A proposal for Crow Wing County’s future could end two elected positions. Tuesday, Administrator Tim Houle presented a restructuring option eliminating two senior management positions. The proposal eliminates the electorate’s choice for auditor/treasurer and county recorder. Instead, Houle proposed replacing the two elected posts with an appointed administrative services director.
No action was taken by the board as the proposal was discussed during a committee session. Such a move to eliminate the two elected positions requires special legislation and Houle noted that could post a challenge depending on local legislators’ willingness to sponsor the needed legislation.
“This is not about whether the offices should be elected or not,” Houle said, noting other counties are appointing those officials. There are 13 counties out of 87 without a recorder and 11 without an auditor/treasurer, Houle reported. He noted Crow Wing County used to have an elected county assessor, elected court administrator and a host of other elected offices.
“It’s not about whether you get to vote or not,” Houle said. “It’s about how we provide the service and in my mind the elected office should be about where we are setting policy. This is about the administration of policy. This is about making sure a document flows through a system more efficiently than it currently does.”
Houle said just appointing those officials doesn’t get to the main idea of eliminating the multiple offices people need to go to for services such as when a deed is recorded. His reorganization model would break up existing services in newly arranged departments. Houle said he cares about following the customer service and saving tax dollars and whether that is with an appointed or elected official is irrelevant to him.
“If you could tell me that electing every county office would accomplish that fact I’d be advocating for that,” Houle said. “ ... It’s not about elected or appointed. To me that’s a silly little argument. It is about the customer service experience. Can we improve customer service delivery? Can we make that service better and can we make it better and reduce our operating cost at the same time?”
Whatever will achieve that objective, Houle said is in his mind the direction to go and a way of focusing on the big picture.
“Eyes on the prize,” he said. “Customer service is what we are all about. We are here to serve. You must keep your eyes on what’s that customer service experience and because everybody in this county is paying taxes, how can we do that in a most efficient and effective way. The other debate I just don’t think that’s the most interesting part of the question and we’ve heard it before.”
The recorder’s office maintains property records such a deeds and mortgages and probate documents. The county recorder, as registrar of titles, examines documents to make sure they meet legal requirements for transfers. The auditor/treasurer’s office handles the county’s accounting and investments, calculates property taxes and collects taxes, handles licences, coordinates vital statistics like birth and marriage records, and handles elections.
Houle’s proposal would break up the auditor/treasurer’s office putting property records and taxpayer services in land services and putting the accounting and finance under administrative services along with vital statistics and elections.
In Houle’s proposal the county would have four departments — community services, land services, transportation services and administrative services. An alternative name suggested for administrative services was “internal and resident services.”
Houle is convinced there is a net financial gain of about $110,000 with this change.
But Recorder Kathy Ludenia and Auditor-Treasurer Laureen Borden both questioned the cost savings.
The two elected department heads said they first learned of the proposal after a brief meeting Friday and with the Veterans Day holiday had little time to prepare a response or gather research regarding costs and comparison with other counties.
Borden urged county commissioners to really think about the issue.
“It would be a total dismantling of my office,” Borden said. “I’m not sure it would serve the public any better. I think we have very good service now. I feel strongly about the loss of an elected office.
“I think it’s important for the people to have a chance to vote for the people in that office.”
Borden said the elected officials are responsible for their ultimate bosses — the taxpayers.
“We know we are working for the taxpayers and know they have limited funds,” Borden said. “I do like to think they are getting good value for the money.”
Borden has served as county treasurer since 1986 and was elected to combined auditor/treasurer office in 2010. Ludenia was first elected in 1987.
“The idea of losing an elected office is something that takes a lot of thought,” Ludenia told commissioners. “When Mr. Houle says you can save $100,000 by doing this — it’s just not going to happen.”
Ludenia pointed to the annual salary of an average director’s position in the county at $93,000. Borden’s annual wage for 2012 was $85,348. Ludenia’s was $75,316.
In 2012, appointed department Human Resources Director Tamra Laska made $87,521, Land Services Director Mark Liedl made $95,551, Highway Engineer Tim Bray made $90,797 and Houle made $118,135.
In other consolidated offices, such as the county’s land services department, Ludenia said middle managers are making about $60,000 a year. With middle managers in place in the proposed reorganization, Ludenia said the cost savings would be closer to $9,000.
Board Chairman Doug Houge said cost savings aren’t the only goal and the county wants to serve residents as well.
“We’re not acting on this today so there is time,” Houge said.
Commissioner Phil Trusty said the board heard some of the same speeches two years ago and also with combining land services. While there have been hiccups, Trusty said it seems to be working.
“If it’s not, you should be right here telling us,” Trusty said to the gallery, which was largely filled by staff members.
As for the Friday afternoon notice, Commissioner Rachel Reabe Nystrom said there is a kind of a shock to that but these conversations have to start some place. She referred to this conversation as an opening salvo or a book prologue. Commissioner Paul Thiede said it was more like the first manuscript submission to a publisher with the prologue further down the line.
“It’s a big idea,” Thiede said. “That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t look at the manuscript.”
Borden said they weren’t against change. She said: “We want to make sure change is for the better and not the worse.”
No matter what direction the county board takes, Borden and Ludenia would fill out their four-year terms which are up in 2015.
In 2010, Crow Wing County commissioners voted to combine the auditor and treasurer offices, eliminating one elected position. Voters had the option for a reverse referendum via a petition so they could have a say in the matter. But a petition, which had to be completed in 30 days and get 10 percent of voters who cast ballots in the previous election or 3,530 eligible voters, failed to reach needed numbers.
Houle said the county saved $140,000 by combining the auditor and treasurer’s offices and the sky didn’t fall. Concern about removing the elected official he said was a silly little argument
If this early effort has traction, Crow Wing County elected officials would be reduced to the five county board members, county attorney and sheriff. Houle said there isn’t a model in the state eliminating the elected attorney or sheriff and he didn’t intend to suggest that change.
RENEE RICHARDSON, senior reporter, may be reached at 855-5852 or renee.richardson@brainerddispatch.com. Follow on Twitter at www.twitter.com/Dispatchbizbuzz.



Comments (15)
Add commentEfficiency?
Here we have another county administrator & board who really don't how these offices are efficiently run. How much time have the commissioners & administrator spent in each of these offices to see what it's really all about? Let's appoint somebody they want in there who has no real idea about the functions of each individual office to run the show & forget about the employees who have been doing an efficient job for years. Take the public out of it & leave it up to politicians & an administrator who don't have a clue.
Hey Porpoised
Obviously you also don't have a clue. What experience do you have working with these offices? Sounds to me like you're a teapartier at heart. Let's do away with all elected & appointed positions & put a regional commisar in charge.
Waste, waste, waste...
Guess we need to start upping the amount of tickets given downtown to people shopping. Maybe we should make downtown Brainerd 1-hour parking instead of 2? Nevermind, that wouldn't do any good because we'd need people shopping there in the first place.
Cut salaries across the board. If the public are making an average of x-amt of dollars, the people we elect into office should be making the same. Maybe that will get them to actually try for the job creation and prosperity they claim to want.
(I hope they won't have to sell one of their lake cabins to make ends meet next year, those poor souls.)
Tail wagging the dog?
Eliminating elected positions and transfering power to appointed administrators gives votors less control of county government and soon the tail will be wagging the dog.
C-mon Tim Houle
You can do better than that. I thought I knew you. If you think you can save money by eliminating some of these elected positions, just wait till you fill them with union employees instead. By taking it away from the voters, you are opening it up to more union employees. (bad) And then watch the cost to taxpayers go up. You've done a good job up to this point but it's time to slow down. If you need to change something, get rid of the county attorney and make the entire county happy. You know how to do it. Look what happened when you eliminated one of the treasurer/auditor spots. Thanks to the Unions we still have the loser of the election working in the same office and probably making more money now. Not only that, we lost a good employee because of it.
That's my point
Purposed, Maybe I didn't explain it properly. They get rid of an elected (salaried position) and fill it with hourly union position. In other words, Borden beats Erickson, thereby eliminating Erickson's salaried job. We save money. Then Erickson gets her old job back, union deal, and gets as much or more than before (wages, benefits etc. combined). Plus the union gets another mouth back on their team and we can't un-elect a union employee. The taxpayers lose big time. I think the county needs to think a little more before they try that one again. I hope that makes it a little more clear. Sorry.
Purposed
Erickson worked for the county before she was elected to office. Her contract language allowed her to take her job back when she was unelected. She was formerly in charge of elections so when she lost the election, largely because of alledged election fraud issues, she just took her old union job back which was, in charge of elections. Net gain: zero. The poor woman who got the election judge job when Erickson was elected, got booted when Erickson came back. She was union also but it was well known that she was a conservative so it was no big deal for her union to stab her in the back.
Yes, it's Houles job to eliminate positions and reassign the work. Do you actually think reassigning more work to a union employee is going to save money. Dream on. We the taxpayers loose the right to elect our supervisors and the unions gain more work which in their minds means more employees or more money. Now here's an idea. Eliminate some union positions and have the supervisors pick up the slack. Maybe even a little pay raise. That way we could cut back on vacations, holidays, insurance costs wages, etc and just maybe get 6 hours work in a 8 hour day. If not, we can re-elect in a few years. Novel Idea.
Just think, Houle is taking
Just think, Houle is taking the rights of the voters/taxpayers to choose away, and then takes his voter/taxpayer salaried check straight to the bank. Maybe in six months, it will be CWC attorney's position will be appointed, because if Donald Ryan gets beat in the next election, how will he find employment.
Surprise Missionary
The CWC attorneys office is unionized also. No one will beat Ryan anyway. He only makes $110,000 a year and any real attorney makes that much in a month or two. Also, the last time we tried to get someone from his office to run against Ryan, he reminded them that they currently work for him. Some might call that a threat. Eliminating his job completely is the only way to handle him or bring in an outsider. Houle knows how to do it. He's not stupid if he wants. How do you think an attorney in the county attorneys office can get 2 (two) DWI's and still keep his job. He's unionized. Unions protect criminal employees.