ST. PAUL, Minn. (AP) — Minnesota's proposed constitutional ban on gay marriage is history. The fight isn't over for gay marriage supporters, though. The next logical step is the actual right to marry.
Though the ban was defeated by voters Tuesday, state law still prohibits gay marriage. New Democratic majorities in the state House and Senate make it more likely that the 1997 "Defense of Marriage" law could be repealed. Democratic Gov. Mark Dayton, who would have to approve such a change, is in favor of gay marriage.
But Dayton and Democratic legislative leaders played down that possibility Wednesday, at least in the immediate future. The likely new Senate leader, Sen. Tom Bakk of Cook, said policy changes would have to take a back seat to the state budget when the Legislature convenes in January.
"I'm not going to get into this particular or that particular," Dayton said, asked if he would sign a bill to legalize gay marriage.
Despite those cautious words, Democratic Sen. John Marty of Roseville said he'd start pushing a legalization bill as soon as the session starts.
"I just frankly don't want to keep telling people who love each other and who have committed their lives to each other that they can't get married," said Marty, a longtime supporter of gay marriage rights. "To say we can wait a little longer — we've waited too long already."
A few hundred opponents of the ban gathered in front of the Capitol on Wednesday night. Speeches at the rally dwelled more on the victory than battles ahead, but legalizing gay marriage was clearly on the crowd's mind. State Rep. Karen Clark, the Legislature's longest-serving openly gay member, said activists would meet for a Dec. 1 summit to strategize next steps.
As of Tuesday, eight states now allow gay marriage; Maine and Maryland both voted to legalize it on Election Day, and once all the votes are counted, Washington could join that list.
Tuesday's election was a major breakthrough for the cause. Minnesota was the first state ever to defeat a constitutional ban, after 30 consecutive states approved them going back more than a decade. Prior to Tuesday, gay rights activists had never won a statewide vote — the victories were the first concrete proof that national polls showing growing acceptance for gay marriage are starting to bear out in the ballot box.
Richard Carlbom, who led Minnesota's campaign against the ban, said he believed its defeat would make it more difficult to push such measures in other states.
"No one is going to buy into that strategy any longer," Carlbom said.
A one-time Democratic political operative, Carlbom also wasn't ready to endorse an immediate push for gay marriage in Minnesota. He said gay marriage supporters would need time to regroup and decide what should happen next.
"Obviously, this allows the conversation to continue," Carlbom said. "I can't tell you where that conversation will take us."
Matt Jones, a Minneapolis attorney who voted against the marriage ban, said the results of Tuesday's vote should be enough to show Democrats it's time to legalize gay marriage.
"I think there's a great chance and I'll be pushing it on my representatives," Jones said.
But even Democratic lawmakers who strongly back gay marriage rights said there are risks if the party is seen as pushing it too quickly at the Capitol.
Rep. Phyllis Kahn of Minneapolis, who has co-sponsored Marty's past bills to legalize gay marriage, said it runs the risk of alienating moderate and swing voters who think politicians are too fixated on social issues.
"One of the arguments we continually used against the Republicans is they were focusing on social issues and not economic ones," Kahn said. Still, she said, "It's something we have to do eventually."
Chuck Darrell, spokesman for the campaign that tried to pass the marriage amendment, said its defeat shouldn't be read as a mandate to legalize gay marriage.
"When you narrowly defeat the marriage amendment in a blue state, at a time when it's clear we were swimming against a powerful tide that swept the nation as well, I don't see that as a referendum on gay marriage itself," Darrell said. He added that the coalition that pushed for the amendment, made up largely of Catholic and evangelical forces, would fight any push at the Capitol.
State Sen. Scott Dibble of Minneapolis, who is gay, said it was too soon to decide whether to immediately push to legalize gay marriage. But Dibble, 47, had a prediction about himself and his partner.
"We'll be married in Minnesota in our lifetime," he said.
___
Associated Press reporter Amy Forliti contributed to this report.
Copyright 2012 The Associated Press.



Comments (18)
Add commenti can't wait for more social
i can't wait for more social anarchism in MN.. that's what MN nice is all about.. Not having the guts enough to stand up for something, instead there just nice and stand up for nothing
ecocafemx
I couldn't agree more. The fool in the cities heading up the marriage for minnesota effort keeps e-mailing me about celebrating Tuesday evening. I e-mailed back and told him what I thought and yo not e-mail me again. He is responsible for this thrashing.
I really wish that someone
I really wish that someone could tell me what in their life will change if gay people are allowed to marry.
Really
We have nothing more to worry about! How about we not worry about who has the right to marry ( leave the person decide if they want to marry who ever they want)! How many hoops does one have to jump through? 100 years ago a person wouldn't have had a child with out knowing who the daddy was, ( there isn't a law out there to say you have to know)! We are not the judge, believe in what you want, do not pass judgement on your neighbor. What do I care if (Bob and Tom) want to marry, I have enough to worry about like how do I pay for supper or how do I help my nieghbor who is on limited income also. We voted now get on with life and let who ever wants to marry get married!!
LAW
Quoting an existing law is not judging. Gods law is clear and not open to interpretation or popular vote. We have free will and can reject or ignore His law, but that does not change His law. It will take desperate times to wake up America and rid us of liberalism...
Don't equal your God's laws with the state's laws.
You just found out this week, that that is not a winning argument.
I am waiting to see how this effects married couples. Will we see a surge in divorces?
Minnesotans did stand up!
"that's what MN nice is all about.. Not having the guts enough to stand up for something, instead there just nice and stand up for nothing"
Aside from the blatant grammatical errors, this writer is also incorrect in the premise of his statement: Minnesotans DID stand up for what they believed in--fairness, equality, empathy, compassion, love. They stood up for their Constitution. They stood up for the second greatest commandment, "Love thy neighbor as thyself."
I am so proud to be a Minnesotan.
I am glad the amendment was
I am glad the amendment was defeated, but I don't think MN is quite ready to officially legalize gay marriage. In years to come, I think it will become a total non-issue and we will look back and wonder what all the fuss was about. But I think it will take awhile. MN will probably legalize somewhere in the middle of the pack. We won't be among the first, but we won't be the last either.
I'm just glad there is nothing in the Constitution that tells churches/religions what ceremonies they can and can't have and what they can and can't call them. They may not be able to get a MN license yet, but they can still have a church ceremony if their religion supports that. It's not a decision for us to make. Our ancestors came here seeking religious freedom and by voting "no" we honored that.
To boaz1950
You said it all! It is gods law ( the bible law),did you hear it from god himself? Let god decide in the end if ( Bob and Tom) are sinners not the constitution!
Wonderwoman!!!!!!!
Really? You need to ask that question? Just shows how ill-informed so many are around here? Actually, many just want the same rights, not so much the marriage.
Would you let them have same rights? No, probably not, and that is why you likely voted yes, the same way people, not so long ago (1967), would not tolerate interracial marriage and let them have the same rights.
Here are the facts: This
Here are the facts: This was written and passed by legislators who thought they could easily win it - after all it was won in the previous 31 states. Opponents educated voters about how this amendment would hurt thousands of real life Minnesotans. The voters agreed. The people spoke. Let me repeat that: the people spoke. Those who pushed the amendment wanted this to go to a popular vote so that the voters could decide- they did. We elected a new group of democrats this week and defeated this amendment. I think the voters have spoken - and marriage for all couples is what the voters said they want. Now we expect our lawmakers to do what we elected them to do and repeal the DOMA law.
Purposed
don't let the door hit you in the fanny on the way out.
It hurts to realize you have been used
by a party, but that is exactly what Gazelka and his fellow Republicans in the state legislature did. Do you think they are regretting that move? Especially, Paul Gazelka, since he had a rather short tenure as one of the majority leaders?
The voter turnout was superb in Minnesota, thanks to those amendments. Admit it GOP, you made a fatal mistake in thinking Minnesotans would rush out to vote full of enthusiasm in an effort to disenfranchise voters and solidify discrimination into the constitution.
The election results show just how wrong your thinking was.
Ridiculous
I'll bet you same people who think that gay marriage is a sin would have 40 years ago been a champion of making interracial marriage illegal.
Get your religion out of my politics.
Again I will reiterate,
Again I will reiterate, please refrain from pushing your religion on me. Equality for all. Just like my good friend Inconceivable concluded, "Get your religion out of my politics." And Purposed, Utah might be a good spot for you. With all of the Mormons you probably won't have to worry about the "Gay" thing for a while.