NEW YORK (AP) — Without running water or working toilets, the crowded anti-Wall Street encampments across the country are not the most pleasant-smelling places to live. Nor are they quiet, with drumming and chanting echoing through the air at all hours of the night.
That's why police and neighbors in some cities are starting to lose patience with the protesters, who are preparing to settle in for the winter months.
In Oakland, Calif., police in riot gear fired tear gas and bean bags before daybreak Tuesday to disperse about 170 protesters who had been camping in front of City Hall for the past two weeks, and 75 people were arrested.
The mayor of Providence, R.I., is threatening to go to court within days to evict demonstrators from a park.
And businesses and residents near New York's Zuccotti Park, the unofficial headquarters of the movement that began in mid-September, are demanding something be done to discourage the hundreds of protesters from urinating in the street and making noise at all hours.
"A lot of tourists coming down from hotels are so disgusted and disappointed when they see this," said Stacey Tzortzatos, manager of a sandwich shop near Zuccotti Park. "I hope for the sake of the city the mayor does close this down."
She complained that the protesters who come in by the dozen to use her bathroom dislodged a sink and caused a flood, and that police barricades are preventing her normal lunch crowd from stopping by.
In Philadelphia, city officials have been waiting almost two weeks for Occupy Philly to respond to a letter containing a list of health and safety concerns. City Managing Director Richard Negrin said officials can't wait much longer to address hazards such as smoking in tightly packed tents, camp layouts that hinder emergency access, and exposure to human waste.
"They just can't ignore us indefinitely," Negrin said Tuesday. "Every day that they haven't addressed these public safety concerns simply increases the risk."
Stephen Campbell, a protester in Boston, said the troublemakers are the minority.
"We have a policy here: no drugs, no alcohol," he said. "Us occupiers really try to stick true to that. Other people who move in, who maybe have an alcohol problem or a drug problem, you know, we're not fully equipped to handle things like that."
City officials in Oakland had initially been supportive of the protesters, with Mayor Jean Quan saying that sometimes "democracy is messy." But tensions reached a boiling point after a sexual assault, a severe beating and a fire were reported and paramedics were denied access to the camp, according to city officials. They also cited complaints about threatening behavior and concerns about rats, fire hazards and public urination.
When police moved in, they were pelted with rocks, bottles and utensils from people in the camp's kitchen area, but no injuries were reported. Protesters were taken away in plastic handcuffs, most of them arrested on suspicion of illegal lodging.
Protesters disputed the city's claims about conditions at the camp. Lauren Richardson, a college student from Oakland, said that volunteers collected garbage and recycling every six hours, that water was boiled before being used to wash dishes, and that rats had infested the park long before the camp went up.
"It was very neat. It was very organized," Richardson said.
In New York, the neighborhood board voted Tuesday night to pass a resolution that proposed off-site portable bathrooms funded by local donors, said Julie Menin, head of the board. The resolution also requested that loud noises, like the blast of air horns and group chanting, be limited to two hours during the day.
"Drumming has been going on late at night," she said.
The park's owner, Brookfield Office Properties, tried to push the protesters out two weeks ago to clean it but backed off at the last minute after a public outcry.
Menin said the neighborhood does not believe the protesters should be kicked out. "We do not want the city to use force in any way," she said. "And we think it's possible to address quality-of-life issues."
In Minneapolis, Hennepin County Commissioner Jeff Johnson said some constituents who work downtown are getting a little tired of the piles of belongings cluttering the plaza, while others are worried about escalating costs. The sheriff's department has already spent more than $200,000, most of that in overtime. About 100 to 150 demonstrators crowd the plaza during the day.
"I think most people I talk to are either supportive or understanding of people's right to say what they want and hold a protest or a rally, but when you start looking at the costs and how this is stringing out, it is wearing on some people's patience," Johnson said. "At first it looked like they were having a rally or trying to make a statement, but now it just looks like a game to them. Most people don't support that."
Fariyal Lakhani, owner of a kiosk next to an Atlanta park where a few dozen protesters have camped out, said people aren't buying candy bars and sodas, or they want things for free or at a steep discount.
"We're very upset," Lakhani said. "There's no business. Too much argument."
A 7-Eleven one block from the protests in Portland, Ore., reported a higher-than-normal $6,000 in shoplifting since the protest began Oct. 6. The store has added a security guard.
In Providence, Public Safety Commissioner Steven Pare initially said he would give the activists two or three days to remain in Burnside Park without a permit. But Monday night marked the 10th night of the encampment, now consisting of more than 100 tents. City officials said the grass is getting damaged, and they want to close the restrooms and prepare the park for winter.
In Washington, protesters in McPherson Square and Freedom Plaza appear to be getting along with the police and the neighbors.
One activist, Wes Kirkpatrick, said he believes the demonstration in McPherson Square is benefiting from its location just blocks from the White House, and he does not expect the federal government to crack down. "It would be hypocritical for Obama to do anything because he legitimized our grievances publicly," he said.
McPherson Square is surrounded by banks, restaurants, law firms and other businesses. Ayanna Brown, general manager of the popular restaurant Georgia Brown's, said the protesters don't even come in and ask to use the restroom. And Patrick Segui, who owns a hair salon at McPherson Square, said his business hasn't suffered.
"As far as protesting, that's the way to do it. They're very clean," Segui said. "Politically, it's a different story, but we don't need to go there."
___
Associated Press Writers Verena Dobnik and Deepti Hajela in New York; Amy Forliti in Minneapolis; Ben Nuckols in Washington; Jay Lindsay in Boston; Marcus Wohlsen in Oakland, Calif.; Harry R. Weber in Atlanta; Erika Niedowski in Providence, R.I.; Nigel Duara in Portland, Ore.; and Kathy Matheson in Philadelphia contributed to this report.
Copyright 2011 The Associated Press.



Comments (13)
Add comment"Fariyal Lakhani, owner of a
"Fariyal Lakhani, owner of a kiosk next to an Atlanta park...said people aren't buying candy bars and sodas, or they want things for free or at a steep discount."
A bunch of self-entitled, spoiled brats!
I heard that in New York, the various groups are now fighting over their "fair share" of the approx. $500K in donations that have been received.
No surprise there, eh?
"A bunch of self-entitled,
"A bunch of self-entitled, spoiled brats!" wolfy.
Says the man who thinks taxpayers should bail out another billionaire who made a bad business decision and now has his hand out for $300,000,000 in wilfare.
bad business decision?
Fish,
What was this bad business decision you keep bringing up?
I find it interesting that the protesters
dont feel its their responsibility to clean up after themselves nor do they respect others right to peace and quiet. They act like little more than children that want everyone else to pick up after them, feed them, and open their wallets and take care of them.
While I feel badly that the US Vet was injured in Oakland, its one of those "at the wrong place at the wrong time" scenarios. If he had been at work he wouldn't have been injured.
352
I totally agree with you. I have all the respect for the protester's right to protest, though they showed little to the Tea Partiers, but there does come a time when common sense ans decency should prevail. Wolfg1 says it perfectly; spoiled brats! And fish, what is wilfare? I am assuming you mean welfare. But whom are you babbling about, and do you have any links to prove you're not just blowing bubbles in the bathtub?
352
There is also unemployment among returning vets. I wonder what the rate is in Brainerd.
And those Tea Party rallies where they toted their guns were threatening in a way carrying a Starbucks coffee mug is not.
Lake - Explain "toted their
Lake - Explain "toted their guns were threatening". How was this done in a threatening manner at the Tea Party rallies?
Erect a fence
around them and let them protest in their own filth and fight for food and water with the rats. Soon a pecking order will establish and the strong will rule over the weak. A real life lesson of how nature works.
Too funny
These occupy groups are a great source of entertainment.
I read the people enjoying donated food in Zuccotti Park are angry at homeless people trying to enjoy their free food. They are cutting them off and directing them to evil corporate soup kitchens.
I also read the evil crazy fringe Richmond tea party has sent a refund request to the city for the thousands of dollars they spent on permits, police, and insurance over the past few years to use the park (for three days) that is now occupied. Apparently the peaceful occupy people aren't paying their "fair share" to use the park (for weeks).
The irony seems to grow daily.
"toted" = packed
Toting or packing guns in public is inherently perceived by some as threatening and intimidating. It is different from carrying rifles etc. and walking in the woods hunting.
When police wear guns, you assume that it is for the greater good in order to protect society. When the Tea Party members wore them to public rallies, where people running for office were speaking, in order to protest and furthermore carried signs saying what they did at the time; it was seen as threatening by some Americans. Their message was overshadowed by intimidation. If you disagree that it is intimidating, that is your right. But it is. Otherwise, why wear them and take them?
(ps: And I am a gun owner.)
First JohnBrown, I'm going to
First JohnBrown, I'm going to assume you have been living under a rock for the last 4 years when you committed "what was this bad business decision" because the entire world has been affected by the subprime mortgage crisis that was caused by mortgage backed securities being traded as gold stocks when it was pretty clear they were worthless- if you need facts do a Google search or find a newspaper from the last 4 years it will mention it.
Maybe there is a lack of knowledge about what really happened during the bail out. Maybe people don’t know there was 16 trillion dollars given to banks. Check the Federal Reserve audit, this information is even on fox news.
I think it’s sad how even in Minnesota we are so polarized we can describe our fellow citizens as “self-entitled spoiled brats” and create the image they are no better than rats in the street or violent vigilantes. I could understand if they were protesting against you personally or your interests. However, people who protest the corrupt economic system we find ourselves in do not deserve ad hominem attacks. At least attack their message.
neato
I should stop with the ad hominem attacks because I have been living under a rock and could even find the right information on Fox News. Solid points. Real solid points. I guess you are correct.
Oh, one question though: what does the subprime mortgage crisis or the intentional devaluation of our currency have to do with a new Vikings stadium?
My entire post was not
My entire post was not directed at you brown merely your questioning what the bad business decision was. I wasn't aware there was a past discussion of bad business deals in the context of the vikings stadium I believed it was discussing the protests against the bank's bad business decisions then being bailed out.
People were questioning facts, I gave a few sources-all the main stream media and fox as sources.
The rest is a general inquire into why some seem to despise this movement. I questioned if it is because of a lack of knowledge. I have not seen arguments why the occupy wallstreet message is faulty , but I see arguments against the protesters. I think it's easer to demonize the members then confront the message. Maybe brown you can enlighten me on how the message is faulty- without attacking the protesters or their idiology you may think they have.I hope I can hear something that has more substance than “its class warfare”, which can be used for any event that mentions two citizens that are not completely equal.