Current weather

  • Clear sky
  • 73°
    Clear sky

sponsored by Grand Casino

  • Comment

Santorum shows strength in Crow Wing County

Posted: February 7, 2012 - 11:56pm

BAXTER — Brainerd area Republicans heard presidential campaign pitches from each of the four candidates at Tuesday’s caucuses, and Crow Wing Township proved to be a fairly accurate indicator of Rick Santorum’s strength in Minnesota.

The former U.S. senator from Pennsylvania was the overwhelming choice of Crow Wing Township after more than a dozen Brainerd area Republican precincts broke into individual groups at Forestview Middle School.

Before the break-out meetings were convened four speakers urged support for their favorite candidates. Sue Hilgart of Brainerd championed Santorum’s candidacy. She read a statement which made reference to Santorum being labeled “a Tea Party guy before there was a Tea Party.” She cited his pro-life and pro-family stances.

“Rick Santorum has the courage to fight for America,” she said.

She must have convinced the GOP faithful in Crow Wing Township. Their presidential tally in the non-binding vote was Santorum, 12; former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, 4; Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, 3; and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, 2.

The totals for the presidential preference tally in Crow Wing County were not available at 10 p.m. Tuesday.

When Sue Kern sat down at the Crow Wing Township table she was the one who opened the manila envelope. As a result she became the precinct convener and then later was elected permanent chair.

“I won because I opened the envelope,” she said.

The township passed resolutions directing the GOP to follow the U.S. Constitution in governing; and to support the concept of marriage as a union of one man and one woman. In addition the precinct passed a motion directing its seven delegates to carry a pocket copy of the U.S. Constitution with them to the Crow Wing County convention on Feb. 25 at Central Lakes College.

In discussion Erik Jaehnert urged his fellow Republicans not to be afraid to support candidates like Paul and Santorum.

“I hope we all get back to fiscal conservatism,” he said. “We need to get rid of Barack.”

He said he had been discouraged when Republicans nominated Sen. John McCain, four years ago.

“So much is wrong with the Republican Party today,” he said.

At the outset of the meeting all of the presidential candidates had supporters speak on their behalf.

Peggy Erickson said Gingrich would repeal Obama’s health care law and reduce the size of government.

Rod Thoe of Fort Ripley said he believed Romney would win the nomination but said he’d support Paul. He said Paul’s supporters must not be disrespected or it could cause a fracture in the party. In his view, Santorum couldn’t win in Pennsylvania and Gingrich was too surly.

Paul, he said, represented the constitutional/libertarian side of the Republican Party. He said the nation is driving off a cliff and Paul is the one guy who is willing to put on the brakes.

Speaking for Romney, Paul Hirst of Brainerd said the former governor is the one candidate with the depth and breadth of experience who has detailed plans for when he takes office. Romney, he said, has a great family and is a great husband and father who wouldn’t do anything to embarrass the country.

Sen. Paul Gazelka, R-Brainerd, came to the caucus from a Santorum event in the Twin Cities but said he will back whoever wins the GOP nomination.

“Minnesota has begun to head in the right direction,” he said, changing the focus from the national to the state political scene. He cited environmental reforms and a streamlined permitting process designed to help businesses.

Gazelka was one of several area lawmakers who announced their support for Santorum Tuesday. Listed on a Minnesota endorsement list were Gazelka, Sen. Bill Ingebrigtsen, R-Alexandria; Sen. John Carlson, R-Bemidji; and Rep. Mike LeMieur, R-Little Falls.

MIKE O’ROURKE may be reached at 855-5860 or mike.orourke@brainerddispatch.com.

  • Comment

Comments (18)

Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
dutchman7
126
Points
dutchman7 02/08/12 - 12:50 am
0
0

Not a surprise locally, however, National is another matter.

Guess what?
Rick isn't a huge favorite among Independent and Moderate voters nationwide.
Those are the nationwide voters who matter and swing elections.

graydo
0
Points
graydo 02/08/12 - 08:29 am
0
0

National is just fine, thanks

Check out the national favorability results from polling. Santorum, by a substantial margin, has the best favorable/unfavorable ratings of the Republican candidates. And he's running ahead of Obama head to head. The small clique of Santorum haters is gnashing their teeth.

jjWilsen
0
Points
jjWilsen 02/08/12 - 09:06 am
0
0

You can tell

who is a threat to the DFL when the billion dollar war chest goes to work and the barking frogs begin to croak.

lakelander
147
Points
lakelander 02/08/12 - 09:17 am
0
0

Did Paul fail to mention MN Gop's other campaign issues?

“Minnesota has begun to head in the right direction,” he said, changing the focus from the national to the state political scene. He cited environmental reforms and a streamlined permitting process designed to help businesses.

Right to work, gay marriage amendment, voter id, MN Gop party's fiscal problems

Did the GOP caucus discuss these issues?

lakelander
147
Points
lakelander 02/08/12 - 09:25 am
0
0

Mike O'Rourke

How many attended, Mike?

sadiemarriedlady
23
Points
sadiemarriedlady 02/08/12 - 09:34 am
0
0

What happened?

I guess it depends on which caucus you were in.
I would say that most people know and understand
the issues. There were quite a few new people there
who were concerned about the recent Catholic/religious
birth control mandate.

GetaGrip
16
Points
GetaGrip 02/08/12 - 11:22 am
0
0

Lake - It appears that this

Lake - It appears that this is the only drumbeat you know. Could you strike up another tune? You seem like a somewhat intelligent person, so why do you day-after-day prove to the readers of this forum your inanity for anything that requires critical thinking? Here I'll help you build some skill in the area. Go to this website and see that your daily demagoguery is without merit and represents a VERY small fraction of the legislative agenda. https://www.revisor.mn.gov/revisor/pages/search_status/status_search.php.... It is obvious that you are very adept at getting your information from the liberally controlled mainstream media and equally adept at parroting everything you hear from those sources. Perhaps you never really learned the concept of "separating the wheat from the chaff" - allegorically speaking of course. Or perhaps you have some sick fantasy to become the first ever progressive political zombie - "dead from the neck up". Oh wait, there are already number of you out there. Bottom line.....do your own research and your own thinking. You could make America a better place.

lakelander
147
Points
lakelander 02/08/12 - 11:46 am
0
0

brilliant!

you figured me out, getagrip!

GetaGrip
16
Points
GetaGrip 02/08/12 - 12:12 pm
0
0

Thanks.....doesn't take much.

Thanks.....doesn't take much.

minnesnowda
246
Points
minnesnowda 02/08/12 - 12:24 pm
0
0

Legislating by amendment

allows our elected legislators to by pass personal responsibility for legislating (doing their job) by offering ballot amendments for citizens to decide.

The questions are hard to understand and the language is vague. "Right to Work" "Gay Marriage" "Voter ID." How many citizens do their homework on these issues? Isn't that the job of our legislature to govern wisely?

Why are they even there then? In this case they are attempting to bypass a veto by Governor Dayton, who knows that these are hot buttons and now we discover that if they are passed in November - they may be ruled unconstitutional by the federal government because they discriminate.

mav7770
0
Points
mav7770 02/08/12 - 01:05 pm
0
0

Santorum? Really?

God help us!

tripwire3
120
Points
tripwire3 02/08/12 - 01:28 pm
0
0

Snowbank

How is "right to work" discriminitory?

GetaGrip
16
Points
GetaGrip 02/08/12 - 02:14 pm
0
0

Curious BDD.....why was my

Curious BDD.....why was my post removed? Did you find that the presentation of facts were a bit over the top for candid discussion, or did I hurt Lake's feelings?

chuck
0
Points
chuck 02/08/12 - 02:53 pm
0
0

Santorum If he's elected

Santorum If he's elected president I hope you will never have a need for medicare,he has stated his intention to make cuts to the program,he also lost his bid for re-election by the largest margin of any senator in history,I wonder what the folks in Pennsylvania know ?

tripwire3
120
Points
tripwire3 02/08/12 - 03:38 pm
0
0

Charles

Just curious, tell me how we are going to get ourselves out of the fiscal mess we are in without cutting Medicare. It may be that he is the only one with the cahones to state publicly what we all intuitively know.

MNMan114
0
Points
MNMan114 02/08/12 - 10:29 pm
0
0

Caucus Voting

I showed up at Forestview School at about 745 thinking I could still vote and walked in to see the tables split into the different precincts and no one by the door at that time to tell me where I should go (I realize the caucus ended at 8 but still would of been nice to get a vote in)
Do you think Crow Wing County will be doing like some of the cities down south and using computers to sign in where all you need to do is swipe your drivers license?

marsbar
0
Points
marsbar 02/09/12 - 12:43 am
0
0

voting till 8 pm at the DFL caucus

Voting closed at 8pm but everyone attending got to vote. :)

A tradition we should keep in Minnesota, citizens being allowed to vote!

AH
0
Points
AH 02/10/12 - 11:45 am
0
0

HEY MINNESNOWDA

How is right to work discriminatory?

And what exactly is wrong with having to show ID to vote? You have to show it to buy medications, but not to elect people to leadership?

Back to Top

Get Daily Deals by Email!

Enter your email address.


Spotted

Please Note: You may have disabled JavaScript and/or CSS. Although this news content will be accessible, certain functionality is unavailable.

Skip to News

« back

next »

  • title http://spotted.brainerddispatch.com/galleries/540588/ http://spotted.brainerddispatch.com/galleries/540583/ http://spotted.brainerddispatch.com/galleries/540578/
  • title http://spotted.brainerddispatch.com/galleries/540568/ http://spotted.brainerddispatch.com/galleries/540573/ http://spotted.brainerddispatch.com/galleries/540558/
  • title
Cathy Nault Riverside Retirement

CONTACT US

  • Switchboard 218-829-4705
  • Report News 218-855-5860
  • Advertising 218-855-5835
  • Classifieds 218-855-5898
  • Circulation 218-855-5897
  • Vox Pop 218-855-5888
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback

ADVERTISING

SUBSCRIBER SERVICES

SOCIAL NETWORKING