When Brainerd School District voters head to the polls Nov. 8 to vote on the district’s operating levy referendum questions, they won’t be the only Minnesota taxpayers being asked for additional money for schools this fall.
More than a third of school districts in the state will be asking voters for more funds this fall, the highest number since at least 2001.
Greg Abbott, spokesman for the Minnesota School Boards Association, said 133 districts have said they will have levy referendums in conjunction with city or county elections.
However, the number of school levy issues could increase. Abbott says there’s a Sept. 16 registration deadline for districts planning solo elections.
The number of districts with levy elections will be the highest in 10 years. There were 101 levy elections in 2007 and 188 such elections in 2001.
The Minnesota Education Department reports that as state per-pupil funding has failed to keep up with inflation since 2003, schools have become more reliant on local taxpayers.
Charlene Briner, a department spokeswoman, said the high number of levy requests could also be tied to state leaders’ decision earlier this summer to help fill a $5 billion budget hole by delaying payment of about $2 billion in education money.
“I think that’s reflective of the difficult financial situation districts find themselves in,” she said of the levies.
Brainerd Superintendent Steve Razidlo said the large number of districts also seeking local support this year doesn’t surprise him.
“It says a lot about the tough times that a lot of communities are in and the perception held by many school districts that the state has not kept pace with inflation or the local district need.”
Razidlo said there is a growing disparity among districts that are able to pass higher levies, as compared to those that have little or no local funding. He said even if voters in the Brainerd School District approve both levy questions — a renewal of the district’s existing $199.24 per pupil operating levy and a second levy question asking for an additional $200 per pupil — the total $399 per pupil levies are far lower than the state average operating levy of about $936 per pupil.
“In our case here in Brainerd, we’ve tried to look at what we think we need in order to stay as whole as possible,” said Razidlo.
According to the MSBA website, the largest operating levy requests are from some Twin Cities metro area districts, but also many smaller outstate districts.
• Anoka-Hennepin: A renewal of an existing $1,044 per pupil levy, plus two additional questions, one for a capital project levy for technology and a second question for an additional $260 per pupil operating levy.
• Badger: A $500 increase in its existing $1,500 operating levy to $2,000 per pupil.
• Climax-Shelly: A renewal of its $1,931 per pupil operating levy.
• Delano: An increase from $426 per pupil to $990 per pupil operating levy.
• Edina: A renewal of a $400 per pupil levy, as part of its existing $1,800 per pupil levy, as well as a $4.5 million capital levy for instructional technology. According to Edina School’s website, the district currently spends $122 per pupil on technology, while neighboring school districts like Hopkins spends $719 per pupil for technology, Minnetonka spends $655 per pupil, Eden Prairie spends $637 and Wayzata spends $545 per pupil.
• Fulda: A renewal of its $1,901 per pupil levy and possibly an additional $400 per pupil operating levy.
• Northfield: An increase from $1,269 per pupil levy to $1,584 per pupil and a capital project levy renewal.
• Royalton: A $700 per pupil operating levy. There is no current levy in place.
• Steven-Argyle-Central: An increase from $1,000 per pupil to $2,000 per pupil operating levy.
• Stillwater: Three questions that include a $500 per pupil increase to a $1,465 per pupil operating levy, a $982,300 capital projects levy to expand student access to technology and a $18.1 million bond to improve science facilities and update heating and cooling systems.
• Tri-County School: An increase from $800 to $1,200 per pupil operating levy.
• White Bear Lake: A renewal of a $1,580 per pupil levy.
Steve Lund, director of business services for the Brainerd School District, said these figures demonstrate the glaring inequity in school funding. He said Edina Schools are relatively close in size to Brainerd Schools. Edina is seeking to renew $400 of its total $1,800 per pupil operating levy, along with adding another $500 per pupil level of funding for technology, for a combined total excess levy of $2,300 per pupil, compared to Brainerd’s current $199.24 per pupil levy.
Lund said if Brainerd was funded at Edina’s level, the district would have an additional $15 million of annual funding. Edina also has only about $6 million of property, or seasonal/recreational/agricultural properties, exempted from local operating levy taxation. In contrast, Brainerd has about $1.4 billion exempted from local operating levies. This means there are fewer residents — many with lower incomes — than those in Edina paying more for local school funding.
If Edina’s technology levy passes, Lund said that district will receive $4.5 million above its basic funding for technology opportunities for its students, compared to Brainerd’s annual funding of $150,000 for technology.
“However, all students are measured each year by the exact same comprehensive exams,” said Lund. “I completely agree that the state should have uniform student expectations and accountability, but what I have yet to completely figure out in this position is why school districts can’t have the same uniformity in financial expectations to achieve these results. It frustrates me to no end to see this inequity in education funding not only continue, but grow a system of the haves and have-nots in education across the state.”
In addition to Brainerd schools, the Pine River-Backus School District is also holding a Nov. 8 general election referendum. Pine River-Backus voters are being asked to renew a $1 per pupil operating levy so the district can access nearly $80,000 in state equity funds and to approve a $4.26 million building bond referendum used to expand programs and physical space at the school.
This story contains information provided by The Associated Press.
JODIE TWEED may be reached at jodie.tweed@brainerddispatch.com or 855-5858.


Comments (13)
Add commentOne Third?
When a third of our schools feel that its necessary for such referendum votes, that should tell us how out of sync the whole school funding laws are. A good many of the schools (and the proposed Brainerd vote is among them) are simply asking to keep the money they have been getting. There are no other government agencies that have to go through this kind of procedure.
johngait
My guess is you are one that probably spends more drinking in one night then the school district is asking you to pay in one year!
School Funding
I'm happy to see that some are finding the school funding system needs to be replaced. My suggestion is a blue ribbon committee of law makers, educators and parents begin the process. The system has to change as taxpayers are tired of being asked for more and schools are tired of asking for more.
hey bobberhead
I know I spend easily a hundy in a bar when I go out, thats why I go out, to have fun and spend money to local establishments that give jobs to local people. Maybe you should do that too! Or just sit in your home, sipping your green tea from China and sit on your Indonesian couch watching tv from a tv made in Taiwan. I will go drink a grainbelt made in Minnesota, served my a Brainerd citizen.
what johngalt and I do with OUR money is OUR business. I already give that school district enough money and I do not have any kids.
Since you are so willing for everyone to pay their part, I say get out your checkbook and write a check, and while you are at it write it big enough to cover johngalt's and my share as well since you think it is so necessary.
I love people who always know how to spend other peoples money. Are you a democrat by chance
Since you have no kids....
Since you have no kids, (This is for I disagree with dems) then I suspect you would want a rebate if you haven't had a fire and not needed a fire department -- or a rebate if you haven't had any need of the police department -- and SOMEONE somewhere paid for YOU to go to school to learn to use computers and to type and to read. We are all part of the community -- all part of the society. Should we be prudent as citizens? You bet, I wish more were. But we should also realize we are all in this together; no one is exempt from the responsibility of being a contributing citizen in every way.
We are all in this together
Well I'm not. Comparing fire and police protection and comparing raising your kids are two different things. What was is not what is. Did I have a "free" education? As compared to today, I would say yes. But unlike when I was growing up, I did have to pay anything in the way of taxes. Yoday I do and johngalt is right; it is a money pit!
Bringing it to local reality.
with Jesse Ventura (yes, I voted for him, could not stand a politician with the nickname of "Skip",
so I voted to "Skip" this politician or one who had an East Coast accent),
the shift of funds for Minnesota children changed.
It changed from a spread to all taxpayers in Minnesota to a local decision.
The local decision would be?
A static nominal amount of Minnesota State Money would be given.
Anything above that would be the responsibility of the locality of the school district
and the taxpayers, primarily, property tax payers of that education district.
Any one disagree so far. Just take a look at your property tax statements since about
2000 and you'll know. Renters, ask your landlord how much of your "rent" is for property taxes
in the local area. A surprising amount to be sure.
The shift from the State of Minnesota and "all taxpayers" to the locality is
fairly close to completion.
Wait till the homestead credit expires in 2012. No it wasn't snuck in, it
was voted on by the folks currently in the legislature and hoping to be re-elected in 2012.
Yes folks, it's coming. Think it's a joke, wait until the local
units of government give you the "pleasant or unpleasant news", your choice.
Some of us who have not had this tax credit applied for a few years, already
are at full maximum of "taxes endured, and taxes collected". we have a general idea within a
few dollars we hope of the property taxes we'll pay again in 2012 coming.
I will make another comment that Senator Gazelka will try the tried and true
process to bypass the Governor and do another Minnesota Constitutional Amendment or more, but
why point out the obvious. I digress. He's employed a successful "loop hole" and will try
quite a few more again perhaps. The motto? If you succeed once, keep on trying, you'll be
more likely to be successful again than failure. If the Governor has a veto threat coming,
why go down that path?
Private school
That's your right to select private schools; I hope it has worked well for you.... and I will agree wholeheartedly with the first part of your original statement, and I quote, "Spend more time educating the children" ... and I would hope the public schools would indeed spend less time teaching to a test and concerning themselves more with preparing good citizens rather than answer-spewing robots.
I have to question, though.... if its wrong to indoctrinate our students with liberal thought, is it just as dangerous to do the same with conservative thought?
Right you are...
Absolutely .... the kids need to hear it all ... we need to teach them to be independent thinkers and doers ... and I don't think private schools are necessarily as 'conservative' as some paint them to be, and public schools aren't necessarily as 'liberal' as some paint them to be .... in the long run, it is up to parents to solidify the learning, no matter what school their kids go to.
Taxes and kids and cops
Taxes are indiscriminate. If you live in a community, you can expect your taxes go to all the publicly funded entities whether you use them or not. It would be difficult and even economically unfeasible to put user fees in place for every public service. That's how I can say that there is no difference between taxes used for schools, law enforcement and emergency services.