still have an appetite for Palin’s brand of politicking? Her months-long tease about whether she’ll run for president may be a savvy move if you’re selling books and cutting TV deals, but it’s not much in the way of leadership.

Eventually, when a tease goes on too long, fascination morphs into boredom. Or anger. The authenticity that Palin displayed in her early days as mayor of Wasilla and governor of Alaska has lost is luster from overexposure. Authenticity becomes inauthentic once it is commodified and packaged as a marketing strategy. 

There has never been any debate about Palin’s considerable star power. Full of personality and chutzpah, she gets credit for putting relative unknowns on the political map and for raising mountains of cash with a wink and the sort of fiery rhetoric that gets blood rushing to the amygdala. (That’s the section of the brain that relates to pleasure and pain for those of you who leapt to the wrong body part, if the right conclusion.)

But star power isn’t enough, as we’re witnessing in real time. President Obama beat the stars when he rose from community organizer and state senator to become U.S. senator before running for president. The tides haven’t risen as hoped, but the walls do seem to be tumbling down. With dismal news from London’s riots to wildly fluctuating global markets, this is no time for unserious, self-infatuated (maybe, winky) candidates. 

While serious candidates were prepping for the hard work of a presidential debate, Palin was announcing her intention to pop over to Iowa in her “One Nation Tour.” In an email to her fans, she wrote: “The heartland is perfect territory for more of the One Nation Tour as we put forth efforts to revitalize the fundamental restoration of America by highlighting our nation’s heart, history, and founding principles.” (Homeland Security reportedly has sought help from idle bloggers fluent in Palinspeak to translate the meaning of this sentence.) 

Good luck with that. Palin’s governing theory reads like a copy editor’s game where you stitch together random phrases to create something like sense. Her sashay into Iowa, meanwhile — showing up basically to show up — is testament to her inability to resist the spotlight. Or perhaps it is the flame. 

Time will tell, but what recent history already confirms is that Palin isn’t a serious person. If she had been serious about running for president, she would have completed her term as governor. Or, having left office, she would have spent her time hitting the books and filling in knowledge gaps so painfully exposed during the 2008 election. 

Instead, she hit the road in a series of moneymaking, self-promoting stunts and has succeeded in achieving the true American dream: fame and fortune. Good for her. But all those people who have written checks and invested good faith in their chosen one will be justified in feeling played like any other heartbroken victim of a terrible flirt.  

  • Comment

Comments (38)

Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
bugaleeno
57
Points
bugaleeno 08/15/11 - 04:48 am
0
0

Why not ask the question if

Why not ask the question if Barack Obama's moment over instead? He is the one in power and is failing with his policies which affect everyone in America. Palin is not in power and has no policies which affect no one.

schucker88
0
Points
schucker88 08/15/11 - 05:18 am
0
0

One word:

Hopefully.

ujulie07
35
Points
ujulie07 08/15/11 - 09:06 am
0
0

You Liberals wish

You Liberals wish

minnesnowda
17136
Points
minnesnowda 08/15/11 - 09:12 am
0
0

liberals 'wish'

that Palin WOULD jump in. It would tear apart the conservative vote even more. She might sell to a small crowd but she is not the person most people would choose to be making decisons.

Did you Palin lovers actually read and understand the article?
Because it's true. She's a series of sound bites, but not a leader.

Eager to hear more from Perry (TX.) People say that he's bound to flub up big time. Most TX residents would not vote for him.

Charisma is important in a candidate, but behind the shell there needs to be some substance.

rubbyk
1384
Points
rubbyk 08/15/11 - 10:51 am
0
0

Obama

He's a series of sound bites, but not a leader. Do you think he has found out that he just can't vote present anymore.

dean1961
1043
Points
dean1961 08/15/11 - 11:50 am
0
0

snowda

"Most TX residents would not vote for him."

Where do you get your info from?

stevebusch
3021
Points
stevebusch 08/15/11 - 12:02 pm
0
0

You can have B.Hussein, the

You can have B.Hussein, the empty suit. I'll take the nicely proportioned Sarah any time. With Barry's 40 percent approval rating,Hillary is already sharpening her knives and will be making her presidential challenge any day now. Poor Barry can't withstand the assault of two gals. Resident sock monkey is toast and will be unemployed for over 99 weeks. Barry's in Cannon Falls at this moment talking about jobs as though he knew something about having one.

GetaGrip
1162
Points
GetaGrip 08/15/11 - 01:58 pm
0
0

"Charisma is important in a

"Charisma is important in a candidate, but behind the shell there needs to be some substance."

This lesson has become increasingly clear during the past three years. Couldn't have said it better myself Snow.

jjWilsen
16
Points
jjWilsen 08/15/11 - 02:00 pm
0
0

In Texas

green cards qualify for residency and there are more "Rich People." :)

dean1961
1043
Points
dean1961 08/15/11 - 02:57 pm
0
0

Pretty funny chey!

Pretty funny chey!

jjWilsen
16
Points
jjWilsen 08/15/11 - 08:09 pm
0
0

What is next?

A official White House speech in Berlin?

lakelander
708
Points
lakelander 08/15/11 - 08:39 pm
0
0

Perry

I do agree with Perry's vote for the law providing HPV vaccine for teens in Texas. But then he was against it. So he is for government funded health care, unless someone complains. Mr. flip flop.

chuck
0
Points
chuck 08/16/11 - 05:17 am
0
0

PERRY

I voted for Rick Perry to Knock Out illegal alien protector Bill White

anniejo
65
Points
anniejo 08/16/11 - 10:41 am
0
0

With Hillary Clinton

With Hillary Clinton competing strongly for the Dem. presidential nomination, it was a given that the Repub nominee would be considering a woman as a running mate. In reliably predictable fashion, the conservatives made the wrong choice and went for gender over competency and a grasp of the issues, thus ensuring both defeat and Palin's multi-millionaire status. With the ghostly visage of George W. Bush hovering over Perry's shoulder, the Repubs remain firmly in la-la land. Ya gotta love it.

Cheyenne43
7900
Points
Cheyenne43 08/16/11 - 12:14 pm
0
0

They shoulda

put a dress on Pawlenty.

minnesnowda
17136
Points
minnesnowda 08/16/11 - 12:20 pm
0
0

not VP

I think Pawlenty will challenge Amy Klobuchar or Al Franken for a US Senate seat.

Michelle Bachmann won't take a 2nd seat like Palin did.

Question: In the Iowa straw poll it was Bachmann, Ron Paul and Pawlenty.

Why is the national media saying it's down to:
Perry, Bachmann and Romney?

This shows that the Iowa poll is meaningless.

Stuff is being dug up on Perry right now. Watch for some interesting stuff to be revealed soon. The state of TX is not in great shape. The few things going right he's stretching the truth on taking credit for. Most of the new jobs are minimum wage or related to Big Oil. Stay tuned.

dean1961
1043
Points
dean1961 08/16/11 - 12:35 pm
0
0

Snow

Perry and Romney didn't participate in the straw poll. In the long run, the Iowa straw poll is pretty meaningless.

minnesnowda
17136
Points
minnesnowda 08/16/11 - 12:46 pm
0
0

That is true Dean

However, the media DID exclude Ron Paul who did participate - and he came in 2nd. What's that tell us about the media bias?

Tell me your thoughts about Perry wanting TX to succeed from the United States 2 years ago? And now he wants to be President? hmmmmmmmmmmm

I watched the debate and I enjoyed Ron Paul's rants. He's not electable but he sure is in there to bring up some issues. Sort of like Ralph Nader is to the Democrats.

Cheyenne43
7900
Points
Cheyenne43 08/16/11 - 12:51 pm
0
0

Actually,

Romney and Perry did participate in the straw poll tho the former didn't campaign much (and likely won't for the IA caucuses either) and the latter was a write-in. Romney garnered 567 votes and Perry 718 as a write-in, both figurres considerably less than Bachmann and Paul. But you're right, it's a pretty meaningless exercise.

lakelander
708
Points
lakelander 08/16/11 - 01:05 pm
0
0

minnesnowda

secede...not succeed. They think he is successful as the governor of a state with a failing educational system. We would chase him out of Minnesota if our schools were as poor as theirs.

dean1961
1043
Points
dean1961 08/16/11 - 01:28 pm
0
0

Poor schools?

That is a funny comment lakelander, coming from someone who thinks 64% proficiency in science is outstanding.

Snow, I think the secession comment was nothing more than a soundbite. Garbage politics at its finest.

I like Ron Paul but I don't think he is electable either.

lakelander
708
Points
lakelander 08/16/11 - 02:45 pm
0
0

dean

Do your own research...Texas ranks consistently at the bottom or almost at the bottom of the 50 states. And can you wrap your mind around the fact that 64% is the highest school in this area and higher than 2/3 of MN schools? And where did your school rank? Mine was 10% farther down than Brainerd.
I am flattered that you pay so much attention to my musings.

pdnet15
15836
Points
pdnet15 08/16/11 - 03:14 pm
0
0

lakelander

If he did, it was only to help him fall asleep. While I don't think Palin is Presidential material, especially after quitting as govenor, I like Perry and Paul. I can't stand 'bama. A guy who talks about fiscal resposibility and then spends $565 million on Somalia, $20 million+ on the Statue of Liberty, and $1.1 million on his new campaign bus, which he doesn't even have the backbone to call it campaigning.

dean1961
1043
Points
dean1961 08/16/11 - 06:22 pm
0
0

lakelander

Not that it pertains to anything going on now...I attended Pine Center, Lincoln and Garfield Elementary Schools, Franklin Jr High and Brainerd Senior High. Brainerd born and raised.

dean1961
1043
Points
dean1961 08/16/11 - 06:23 pm
0
0

P.S.

Three of those schools no longer exist (as schools anyways)!

jjWilsen
16
Points
jjWilsen 08/16/11 - 07:49 pm
0
0

Pine Center/Riverton/Edison Schools

I think Pine Center closed along with Riverton in the late sixties.

When BHS opened , late sixties, Brainerd then had two full Jr. Highs (Franklin & Washington) grades 7-9, Edison, Lincoln,Harrison, Garfield, Lowell, Whittier, Riverside,Baxter and Nisswa grade schools K-6. Also St. Francis and St. Andrews K-7. Edison might have closed a the same time as Pine Center and Riverton, but I'm thinking more like the mid to late seventies.

agent33
0
Points
agent33 08/16/11 - 11:21 pm
0
0

I clicked on the link for

I clicked on the link for "1974 was the last year of classes in Riverton." What happened to that article?

agent33
0
Points
agent33 08/16/11 - 11:27 pm
0
0

Riverton

Riverton School was an awesome building. It was much older than most thought. My father graduated from 12th grade there in 1931 while I finished 8th grade there in 1957. It's a shame what was done to that building

Back to Top

Spotted

Please Note: You may have disabled JavaScript and/or CSS. Although this news content will be accessible, certain functionality is unavailable.

Skip to News

« back

next »

  • title http://spotted.brainerddispatch.com/galleries/543848/ http://spotted.brainerddispatch.com/galleries/543843/ http://spotted.brainerddispatch.com/galleries/543838/
  • title http://spotted.brainerddispatch.com/galleries/543833/ http://spotted.brainerddispatch.com/galleries/543828/ http://spotted.brainerddispatch.com/galleries/543823/
  • title
Out and About in Brainerd

CONTACT US

  • Switchboard 218-829-4705
  • Report News 218-855-5860
  • Advertising 218-855-5835
  • Classifieds 218-855-5898
  • Circulation 218-855-5897
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback

ADVERTISING

SUBSCRIBER SERVICES

SOCIAL NETWORKING