Just how much money is being spent by the federal government that is wasted on duplicate services, duplicate efforts that states have already covered, or just plain wasting money on projects that continue to place a huge burden on our nation’s security?
How much? Well of the $3.8 trillion budget proposed by the Office of Management and Budget, $851 billion is designated for defense spending. A measly $820 billion is slated for Social Security programs. However, in that non-defense budget, one must understand that Homeland Security is given $68.9 billion and Transportation Security Administration gets $8.1 billion.
It would be easy to blame one political party or the other for growing government to such extremes that we eventually experience European-type insolvency unless we demand our leaders get a handle on spending.
We’ve been told by the two main political parties in this country that Social Security is solvent well into the 21st Century. Balderdash! All the Social Security Trust Fund has are I.O.U. promissory notes. All of the cash has been pilfered by earlier Congressional and administrations to prop up the overall government spending.
What’s the solution? First, cut spending.
Cut the Department of Education, a cabinet position created by James Earl “Jimmy” Carter, Jr., a Democrat, which spends $69.9 billion a year to duplicate the services already provided by the states. One-tenth of those dollars could be given to states to support local efforts to improve education.
Second, do we really need a Department of Homeland security? We’re spending $68.9 billion a year on this agency that swallowed up other government entities, including the U.S. Coast Guard. This cabinet position was created by George Walker Bush, a Republican, and does not include the Federal Bureau of Investigation or the Central Intelligence Agency, or the National Security Agency or any other rogue entity sworn to protect us from enemies foreign and/or domestic.
Republican Bush also created the Transportation Security Agency (the agency that gropes women and little children in airports) and that entity spends $8.1 billion a year to totally alienate frequent flyers.
There is a host of other agencies that could and should be eliminated, such as Agriculture (states that rely heavily on agribusiness are duplicating services and sending governors to China, Russia and other consuming nations around the world). Is the Department of Commerce really necessary?
I nearly forgot to mention the other agency that has literally cost our nation trillions of dollars with over regulation and interference in the free market: Environmental Protection Agency which was created by Republican Richard Milhous Nixon in 1970. The EPA employs approximately 17,000 people and is budgeted to spend $8.4 billion in 2013.
Now to the sticky issue of curbing the cost of Social Security, Medicare (parts A-D), Medicaid, and welfare. No politician wants to come within a football field-length of proposing cuts. However, in order for the United States to avoid a Greek-style financial meltdown, we must look at cutting costs and services. To ignore these agencies when cutting overall spending is to delay disaster.
I’ve talked about a few cuts in spending. Now comes the part about raising funds to eventually cut our deficit and the debt that is approaching $100 trillion when all — Social Security, Medicare and Defense — are factored into what we’ve spent beyond our income.
We must allow the Bush Tax Cuts to sunset. I know, Republicans are screaming bloody murder at that thought. However, when one takes an objective look at what we’ve been asked to do since the Bush Tax Cuts — fight two wars (Iraq and Afghanistan), support the addition of two new costly federal agencies (Homeland Security and TSA), and add a health care program that will bankrupt Medicare and the nation, it’s time to get real. If I didn’t know better I would conclude that the younger Bush was a liberal Democrat.
It’s apparent that the Republican Party is as liberal as the Democrat Party when it comes to growing the size of the federal government and spending the money folks in fly-over country send to Washington. Each party’s leadership has saddled our nation with agencies that are now causing us to face enormous debt on top of annual deficit spending.
What’s the solution? Each citizen of this great nation must send a resounding message to all of those candidates wishing to “serve us” in Washington that the gig is up and we demand governmental cuts across the board, a balanced budget amendment and quit the finger pointing. We’re onto the professional politicians and their political pandering.
Sources: U.S. Department of Transportation, Homeland Security, Office Of Management and Budget, C-SPAN, Social Security Administration.



Comments (20)
Add commentFinally
Something worth reading and commenting on.
I would tend to agree with some of your suggestions, but the EPA? Clean air and water seem pretty important. Are these services duplicated? Fully?
It is a nice thought that we could trim spending by eliminating duplicitous services (and we certainly should if possible). I would caution that we should be careful what we wish for and examine these agencies closely to pick up any slack that would be left by their disappearance.
TSA= Thousands Standing Around
8.1_ Billion US Dollars for TSA. Now there is an organization that wastes federal tax dollars. Unless your a frequent flyer you probably dont care much about this organization created by George W Bush at a time when there were not many alternatives. Phasing out TSA over a few years would be a good start. Maybe the NRA supports the TSA ,thats why the NRA is planning on spending 40 Million US Dollars to elect Mitt ?
How would one propose phasing these programs out?
When the Homeland Security was introduced I felt that it was an attempt to oversee Americans and another part of the government meant to control us. Many right wingers claimed that it would solve all of our terrorist problems here in the U.S.
Now I have no inside whether or not it it successful in that realm but one thing is true, it is another government program that has to find news headlines and create news in order to justify it's existence. As with all government agencies the hand is always out...(the military is a huge example of this and yes I spent 12 years on active duty) and it isn't because they need more money. The mindset is that if you aren't asking then you must not have any needs and if no needs then why be in existence.
So how does one make an elephant smaller? You can't.
You can't cut out of this mess without
Also raising revenue. Letting the Bush tax cuts sunset would be a good start, but just a start.
The magnitude of the problem in $$ dwarfs the usual far right solutions such as those offered by our "Foxy" editor--and it also dwarfs the revenues produced by most solutions offered by the left.
The biggest parts of the budget aren't TSA, or Homeland Security, or earmarks, or whatever your waste of the day program is.
Defense spending, medicare/medicaid and social security alone make up 2/3's of government spending each year.
Department of Education? 1.2% of spending. Homeland security? Less than 1% of spending.
We have to increase revenue in many ways, and find ways to cut current spending in every program--and we can't have any third rails. If we aren't going to cut defense spending and medicare/medicaid and Social Security obligations we are just #1'ing into the wind.
Other agency costs
Dept. of Agriculture = app. 0.75% of spending. Commerce Department--less than 1/2 of 1% of spending. EPA? Less than 1/3 of 1%.
Setting aside the issue that most of these agencies provide some needed tangible benefit for the country and it's citizens, even if they were cut completely we'd be taking tiny baby steps to fix the budget problems facing this country.
Neither major party has shown any willingness to face the reality that cuts in spending AND revenue increases are needed.
"Time is short to make cuts"
Because Keith knows that if the GOP takes over, there will an extension of the Bush tax cuts, war with Iran, skyrocketing defense costs and cuts to his Medicare and Social Security.
Go back to Eden Prairie.
If the crooked politicians hadn't "borrowed" all of Social Security's money years ago it wouldn't cost a dime today.
Israel will take care of Iran unless Obummer gets reelected, in that case he'll bomb them to save Iran. Those czars cost us way too much and violate the Constitution every day. Rhino is right about BOTH Parties being at fault but the lake/che/fishes of the world won't ever admit that.
I hope you ar enot serious
I hope you ar enot serious that the U.S. would bomb Israel. What have you been smoking, man?
As for the czars, I'm no fan of them either, but these positions have been around forever, (and no mention of the fact that Obama's predecessor had more czars than the current president: http://www.factcheck.org/2009/09/czar-search/)
Seriously: us bomb Israel? Wow.
Really, read the last paragraph -- a balanced budget amend-
ment??!!? I don't think so. I'm almost done with this blow-hard columnist (just before the Dispatch charges me to disagree with his constant flow of someone elses right-wing ideas). Here's something to read about BBA: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/post/a-balanced-budget....
Do the rest of you really agree that you want to pay for this? C'mon -- you can all do better than answer this right-wing twit every day. There's a better caliber of right-wing twits at The St. Paul Pioneer Press, which is still free. (Twincities.com) If the Dispatch starts charging, tell you what, the Mpls Star Trib. is a much better deal for any price. If they start charging before I can say g'bye to y'all, it been good to know you.
Morris Comm. needs a wake-up call
This is Minnesota, not Mississippi.
We like facts and cogent columns.
Not fox fantasy.
OK smartguy, I wasn't.
Obummer would let the Muslims bomb Israel and beg Allah's forgiveness.
so what war do you want now?
so what war do you want now? Was Iraq not good enough for you? (4,000 americans dead). Has Afghanistan become so drawn out that it is no longer worth your attention? Was our behind the scenes approach in Libya not front brazen enough?
Do you think Israel has no blood on their hands, either?
This is not a video game or the world of 1960. We can longer go in to this part of the world and push governments around. Technology and a realization of their resource's impact on world stability has caught up to those Middle East governments. . . like it or not.
Perhaps I should correct your post of: "Obummer would let the Muslims bomb Israel and beg Allah's forgiveness." Did you mean to say "Iran would let the US bomb its neighbors and beg for God's forgiveness?" There, another free correction for you. One of these day's I'm going to start charging. Good night.
Shalom.
Hey lakelandr
You liked it for years and years when all the BDD would publish was liberal editorials. Now there is a new voice..and you dont like it! Ha ha! Fox fantasy? You like that BSNBC "reality"? Minnesota not Mississippi..funny stuff!
Allowing the Bush tax cuts to expire is fine if there is reductions in spending to retire the debt. But that wont happen as long as libs have a money source they will spend it. Cut, cut, and then cut some more. I really think most people would not mind paying higher taxes if the end result was cutting the debt. But can you really imagine democrats getting billions more each year in revenue and not finding some social "crisis" that needs "fixing"? I cant.
The National Mess
Washington, DC, has over 500 officials in elected office who have been rendered totally ineffective through the divisiveness created by the conservative/liberal label they attach to themselves. Therefore, the ability to compromise to solve problems is lost because of the influence created by the non-elected liberal/conservative power and money that flows to those in office who wear the correct label. We are caught in a vicious cycle as never seen before in history of this country.
You know its gotten bad when...
they won't even pay their prostitutes.
But then, maybe that's just the Obama administration's war on women.
Tell me the BDD is conservative,
ha ha.
Good one trip!!!
& dont let the door hit you in the you-know what bubba gump!! I will pay & plus I buy the paper every morning except some Sundays.
The elimination of
The elimination of duplications within the O’ Bama Administration is already being handled by the tsar of the Department of Redundancy Department tsar. As Joe Biden likes to say: "Throwing another $69.9 million at our miserable public ed system is no big (deleted word) deal.
so what war do you want now?
A war on liberalism would be nice. It should be stamped out like any other nasty disease.
Now that was some valuable free advice there! As for paying you, my taxes have been doing that for years and I'd like you to start actually earning them.
Good Night to you too.
I will propose to you what I
I will propose to you what I have proposed to the other naybobs of negativity: If you insist that I have not earned my income (without any shred of personal observation, mind you), I will gladly refund you the 1/2 a cent that you may have paid on my salary.
And like a dandelion emerging from the lawn, FNB's revelation that he is far from 'fair and balanced" becomes more and more obvious.
Time to up the anti on the Weed B Gon