ST. PAUL (AP) — Minnesota’s latest stadium snag has the NFL publicly questioning the state’s interest in keeping the Vikings and league Commissioner Roger Goodell is concerned enough that he’s coming for another visit.
Goodell and Pittsburgh Steelers owner Art Rooney will meet with legislative leaders and Gov. Mark Dayton at the Minnesota Capitol on Friday to urge progress on the struggling effort to build a new home for the Vikings. By a 9-6 vote, a House committee struck down a $975 million stadium bill on Monday, dealing a major blow to the team’s decade-long effort to get taxpayer help for a Metrodome replacement.
“A failure to bring this to the floor is going to be perceived by the ownership and other cities as if it came to the floor and it were voted no,” Eric Grubman, the league’s vice president for operations, said Thursday.
The group will meet in Dayton’s office.
“If it isn’t passed this session, the league itself — beyond the Vikings — the league itself has serious concerns about the viability of the franchise here and the future of it here,” Dayton said after a 20-minute phone conversation with Goodell and Rooney on Thursday.
So what’s the harm in waiting another year, after elections are over this fall? Grubman declined to directly answer that.
“It’s easier to answer why it must happen this year. It’s because the Vikings ownership has waited and waited for years. Because if there’s no action taken this year then there’s no confidence it’s worth waiting any longer,” he said. “If that’s where this gets to then Minnesota loses control of the Vikings’ destiny. That doesn’t mean it’s going to go to one city or another, it just means that you can’t count on it.”
Legislative leaders said they were open to meeting with Dayton and the NFL officials on Friday, but Senate Majority Leader Dave Senjem questioned how seriously lawmakers should take the suggestion that failure to pass a bill this year could cost Minnesota the Vikings.
“I think we’ve had this so-called warning around here for five or 10 years, so I’m not sure it’s a threat,” said Senjem, R-Rochester. He later added: “I think the Vikings are probably going to be around another year or so.”
The Vikings have declined to make lead owner Zygi Wilf or team president Mark Wilf available for comment this week.
“In order to buy, there has to be a willing seller. It’s very hard to find owners who are willing to sell,” Grubman said. “The Wilfs, I don’t believe they’ve ever been open-minded to selling. If this fails to get out of committee, then I think they’d be open-minded.”
To becoming the Los Angeles Vikings?
Approval of three-fourths — 24 of 32 — of the league’s owners is required for both the sale and relocation of a franchise. The league’s rules say the NFL doesn’t favor relocation for well-supported clubs, but relocation “may be available, however, if a club’s viability in its home territory is threatened by circumstances that cannot be remedied by diligent efforts” of the team and the league.



Comments (12)
Add commentPretty simple
if you want a new stadium, build it and pay for it.
If Dayton ...
... had any cajones, he'd suggest to Roger Goodell that the league partner with Wilf-man to pay for the whole thing. How multi-millionaires can come here begging for corporate welfare is beyond reason; that Dayton panders to them is a disgrace.
Let the Vikings move
frankly, who cares? I don't.
Pull Your Team
You leagues and owners come here during a financial time when Minnesota shut down its state over out of control spending? You threaten to pull this team if our tax payers don’t contribute towards your profits? Give me a break. Pull your team and get out.
I don't really care, but,
I hope that all of you that want them to move get to pay the extra in taxes that they would have paid.
After next year the Vikes
After next year the Vikes will be gone, then in about ten years the state will pay 5 times the amount they would spend now to get an expansion team
Clueless politians
What is wrong with everybody here? This will be $$$$ well spent. Just look at how much tax $$$ the Vike's bring into the state. If we lose them your taxes WILL go up people.
Getter Done Dems & Repubs!!!!!!
Job creation and job potection
Here is an opportunity to create jobs, protect jobs and maintain revenue streams and yet the decision makers keep stumbling over the party line. Start doing what is best for the State and not what is best for party line interests and investors. Big Boy/Big Girl pants...ya right!
job creation or more welfare
Yes im a life long fan! but i guess i would rather see my money invested in the stadium, to create more jobs,more revenue,a lot better place to watch H.S. tournaments,concerts.its not like the Wilfs are not pitching in to a stadium that will be built in our state and used by us!! and its not just the bar owners around the stadium that will lose business, bars,sport shops through out the state even the multiple charity's that the Vikings sponsor will suffer!! its a chain reaction! or just pump it in to our extremely abused welfare system! just a thought
Yes and No
Yes Vote- Good paying construction jobs, protecting jobs, maintain revenue streams to the tax base.
No Vote- Loss of good paying jobs, existing jobs and revenue streams to the tax base.
Pretty simple, now isn't it?
I find it interesting how
I find it interesting how some of the posters on here, who always compalin about 'socialist' this and 'socialist' that, are in support of the stadium. Amazing how the rules change when billionaire is involved and a leisure activity is at stake.
Yes I find it interesting also
that job creation, maintaining jobs and revenue streams is a "NO" when it has to do with billionaire that is willing to put up close to half of the cost and will be constructed by Union labor. On the other hand...using Chinese construction firms might lower the cost to the point that this billionaire could cover the costs with his contribution alone. Maybe that might be the best solution?