WASHINGTON — “He’s not one of us.”
That phrase, uttered in the fourth minute of what Scott Walker believed to be a private phone conversation, reveals quite a bit about the rookie governor of Wisconsin.
Walker believed he was talking to a patron, conservative billionaire David Koch, but thanks to the amateurish management that seems to be a hallmark of his governorship, he was instead being punked by an impostor from a liberal website.
In the recorded call, Walker praised centrist state senator, Tim Cullen, as “about the only reasonable one” among the 14 legislators who fled the state to deny Walker the quorum he needs to destroy the public-sector unions. But when the fake Koch offered to call Cullen, Walker discouraged him:
“He’s pretty reasonable, but he’s not one of us. ... He’s not there for political reasons. He’s just trying to get something done. ... He’s not a, he’s not a conservative. He’s just a pragmatist.”
“Just a pragmatist” — as if it were an epithet. “Just trying to get something done” — as if this were evidence of a character defect.
I reached the unacceptably reasonable and pragmatic Cullen by phone in Illinois, where he is hiding out from Wisconsin state troopers who, dispatched by state Republicans, had been at his home each of the previous two nights to try to force him back to the capitol.
Cullen had a description of Walker, too. “This is the eighth governor that I’ve worked with in one way or another — four Republicans, four Democrats —- and this is the first governor who takes a clear public position that he will never negotiate,” said Cullen, who served in Republican Gov. Tommy Thompson’s administration in between stints in the state Senate. The other seven were willing to take the 70 or 80 percent of what they wanted. ... That’s what you need to do to make government work.”
Cullen got a call from Thompson this week and is hoping his old friend will convince Walker to negotiate. But that won’t be easy. Under Walker’s tribal political theory, governing is a never-ending cycle of revenge killings.
“I don’t budge,” Walker promised the fake Koch. He explained that he would increase pressure on state workers by threatening thousands of them with layoffs. He said he considered planting instigators in the crowd to stir up trouble. He said he might offer to talk to Democrats — but only as a ruse to get them to return. “I’m not negotiating,” he said.
These are not the words of a statesman. These are the words of a hooligan.
Of course, Washington knows all about tribalism, as both sides giddily await a possible shutdown of the government this week. But Walker’s excesses show where this leads. It leads to hypocrisy: He called President Obama’s health-care reform an “unprecedented power grab” but then launched his own grab by attempting to end collective bargaining for public workers. It leads to falsification: He claims he campaigned on ending collective bargaining, but he did no such thing. And now, it’s leading to fantasy.
In his conversation with the phony Koch, Walker said that “before we dropped the bomb,” he showed his Cabinet members a picture of Ronald Reagan and proclaimed that “one of the most defining moments of his political career, not just his presidency, (was) when he fired the air traffic controllers.” That, Walker said, “was the first crack in the Berlin Wall.” And now, “this is our time to change the course of history.”
It takes some creativity to liken the air controllers to Wisconsin’s public workers, who are not on strike and have offered concessions. It takes even more creativity to credit the firing of the controllers (rather than, say, Reagan’s military buildup) for the fall of the Berlin Wall. And it takes gall for Walker to claim the mantle of Reagan, who compromised with Democrats and Soviets alike. Ask Tim Cullen.
“Reagan was able to work deals,” said Cullen, who was Wisconsin’s Senate majority leader during Reagan’s presidency. Walker, by contrast, is repeating the mistakes of Obama, who, Cullen thinks, overreached on health care. Even if Walker prevails, “it would be a short-term win,” he said. “If you do it with only one party, you often lose that 40 percent that’s in the middle.”
Contrast that with Cullen’s philosophy, which he says he learned from Lyndon Johnson: “Any person not willing to settle for half a loaf has never been hungry.”
Only a truly unreasonable man would say that Tim Cullen is not one of us.



Comments (19)
Add comment"He's not one of us."
I can just imagine what a real David Koch may have thought as he listened to the punked governor from WI tell him that someone wasn't "one of us". He might have put his hand over the phone and laughed thinking of how ridiculous it was that Walker would think that he and the Kochs were on equal terms.
Walker is being used just like Walker is using working class Americans as a stepping stone for his place in history and he's not even smart enough to realize it.
the blame game
A unionized public employee...a member of the Tea Party and a CEO are sitting at a table. In the middle of the table is a plate with a dozen cookies on it. The CEO reaches across and takes 11 cookies...looks at the tea partier and says, "Watch out for that union guy, he wants a piece of your cookie."
I am so sick of this
First of all, how mature is it to pretend you are someone else, and say things that are little more than entrapment by deceit, for the sole purpose of airing them to all your other immature friends?
Secondly, not one thing he said was wrong, illegal, or immoral. He is doing his job as anyone does theirs.
You all act like you "really got the goods on Walker" with this call, and not one thing he shared with your fake Koch was even remotely out of line...but boy, to read the stupid comments you would think he threatened to assassinate anyone that defied him.
All this scenario proves to me is that the liberals are a completely immature bunch of "punking children" that run from gimmic to gimmic. All they trying to raise the irritation level of anyone with common sense with each thing they do. Congratulations. I am irked.
Snowda, There has got to be
Snowda,
There has got to be some better jokes than that in your Libbie joke book.
I hate to break the news to you ultra libs
but more than half the country is thinking exactly like what Gov. Walker said. You better start to realize that you are the minority and your blabbering on here is not going to change the mindset of people that are sick of your ultra liberal agenda.
10 friends visit the same bar
10 friends visit the same bar each night to have a few beers. The bill for the 10 comes to $100, and they choose to split it according to the Socialist way in which they pay taxes; i.e. a proportional scale according to wealth.
- The first four (the poorest), pay nothing.
- The 5th pays $1
- The 6th pays $3
- The 7th pays $7
- The 8th pays $12
- The 9th pays $18
- The 10th (the richest) pays $59.
The 10 had agreed to this scale, and so they were content, until one day the barman said, “You guys are such good clients, that I’m going to reduce your daily bill by $20. From this point forward, you’ll pay $80.”
The group wanted to continue sharing the bill proportionally, so that the four poorest would still continue to drink free. But how should they divide the $20 savings among the six that had previously been paying?
Simply dividing the $20 equally between the six ($3.33 each) would result in the 5th and 6th getting paid to drink, so the barman suggested they distribute the $20 savings using the same proportional scale that originally determined how much each paid in the first place.
- The 5th would no longer pay. (He saved 100%).
- The 6th would pay $2 instead of $3. (33% savings.)
- The 7th would pay $5 instead of $7. (28% savings.)
- The 8th would pay $9 instad of $12. (25% savings.)
- The 9th would pay $14 instead of $18. (22% savings.)
- And the 10th would pay $49 instead of $59 (16% savings.)
Each of the six paying friends ended up in a situation better than before. The original four contiued to drink free, as well, now, as the fifth. However, upon leaving bar, something odd happened — they began to compare their savings:
- Looking at the 10th, the 6th said, “Hey, I only received a $1 of savings from the $20, while that guy received $10!”
- “That’s correct,” said the 5th, “I also only saved $1. It’s unfair he received ten times more than me!”
- “It’s true!,” said the 7th, “The rich always manage to receive more benefits!”
- “Wait a second,” argued the first four, “We didn’t receive anything at all! As usual, the system exploits the poor!”
The angry first nine circled the 10th, and beat him up.
The next night, the 10th naturally decided not to join his “friends” at the bar. Unfortunately, when it came time for the remaining 9 to pay their bill, between all of them, they couldn’t come up with even half the money needed.
LLR-- what's ultra-liberal
LLR-- what's ultra-liberal about having a good job, health care and a pension? That used to be the American Dream.
wolf-- Scott Walker is inaugerated as president in 2013 and declares the nation bankrupt, saying that the govt will no longer honor 'socialist' programs including federal pensions.
schlep-- I'll bet even the tea party guy is not amused that the CEO pigged 90% of the cookies.
Yeah, all those school
Yeah, all those school teachers and nurses are really scary people.
Or is it the police and
Or is it the police and firefighters you're referring to?
Cetainly barny, someone as
Cetainly barny, someone as well educated and 'intelligent' as you are can come up with a better argument than calling names. The demonstrations look pretty peaceul to me, albeit exhuberant.
Chey,
By Cheyenne43 | 02/28/11 - 01:12 pm
LLR-- what's ultra-liberal about having a good job, health care and a pension? That used to be the American Dream.
You know darn well that that is not the people I'm referring to when I use the term "ultra liberal" !!! I'm referring to the ultra liberals that have screwed the middle class just as badly as any of the ultra conservatives.
at least my joke was new wolfg :)
you have posted that 'joke' before, LOL !
that joke
I have yet to see a union member hire 50,000, 5,000 or even 5 people so that analogical joke is kind of dumb, especially when a lot of the tea party members are owners of businesses and have part of those 11 cookies.
Question, how long do public employees, welfare, mn care, wic last without tax dollars from the private sector?
Answer...Not long.
Question, can the private sector make it without the public sector? Yes. Of course it will be more expensive but it is possible.
Go ahead and tell me how nuts I am, how wrong I am, how its impossible, how stupid my comment is, etc etc etc etc blah blah blah blah.
I know public sector is needed and I know it helps keep costs down and I know it helps the worthless who choose not to do anything and it helps those who actually need it but we can function as a country without it.
Before you reply, actually think about it. Can we get health care without it, yup. Can we get our food without it, yep. Can we get our schooling without it, yup. Can we get housing without it, well I am living proof of yes.