MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — State and tribal officials have agreed to slash the maximum walleye harvest from one of Minnesota's most popular fisheries, Mille Lacs Lake, by half this year.
Fisheries officials on both sides last week agreed to cut the total quota to 250,000 pounds, down from 500,000 pounds last year, Sue Erickson, spokeswoman for the Great Lakes Indian Fish and Wildlife Commission, said Monday. The quota will be cut in half for both sport and tribal anglers, she said. Sport anglers will be allocated 178,750 pounds while Ojibwe bands with treaty rights will get 72,250 pounds.
Studies indicate the lake's walleye population has been declining, and a survey based on netting data last fall suggested that walleye numbers were at a 40-year low, though the total kill by sport and tribal anglers has remained below the maximum targets.
The lower quota will likely result in anglers having fewer walleyes from Mille Lacs to eat, officials agreed, but key details remain to be resolved.
DNR fisheries chief Dirk Peterson said options to reduce the sport harvest could include a combination of reducing bag limits or changing size restrictions.
He said a technical group will develop proposals that will be presented to a group of Mille Lacs stakeholders, probably late in February. The DNR will take stakeholders' preferences into account as the agency develops regulations for the season, which probably will be issued in April.
Anderson said the bands will meet soon to decide how to allocate their share among themselves.
While the fish were biting well last summer, a shortage of smaller walleyes meant anglers could keep relatively few to eat because of the rule that all walleyes between 17 and 28 inches must be released. Peterson said one possible change is a shift to taking fewer but larger fish.
Peterson and Erickson noted that the bands and the state plan to conduct intensive tagging studies on the lake's walleyes and northern pike to get better population estimates. Another study should give them a better idea of whether predation on young walleyes by larger walleyes is having an impact, she said.
Erickson said this is the first time the tribes have agreed to cut their walleye allocation.
"Generally the allocation has trended upward, but in recognition that the fishery isn't doing what we had hoped it would, they're taking a reduction. And hopefully the further studies will help us get a better handle on the problem," she said.
Copyright 2013 The Associated Press.



Comments (19)
Add commentAm I missing something?
Are they talking pounds or tons? I can't believe that MilleLacs can produce 500,000 tons, that 1 billion pounds of fish!
How will they feed their
How will they feed their families? Buffalo is getting scarce.
Put me down for a measly ton.
Put me down for a measly ton.
News Media again?
What is it? Tons or pounds? Lower the salaries, crummy work warrants crummy salaries. Oh no, I'm sorry, they are like our elected officials. The more worthless they are, the more they get.
Doesn't anyone proof read
Doesn't anyone proof read anymore?
Actually I am not commenting on
the issue, just the writing of the content. Something has to be a miss.
What do we expect? It is an
What do we expect? It is an AP article after all.
Corrected
The AP has issued a corrected update of the article.
motleylarry
What a racist comment Larry. Let me guess.....a Family Reunion is a 'dating opportunity' for you?
JohnMary,
stick around and Muttley larry will grow on you.
Muttley larry will grow on you.
Like the flea riddled mutt that's too difficult to train, too pathetic to shoot, and too ugly to give away?
Wow,
Nasty in here. Won't Mom let you boys play outside in the dark?
We just missed your moderation
Grams. We'll be nice now that you are here.
oh no, the race card, wow!
oh no, the race card, wow!
Race Card
As long as we give advantage to one race and not the other we will always have problems.
Education, One student gets in to school lower grades
Jobs, company needs to hirer a certain race
Fishing, One race can spear fish
billdglock " As long as we..."
billdglock, I agree.
Education, One student gets in to school with lower grades because Daddy is a contributing alum. One student gets the answers to the test because the others won't succeed anyway. One student is given brochures for colleges, while the other one is encouraged to just take some vo-tech classes.
Jobs, company needs to hire a certain race... because that's who has always worked there, employees use their friends and relatives as references, and it is assumed that "they" are all on welfare or get some government advantage anyway.
Crime, officer has the discretion to arrest one race because they are probably guilty of something anyway but the good ole boys who are the starters on the HS football or basketball team can just go home and sleep it off. Don't wanna "give" them a bad record.
Fishing, One race can spear fish and build casinos because the "other" race entered legal and binding contracts but when "they" happened to be successful and the newness of a sweet land deal wore off, then the contracts became unfair.
Yeah, until we are all treated equal... there will continue to be problems.
Education - Some students
Education - Some students gain admission to certain colleges
because they are minorities while others with better grades don't. This also applies to athletes at most colleges.
I don't know about the answers to test.
The college brochures/vo-tec. - each student should be given both. As we all know, some students, in fact, many are not college material and would just be wasting time and money in college. Vo Tech school may be a better choice while some are not ready for any future school..
Jobs - besides the obvious "minority hires". The unions seem to hire relatives especially the long-shore unions as well as the trades unions.
Speaking of being treated equal. How about how the private sector has to pull the public sector wagon which is getting heavier and heavier? Why does the public sector get better benefits, salary and pensions while the private sector pays for it?
IDWD
Are you going to still put time on that lake??
I am still the same. I would not give a wooden buffalo nickle to'em!!
The DNR placed their nets in
The DNR placed their nets in the same place they did last year. The problem is that the water level of the lake was down a lot from the previous year. The fish were not in the nets because they were further out from shore.... because of the low water level. If the nets would have been moved out further this last time, they would have netted more fish.