Parents of the Wadena-Deer Creek School District students who said their children saw an inappropriate photo of a teacher this fall are upset with the response from the school board and the superintendent.
Linda Johnson of Wadena spoke with the Brainerd Dispatch Monday and provided a copy of a joint statement the parents wrote. Tom VanErp, a school district health and physical education teacher, was suspended earlier this fall without pay for the equivalent of 10 work days for not complying with district’s acceptable use policy for technology. In a statement issued to the Brainerd Dispatch last week Superintendent Virginia Dahlstrom said the basis of the suspension was conduct unbecoming a school employee. Dahlstrom said at that time that no photo was retrieved and the investigation into the matter had concluded.
“We want the school to do what’s right, morally and ethically,” Johnson said by phone Monday. “The school district needs to get that photo. They didn’t do enough.”
She said students reported seeing a picture of a mirror reflection of the teacher without clothes.
A phone message was left for VanErp but was not returned Monday.
Wadena-Deer Creek School Board Chair Steve Techam said he couldn’t comment on the photo.
Johnson said VanErp should not be in the Wadena-Deer Creek school building but stopped short of saying he should be fired.
“We don’t think he should be there,” she said. “They (school district officials) have not done enough. They have been sitting on their thumbs doing nothing.”
Dahlstrom was out of the office Monday and could not be reached for comment.
Techam disagreed with Johnson’s contention about the school district’s reaction, noting school officials had been involved in numerous meetings on the topic.
“I disagree,” he said Monday. “He (VanErp) was suspended immediately. We have worked through a lawyer and we came up with a penalty.”
The other parents who helped prepare the statement were Wayne and Missy Ament of Bluffton, Jim and Tami Mench of Verndale and Joe and Becky Wegscheid of Wadena. Johnson said the parents planned to attend the Dec. 17 school board meeting to discuss the issue.
In the joint statement the parents said their children were exposed to an inappropriate picture and they felt the issue was important enough to pursue.
“A teacher is surrounded by children daily, and as such they should be held accountable to higher moral and ethical standards,” the parents wrote.
They said that while VanErp is now teaching some middle school classes, he is still walking the hallways in the same school building as the students who saw the inappropriate picture.
“The school has not done anything to protect the students from this uncomfortable situation,” they wrote. “They have to see this teacher every day, even though he is now a middle school teacher.”
The parents’ statement said Dahlstrom told the parents school officials couldn’t extract the picture because an iPad has no hard drive and once something is deleted it cannot be retrieved. The parents wrote that a member of their group contacted a state crime services division official and other sources who indicated that data can be pulled from devices that are not backed up.
“Why does a school district use an iPad for their classroom teaching, curriculum and other tutorials and not back up the contents?” they wrote.
The group said it was told by Dahlstrom that there was not enough room on the server for a back-up system.
“We are at the mercy of the superintendent and school board who need to step up to the plate and do what’s right; take responsibility for their lack of leadership in upholding what morally and ethically is right,” they wrote. “The school district has admitted there was an inappropriate photo, what else do they need?”
The parents said in the statement that they had been told the investigation is now closed.
“Shame on the WDC School Board and the superintendent for not stepping up to the plate and not doing what’s right,” they wrote. “What about the rights of the students.”
Techam said no adult had seen the picture in question and the school district had no way of knowing what sort of device it had been taken on. The school district said they sent the iPad to a forensics company and the technology doesn’t exist to retrieve a photo that has been deleted with no back-up system.
The board chair said VanErp had not been the subject of discipline in the four years Techam had served on the board and he was not aware of any earlier disciplinary action.
Techam said he could not comment on the parents’ characterization of the photo.
Johnson said the parents had been in touch with law enforcement on the issue but were informed by Wadena Police Chief Bruce Uselman that because no picture had been sent to anyone that no crime had been committed. Uselman could not be reached Monday to address the issue.
Johnson also contended that the teacher’s suspension had been eight days but Techam said it was 10 days.
MIKE O’ROURKE, associate editor, may be reached at 855-5860 or mike.orourke@brainerddispatch.com. He may be followed at www.twitter.com/MikeORourkenews.


Comments (13)
Add commentPicture
Does anyone know how this was posted? I read a story a few years back, how a girl was mad at her dad and posted pictures of him getting out of the shower. Did the teacher post this or was he set up? Get to the bottom of the posting before getting rid of the teacher.
Good point, lou ...
.. but regardless of who put the offending pic on his iPad the teacher was still responsible for making it accessible to students.
How?
How did the kids know where to find it if the school board can't find it? Did anyone else besides these kid see the picture? In the computer world even if you delete something a computer wiz can retreive it. I deleted some pictures on my laptop that Best Buy got back for me! I would like the full story, before I jump to get rid of a teacher! It take a lot to be a teacher of today!
I'm curious...
Was the iPad his or did it belong to the school district? If the school district, how did the picture get on it in the first place? If it was his, how did the students get their little mitts on it?
There was probably nothing nefarious going on but it sounds kind of dumb for a public school teacher.
I've never used an iPad but it would seem to me that they can talk to each other (i.e. pass pics back and forth). If so, the pic has to exist in one form or another. If that's true, then the technology company should be able to find a way to retrieve it. If they can't, all pornographers will be using iPads. Maybe someone can enlighten me.
I am with you tripwire3,
Can someone let us know!
be careful
Lou and LenDad - with Facebook today anyone can take your picture and upload it without your permission. I have told all my friends and family absolutely no picture of me can be loaded to Facebook, You Tube or any other social media without my permission. I am a very responsible person and sometimes I have fun - clean fun. But any goofy pose can be misinterpreted and I wouldn't even know it was out there.
An iPad gives access to the world wide web just like any computer. It is a computer that looks a little different. There needs to be an appropriate investigation into how and why the pictures were uploaded. I can understand the parents concern but this is also an educational opportunity for the children - especially if the teacher is the victim of someone else's postings.
Put the cart before the horse
“She said students reported seeing a picture of a mirror reflection of the teacher without clothes."upset kids say things that are not true all the time.
“The school district has admitted there was an inappropriate photo, what else do they need?” I did not read in the article that they found the picture...
The school district said they sent the iPad to a forensics company and the technology doesn’t exist to retrieve a photo that has been deleted with no back-up system. But still suspended without pay for 10 days based off of hearsay?
I say....
I say... we have created some questions! (reasonable doubt)
facts
It all started when a mischievious kid snooped on his iPad while he was out of the room. The kid took a pix of it and went straight to the principal. They've seen the evidence...plus, he was forced to resign twice from head coaching positions (football and boys basketball) in the past for issues, so Teacham (SB member) is lying...
Are the parents
insinuating that the children are scarred for life? Did they have permission to view the i pad? It sounds like a lot of history here most are not aware of.