Less than a full week into his second stint as a congressman, Rep. Rick Nolan, D-Minn., is anxious to get to work.
In his first phone news conference with Minnesota reporters, the rural Crosby DFLer voiced a concern that he emphasized during his successful bid to unseat Rep. Chip Cravaack, R-Minn., in November. Congress, he said should spend more time in session. Looking back at his first term in Congress in 1975, Nolan estimated the representatives were in session 48 out of 52 weeks with most of those weeks consisting of four- or five-day work weeks. That compares with the current term with plans for Congress to be working 32 of 52 weeks, with most of those weeks two-day work weeks.
“We’re only scheduled to work 124 days this coming year,” he said. “Congress has to get back into the business of governance.
Nolan’s spokesman, Steve Johnson, said later Monday he believed there were 125 days listed on the House calendar.
Any chance for collaboration or cooperation comes from time spent with committee members getting to know each other and learning where their interests are compatible and where they’re not, he said.
“The Congress is not governing,” he said. “Right now the ag committee should be meeting, looking at a reenactment of the farm bill, looking where money can be saved.”
On Tuesday, Nolan was appointed to the Agriculture Committee, a post he had sought and a panel that he had served on during his first three terms in Congress. He said the Agriculture Committee has jurisdiction regarding the U.S. Forest Services and he wants to deal with a number of trade issues establishing a fair competitive market for those in the forest-related industries. He said he’ll also work for a sustainable food and agriculture policy for the producers of corn, wheat and beans, one that will be more supportive of small and family-operated farms.
Earlier, Nolan had been named to the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee. On that panel, Nolan said, clean air and water legislation and Amtrak legislation all need to be crafted. He said he also wants to upgrade the nation’s “old and crumbling infrastructure,” which include bridges in need of repair.
Fresh off a congressional race in which in excess of $20 million was spent — most of that donated by outside sources — Nolan has pledged to introduce legislation that would provide a constitutional amendment to reverse the U.S. Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision. Although he said he was outspent in both the primary and general election, typically, he maintained the candidate with the most money receives the most votes. Members of Congress, he said are expected to spend about 30 hours a week on the phone asking for money, in addition to conducting fundraisers.
While admitting that a constitutional amendment was a long, laborious process, Nolan said reforms could come quicker if new U.S. Supreme Court justices are appointed.
“This is one constitutional amendment that is very, very possible,” he said. “House Republicans are not very supportive as a group. I’m reasonably optimistic that something can be done here. Sometimes you just have to step up and lead the charge and do the educating.”
Nolan said he didn’t plan to spend 30 hours a week asking for contributions but admitted that one has to play by the rules of the game in order to have enough money to win.
“If I did absolutely nothing, I’d be on the outside looking in,” he said.
The biggest opportunity for federal spending cuts, Nolan said is in the military.
“We don’t need to be the world’s policeman,” he said. “That doesn’t mean we don’t need a strong defense.”
Responding to a question regarding gun control, Nolan said the government should be supportive of mental health care to prevent those rare occasions where people with mental health problems turn violent. He also called for outlawing assault weapons and called for reasonable and sensible restrictions such strengthening background checks.
“I’m a hunter,” he said. “I don’t need an assault rifle to shoot a duck and protect my family. I don’t need a magazine clip with 50 shells in it.”
MIKE O’ROURKE, associate editor, may be reached at 855-5860 or mike.orourke@brainerddispatch.com. He may be followed at www.twitter.com/MikeORourkenews.



Comments (51)
Add commentSadie: "The federal government holds 85%
of student loan debt. The federal government can garnish up to 15 percent of a borrower’s wages, Social Security disability, and Social Security retirement income without a court order. Unlike other debt, student loans can’t be discharged in bankruptcy. Collection charges of up to 20 percent can be skimmed off the top of payments—enough to turn a 10-year loan into a 19-year loan. To say nothing of the lasting damage to a borrower’s credit score, which will make it hard or impossible to get a credit card, auto loan, or mortgage."
Pretty harsh. But there are many options besides defaulting.
Tuition question: Do you think it might plummet without federal loans?
The default rate is the highest it has ever been.
Ahhh, Johan....
you seem to have offended the communists tonight.
Why they want to be some of Obama's slaves is beyond rational thought.
Perhaps that is the reason?
Another P.O.V. - 2nd Amendment
"Conservatives often embrace “originalism,” the idea that the meaning of the Constitution was fixed when it was ratified, in 1787. They mock the so-called liberal idea of a “living” constitution, whose meaning changes with the values of the country at large. But there is no better example of the living Constitution than the conservative re-casting of the Second Amendment in the last few decades of the twentieth century."
Here's a good description of changes to 2A in 2008: "So You Think You Know The Second Amendment" http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/comment/2012/12/jeffrey-toobin-sec...
A liberal communist takover
of the US government could actually be considered an act of war or treason, couldn't it Johan? After all, they want a fundemental change of the nation that is contrary to the Constitution and over 200 years of known law. I don't think Congress or the president or the Supreme Court can change the 2nd Amendment without an Amendment vote by the people. The Lefters bragged about defeating the anti-gay (AS THEY CALLED IT) Amendment vote, at the same time they took the authors to task for wasting time and now one of the FIRST things on their agenda is GAY MARRIAGE! Imagine that!
About 128 million people voted in 2012 and there are close to 100 million gun owners in the US. Obviously a bunch of the gun owners didn't go to the polls. They will the next time,,,, unless the left tries to create a new junta and postpone anymore elections, as Obama hinted he might try to do.
Peace be with you all. Obey Obama!
Wrong again southie
The federal government can take up to 25% of your wages without a court order. They cannot touch social security disability or social security as well as veterans disability pay or veterans retirement pay. You are correct about bankruptcy and collection charges. Also, yes, it will damage your credit score but not enough by itself to prevent you from getting a credit card or auto loan or mortage. There is no such thing as lasting damage to your credit score. You can always build your credit back but it's not easy. Also, since student loan default is such a large problem, a lot of banks and credit bureaus don't really consider it when you are applying for credit. They will tell you that when they pull your credit report and see that everything else is ok. Student loan default means little to banks etc. if the rest of your credit report is great. And yes, you are right, there are many other options besides default including rehabilitating the loan.
Who to believe, Toobin or Jefferson ? Toobin or Jefferson??
Well, Jefferson, like most of our Founders (and most people), was a mixed bag of good and bad. I'm not a fan of his pro-slavery views, not a fan of his not-so-pro-family views, but he was only human. He might have also found the cycle of gun regulation/de-regulation (that commenced following his era) quite facinating. As Harvard lawyers (and CNN journalists) go, Toobin isn't the worst or best (you may prefer Harvard man, Scalia?) But then again, Scalia also flipped to the dark side in D.C. v. Heller, by agreeing the Constitution isn't quite "dead, dead, dead" as a document. Scalia has also admitted that we haven't seen the final word on the 2A matter in the Supreme Court. In other words, it's a live political and Constitutional issue, not settled dogma.
"The Ku Klux Klan, Ronald Reagan, and, for most of its history, the NRA all worked to control guns. The Founding Fathers? They required gun ownership—and regulated it. And no group has more fiercely advocated the right to bear loaded weapons in public than the Black Panthers—the true pioneers of the modern pro-gun movement. In the battle over gun rights in America, both sides have distorted history and the law, and there’s no resolution in sight." (from a good article about the who really has favored gun control throughout our nation's recent history --- The Secret History of Guns: http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2011/09/the-secret-history-o...
If it's any consolation, Johan, most Congress-folk are too spineless to take on the bark of the NRA's/=gun manufacturers' lobby, so it' not a slam-dunk that ANY laws will be changing anytime soon. Private bunkers can relax to threat level blue or green, for a while, anyway.
Why does every
prosecuting attorney drop the "felon in posession or illegal posession of a firearm"charge first?
Sir eyolf, I say we have enough gun laws if only they are prosecuited. I also say that it's not the NRA's job to disarm the nutjobs that the Law Enforcement comunity refuse to prosecute. As for people that don't like others that want to exercise their 2ndAmendment rights I suggest you gather in tall buildings and hope the police protect you. Like Chicago maybe. Average police response time in rural CW and Aitkin County is about 30 minutes so good luck on your next attack.
I forgot eyolf,
"Think about that!" AND, your response was Very Predictable. ........... mmm..
Here is what the founding father's meant
When I read what there was to say here, I darn near wet myself. As a famous man once said, them's what never knew they're history, is doomed to repeat it. I agree Obummer and his Kenyan mafia did commit a coup and here we have them but not even "elected", not really, because of what they say about how the libs and they're agenda.
The founding fathers were immuted and a true construction judge knows them must be taken literal. That is why the people will take back the future but we must be armed with are weaponry!!!! Alex Jones is right on. The Brits have a chip on they're shoulder even since the Boston tea party. Look what happened in Britain after they banned assault weaponry and semi automatic weaponry. Gun crime explodes as does violence in the street and the thuggery. Take over of parliament and revolution in the air. The way to increase gun violence is to take away the guns. If all semi automatic weapons and in fact all guns were taken tomorrow then gun shootins would go through the roof. Those poor children. If they had only been carrying! And ministers and store clerks and kids and teachers and the mailman and all's of us must do are part to carry weaponry to be safe. And these so-called "doctors" must stop asking about are weaponry. If a dr asked about guns this is dangerous violation of hypocratic oath and the constitution and Holy Bible and they should be in prison!
My existence though growtesk to the lib's and democrat party (aka socialism) must be heard! We are the militia!
SMTN
Aitken