Sen. Paul Gazelka, R-Brainerd, doesn’t want to see another government shutdown. In an effort to prevent such closures, he announced Thursday he’ll author a bill calling for a constitutional amendment stating that if budget bills aren’t passed by July 1 funding levels will revert back to the present budget until a resolution is reached.
“I don’t know anybody who thinks this is a good way to run our government,” he said after a St. Paul news conference. “Over the last few weeks all of Minnesota has endured this government shutdown. This impasse hurt our economy. There were 22,000 workers that basically, for a short time, lost their jobs. Many Minnesotans were inconvenienced.
“Today we’re proposing legislation that forever prevents shutdowns.”
Also speaking at the news conference were two other freshmen senators, Sen. Ted Lillie, R-Eagan, and Sen. Ted Daley, Lake Elmo. They were offering similar legislation.
Gazelka said Lillie’s legislation would prevent shutdowns by statute, but choosing that course would require the governor’s signature on the legislation. The rural Brainerd lawmaker said Sen. Daley’s legislation called for funding the government at 90 percent of the present level.
Despite differences, Gazelka said the three of them were determined that a government shutdown never happen again. They agreed to co-sponsor each other’s bills.
Gazelka said Democratic Lt. Gov. Yvonne Prettner Solon introduced similar legislation after a partial government shutdown in 2005. He said he didn’t know whether the governor or Democrats would lend support to the legislation.
“That’s my hope,” he said. “We haven’t had that conversation yet.”
While he said his legislation might take away some of the urgency to strike a deal it doesn’t take away the fiscal responsibility. He said a second reason that would encourage leaders to reach a settlement is the sentiment of the lawmakers.
“We don’t want to be down here all the time,” Gazelka said.
Gazelka said he expected committee hearings to be conducted on the proposed legislation between now and January.
MIKE O’ROURKE may be reached at mike.orourke@brainerddispatch.com or 855-5860.



Comments (14)
Add commentpay during shutdown
It would guarentee Paul that you get to keep receiving your pay.
Constitutional Amendment Routes?
Why is Paul going through the Constitutional Amendment Routes for his proposals, which bypasses the governor to have a say?
California type legislation model?
>Why is Paul going through
>Why is Paul going through the Constitutional Amendment Routes for his proposals, which bypasses the governor to have a say?
Because we have a governor with a recent history of mental instability and alcoholism who publicly admitted he didn't really need to shut down government but did so because he didn't read the proposals of the legislature?
Would someone please keep
Would someone please keep this guy away from our Constitution!
I'd like to see an amendment
I'd like to see an amendment that would require 100% public funding of elections. That would cut waste and give voters their voice back.
Bad Idea
Everyone should call the senator to tell him what a bad idea this is. MN requires us to have a balanced budget - this is just a continuing resolution so legislators don't have to get their job done!!!!
Ditto, Ditto, ---, Ditto, ---, Ditto.
This would just mean that the governor could veto, veto, veto and then not call a special session or the legislature would not have come to an agreement. Nobody would have to take any responsibility.
It would work
Just include in it that the Governor and all legislators forfeit 6 months pay if they don't get it done!
All Mr. Gazelka really has to
All Mr. Gazelka really has to do is work for legislation that does not allow for himself or the other greedy Legislators to take pay during a shutdown. That would definitely prevent another one!
"Would someone please keep this guy away from our Constitution!"
Why Fish, you and your liberal buddies never pay any attention to it anyways!
Since noone else said it, I will
Good job, Senator Gazelka. It's a great goal and I applaude you for attempting to interject some sanity into Minnesota government!!
Where is the "sanity"
...in giving legislators what amounts to a blessing to not have to ever come to agreement on bills?
This would not be an issue if the two parties were not so entrenched in their party platform issues and unwilling to budge from them on a compromise.
This year, that particularly applies to republicans and their soul-selling on the tax issue.
windy
That is an extremely stupid comment. First you blame both parties and then say it is all the republicans fault. No wonder a democrat cannot make up their little minds.