• Overcast
  • 52°
    Overcast

sponsored by Edina Realty

  • Comment

APNewsBreak: St. Cloud district near civil rights deal

Posted: October 25, 2011 - 8:52am

MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — A Minnesota school district must report to the federal government any future allegations of harassment against Somali students as part of a tentative agreement to end a civil rights investigation, the district's superintendent said Monday.

St. Cloud Superintendent Bruce Watkins said all but the final details of the agreement had been reached with the Department of Education's Office of Civil Rights. The deal up for board approval Thursday night requires that the district make its schools more welcoming to Somalis; it finds that the district broke no federal rules in handling previous incidents, Watkins said.

If the deal is approved, it would end an investigation that began more than a year ago. In March 2010, the Minnesota chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations requested a federal investigation into alleged harassment of Muslim students at two St. Cloud high schools during the 2009-2010 school year.

In May 2010, the district's own investigation confirmed some allegations that Somali students were harassed by non-Somali students. However, the district has argued that it responded appropriately. Watkins, who took the job after the complaint was filed, said the agreement doesn't contradict that.

"There are no findings, and by that I mean never has the (Office of Civil Rights) come out with a finding that the district was not in compliance," Watkins said. He said the agreement does not call for the district to pay any fines.

Watkins said the district has already begun making its schools more welcoming to the community's growing Somali population, including changes to the district's code of conduct, curriculum and complaint resolution policies. He said the tentative agreement is an "affirmation" of the district's improvements, and he welcomed the monitoring as a way to prove the schools are keeping their commitments.

The agreement also calls for the district to improve its system for gathering data about incidents involving Somali students and requires the district to share that information with the department's civil rights division, he said.

CAIR-MN President Lori Saroya said her group tried to persuade the district to make changes for a year before taking their complaints to the U.S. Department of Education. Since then, she said, the conditions in the schools have improved for Somali and Muslim students.

"I do feel that once the Department of Education got involved, the stakes got higher and there was more incentive for the school district to resolve these issues," she said. "Our goal is really to help the students and provide a safe, hostile-free environment."

At the same time CAIR filed its complaint about the St. Cloud schools, it also filed a complaint on behalf of Muslim students in Owatonna. That case was settled earlier this year with terms that appear similar to those in St. Cloud.

In that agreement, Owatonna schools agreed to provide the federal government with annual reports for three years. It also required the district to issue an anti-harassment statement to students, parents and staff, and train staff about discrimination.

Jim Bradshaw, a spokesman for the U.S. Department of Education, said the St. Cloud case was considered still open and under investigation. He declined further comment.

Copyright 2011 The Associated Press.

  • Comment

Comments (12)

Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
Vincent
14
Points
Vincent 10/26/11 - 01:01 am
0
0

Where's the equal justice?

If only the Crow Wing County Attorney provided a similar level of consideration towards the vulnerable adults in this county, as the Federal Government and the Department of Education's Office of Civil Rights provides to St. Cloud Somali students, we perhaps might finally have a Country with equal justice for all.

Jeff Czeczok

smartguy
1209
Points
smartguy 10/26/11 - 06:41 am
0
0

did you catch this?

"it finds that the district broke no federal rules in handling previous incidents". So in other words, there was no case - just like in Crow Wing County.

snackfu
17774
Points
snackfu 10/26/11 - 06:57 am
0
0

Don't say that!

Now all of the mumbling mob will call you names!

Don't you understand? They are smarter than the people who have seen all the evidence and deliberated over it! They are smarter than you! Who are you to think there isn't some grand conspiracy afoot? Don't question your betters who are doing battle against a fictitious boogeyman on your behalf!

Vincent
14
Points
Vincent 10/26/11 - 08:40 am
0
0

Iteration for anonymous

Grand Jury's Instructions:

{{The investigation did find four people from Clark Lake Home voted in the 2010 election although their right to vote had been taken away through the court as they were placed in a guardianship.}}

http://brainerddispatch.com/news/2011-10-20/grand-jury-returns-without-i...

4 group home residents had their right to vote taken away by the court and still, no indictments?

Perhaps Ryan would release his instructions to the Grand Jury, unless of course, his instructions are the reason there weren’t any indictments.

In fiscal year 2000, federal grand juries voted to indict a total of 59,472 suspects and chose not to indict 29 suspects only one out of every two thousand suspects was left un-indicted.

A Grand Jury that produces a 'no bill, does so because that's what the County Attorney desires.

Jeff Czeczok

drinker
287
Points
drinker 10/26/11 - 09:32 am
0
0

Apples and oranges

Vincent, your statistics are from federal court not county court. Also Ryan doesn't give the instructions to the jury the judge does. And lastly the fact that they voted against court order as Ryan stated is not a criminal matter it is an election law issue. So you can try to twist everything into a witch hunt against him but you just sound like a whiner.

yeah.. but, but but.....

Vincent
14
Points
Vincent 10/26/11 - 10:58 am
0
0

Guilty as charged, Drinker.

I'll gladly accept the label of 'whiner' when the intellectually challenged vulnerable adults in my community are exploited...for any reason!
I'll wear that label as a badge of honor.

On another note...
Similar to the voter fraud conducted at the CWC Courthouse last October, only with one minor exception...
These individuals apparently weren't court ordered they couldn't vote.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/10/25/voter-fraud-allegations-hit-s...

smartguy
1209
Points
smartguy 10/26/11 - 04:45 pm
0
0

Vincent

and the San Francisco deal proves DOn Ryan wrong because . . . .?

I do find it admirable you are thinking of those who may be exploited. But it appears your worries have festered into all out paranoia.

Vincent
14
Points
Vincent 10/26/11 - 05:32 pm
0
0

Education on Grand Jury Instructions.

Drinker, don't assume...
Dinker, as you stated earlier:
"Ryan doesn't give the instructions to the jury the judge does."
I direct you to the following to further your education...and no charge for this one.

According to Minnesota Rule of Criminal Procedure 18.02(3), after a judge swears in a grand jury he/she instructs the jurors on their "duties," i.e., on what grand jurors do generally.

And according to several reported cases, like State v. Goelz, 743 N.W.2d 249 (Minnesota Supreme Court 2007), it appears that the prosecutor instructs the grand jurors on the applicable law after they've heard evidence in a given matter. That's the usual practice in the state and federal systems.

Dinker, in case you missed it, here it is again:
"the prosecutor instructs the grand jurors on the applicable law..."

Me thinks you concluded a bit hastily.

Jeff

lamigra
4
Points
lamigra 10/26/11 - 06:17 pm
0
0

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ,,

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ,,,,yawn,,,,,ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ, same old same old.

lamigra
4
Points
lamigra 10/26/11 - 07:47 pm
0
0

Nice to see civil rights only

Nice to see civil rights only be available to the minorities. I guess if you are white and harassed its acceptable? Yet another case of the ideas of the %5 outweighing the other %98, because some politician doesn't wanna make the %5 mad,even though then screwing the other %98 is perfectly acceptable. Wow this country is a joke..

drinker
287
Points
drinker 10/26/11 - 08:22 pm
0
0

Assumptions?

Vincent, you posted:

"unless of course, his instructions are the reason there weren’t any indictments."

and,

"A Grand Jury that produces a 'no bill, does so because that's what the County Attorney desires."

And you accused me of making assumptions. Then you go on to prove me correct in your response.

Of course the judge gives instructions, like you are here to listen to evidence, ask questions, ask for more evidence, and most importantly what the burden of proof is for an indictment and/or a no bill. These are your duties ladies and gentlemen of the jury.

The prosecutor instructing what the "applicable law" is is an education to the jurors on what statute is being investigated. You know like were talking election tampering here, not murder, not jay-walking.

Either way it doesn't matter, I didn't make the ASSumption that since the grand jury didn't find what I thought it should that it must be Ryan's fault

smartguy
1209
Points
smartguy 10/27/11 - 06:18 am
0
0

Lamigra

your math doens't add up. Irregardless, our country was founded on the principle of minority rights and the fear of mob rule. The 5% (or 2%?) is relevant.

Back to Top

Spotted

Please Note: You may have disabled JavaScript and/or CSS. Although this news content will be accessible, certain functionality is unavailable.

Skip to News

« back

next »

  • title http://spotted.brainerddispatch.com/galleries/543828/ http://spotted.brainerddispatch.com/galleries/543823/ http://spotted.brainerddispatch.com/galleries/543818/
  • title http://spotted.brainerddispatch.com/galleries/543813/ http://spotted.brainerddispatch.com/galleries/543808/ http://spotted.brainerddispatch.com/galleries/543803/
  • title
Brainerd High School Triathlon

CONTACT US

  • Switchboard 218-829-4705
  • Report News 218-855-5860
  • Advertising 218-855-5835
  • Classifieds 218-855-5898
  • Circulation 218-855-5897
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback

ADVERTISING

SUBSCRIBER SERVICES

SOCIAL NETWORKING