For the past few years, cities looking to cut budgets have been struggling with to maintain the level of services residents expect.
For Brainerd and Baxter, that led to the signing of a service sharing agreement in July that would allow the cities to share staff and expertise as needed. The idea behind the agreement was in light of layoffs in both cities, there was a need to stay functional in case of sickness or vacation time by employees.
That agreement has been utilized the past few weeks as Brainerd building official Tim Caughey, who has done building inspections in Baxter when that city’s building official, Bob Baumann, was on vacation.
Baumann has been Baxter’s only building inspector since June, when the Baxter City Council eliminated the city’s other building inspector position.
“The agreement with Brainerd has allowed us to have no delay or disruption or services despite having gone down to single person for handling building permits and inspections,” Baxter City Administrator Gordon Heitke said.
“The public really shouldn’t have to receive any disruption or delay in services and this agreement allows for no delays.”
Caughey said the idea of service sharing has been discussed for a while but took off after Baxter’s building inspector was laid off. Caughey said he and Baumann met to discuss how inspections would be handled when one of them is requested to go to the other city.
Caughey has assisted Baxter three times since the signing of the agreement, he said.
“It’s worked well for being relatively new,” Caughey said. “I think it’s a great concept that allows us to efficiently utilize staff.
“It’s going to be a great opportunity for the future. I think it’s a win-win situation.”
In addition to Caughey, Brainerd has two other building inspectors. Caughey said when he’s needed in Baxter the other Brainerd inspectors cover his duties. Sharing services is something that’s been done between departments in Brainerd for quite some time, Caughey said.
“We’re all trying to do more with less and this gives us an option to be even more efficient,” Caughey said. “It just makes good sense.”
The service sharing agreement is good for both cities, Brainerd City Administrator Dan Vogt said, but is not unique to just building inspections. One other area he and Heitke has discussed sharing services is in information technology staff.
Sharing services is not a new concept between the two cities.
Examples include Brainerd, Baxter and Nisswa sharing a criminal prosecutor; Brainerd and Baxter sharing in a Wastewater Treatment Facility and water connections; all county police departments sharing in Crow Wing County’s dispatching center; all departments providing mutual aid when needed and belonging to specialized policing units; and Baxter sharing in Brainerd’s fire protection.
“This is a good one and a way to do some more but there’s more of it going on than we often think about because we’ve been doing it for so long,” Vogt said. “It’s become such a standard practice that we hardly think about all the things we share.”
A Shared Services Committee, made up of representatives from Brainerd, Baxter, Crow Wing County, the Brainerd School District and Central Lakes College, meet regularly to explore opportunities for the sharing of services.
“Who knows, it could branch out to many other things we haven’t explored,” Vogt said.
MATT ERICKSON may be reached at matt.erickson@brainerddispatch.com or 855-5857.



Comments (7)
Add comment“Who knows, it could branch
“Who knows, it could branch out to many other things we haven’t explored,” Vogt said.
Like becoming one city?
"In addition to Caughey,
"In addition to Caughey, Brainerd has two other building inspectors."
For all of the building that is going on in Brainerd....insert sarcasm here.
Really?
March 16, 2010 City Administrator memo to City Council:
RE: Building Inspectors
{“Please note that Inspection staff will be directed to become much more involved in many other projects and duties to help improve the community including nuisance inspections. While it may seem as an easy area to cut, the statistics and work load do not correspond with staffing reductions.”}
The citizens of Brainerd have been snowed once again.
Last year the discussion during the Council meeting revolved around cutting one of the Building Officials and Caughey was so adamant his department could not do without all three inspectors. He stressed how important it was they all stay on as they could perform nuisance investigations, which the Community Service Officers (CSO's) generally perform for $8 per hour and, they could catch up on scanning maps that was long overdue.
They thought it efficient to perform low paying tasks while being paid upwards of $60+K annually.
Once again, people need to wake up.
Jeff Czeczok
gotta love the spin.
Brainerd has a surplus so they can sub contract out to Baxter and it turns out to be win/win situation for both parties...I think Vincent might be onto something here?
Baxter might as well consolidate with Brainerd. Baxter would gain administrative, fire, utility services and Brainerd would gain Baxters tax base. Cutting out duplicate services would be a Win/Win for both sides.
Vacation/Sick Time?
Vacation/Sick Time?
Generally speaking, this is/was the catalyst for continuing with three inspectors instead of two in Brainerd.
The Building Department isn’t the only department where this happens.
As far as I know, there aren’t any requirements of city staff/inspectors to inspect within a specific amount of time, so if the city only had two inspectors instead of three, the only downside would be the potential for certain property owners to wait an extra day or two before they could have their inspection requirements satisfied.
However, with three inspectors instead of two, desired vacation time is much easier achieved.
JVC