People who have worked to get off public assistance are now faced with the prospect of a decision of quitting their jobs in order to care for their children.
Beth Wilms, Crow Wing County Community Services director, told the county board, the department is continually updating its contingency plan regarding the state shutdown, which cut off funding to various programs.
One program not considered essential to continue was childcare funding for low-income families and for the transitional year as people move off public assistance with the Minnesota Families Investment Program and into the work force. Gov. Mark Dayton requested another look at child care in regard to a designation as essential services.
“We’ve had several phone calls coming in saying ‘If I don’t have child care, I’m going to have to quit my job,’” Wilms said. “Then the cycle will begin again.”
The county said there are 455 families with the MFIP child care and transition year who are not receiving any funding for child care with the shutdown, Wilms said.
“That’s 639 kids,” she said. “That is a huge impact for us.”
Wilms said the average payment per family is $604 per month. For those on MFIP, the average monthly child care is $846 and for the transition year, the average monthly child care payment is $648.
Wilms reported the county’s out-of-home placement costs are at 53.14 percent of the annual budget at the end of June to be slightly over budget at 3.14 percent.
As of May, the county had 139 children in out-of-home placement for a year-to-date cost of $1.4 million or $248,784 per month. Last year, the county provided for 1,596 children in out-of-home placement for a cost of $2.9 million. On average in 2010, the county has 133 children per month placed outside their family homes at a cost of $244,091 per month.
The county’s 2011 budget for child welfare — covering out-of-home placement — is $1,529,029 out of a total placement costs, which include corrections placements — of $2.8 million. For revenue, the county receives federal reimbursement for various programs and recoups a portion of costs billed to every family with a child in placement. Although Wilms noted the county does collect a portion, many families don’t have the resources to pay.
For out-of-home placement, the county can bill insurance companies, recoup a little federal funding and bill families, but the collection is about 20 percent. The majority of the spending comes from county dollars, said Administrator Tim Houle.
Board Chairman Paul Thiede said as part of the reporting to see what drives the expenditures, in complex issues, and what happens with the other 80 percent.
Not all children in out-of-home placement are eligible for some federal reimbursement because of the family’s income, Wilms said. So in June, the county spent $177,693 in child welfare costs and were reimbursed about $32,000.
Wilms said the department overall is focusing on capitalizing on all the options to be reimbursed, which in the past may not have been a priority for staff. In January, the county listed revenues for child welfare out-of-home placement at $20,269, it collected $141,684 in February, $54,285 in March, $31,315 in April, $106,095 in May and $31,716 in June.
“Billing out our dollars for revenue has to be a priority for us and it became very apparent when we started talking about shutdown and our contingency plan and the ability to bill. Some of my staff was billing at less than 50 percent of the allowable billable time,” Wilms said.
She said her expectation is to be at 90 percent of the billable time soon. Houle said the work was getting done but the question was if the county was capturing all the dollars available for recovery. Wilms said part of the effort is making sure staff has sufficient training regarding requirements for the federal programming and those standards are used with all the families.
Chairman Paul Thiede said it is a complex issue but advocated making it as clear as possible for people.
“I don’t believe there is anyone who wants to say we don’t have a focus of child welfare,” Thiede said. “I think the taxpayers would agree that’s what we want to do, but monitoring how the dollars are spent and what we are getting for the dollars we are spending.”
County Attorney Don Ryan said he didn’t want his comments to be interpreted as being against tracking the money or being efficient and effective as possible.
“To some extent you are asking Social Services to control something they are not in control of,” Ryan said. “They can’t control the number of abused children that show up on their doorstep or every month. Just like I can’t control, or the sheriff can’t control, the number of people who decide to get drunk and drive their car or beat someone under the bar. So it’s a cost driver that you are not going to be able to get a grasp on.”
Ryan said the county has worked hard and he advised the board to continue on its path. Sometimes it’s really easy, in these economic times, to get caught up just in the dollar amounts, Ryan said. “We’re still talking about kids.”
Thiede said he didn’t want his comments in any way shape or form to be construed as trying to control what welfare was doing.
“That’s not my issue whatsoever,” Thiede said. “There are many times where there is a judgment call made that’s the reality of the world we live in. That’s all I’m looking for is accountability on what we are doing. ... I just think we need to be sure what we are doing is the right thing.”
Wilms said an updated contingency plan and discussion on funding is planned July 19 at the board’s Committee of the Whole meeting.
RENEE RICHARDSON may be reached at renee.richardson@brainerddispatch.com or 855-5852.



Comments (20)
Add commentHard times
are being faces daily by many people, not just the so called poor. I say anyone who quits their job to take care of the children, because they are not getting a government check, should be immediately removed from the welfare list.
Gov. Dayton
At least he isn't taking his paycheck like others, while others go without so should the government maybe then they would get their stuff together fast, while people go without they go with.Hum something is wrong here.
We elect candidates based on
We elect candidates based on their campaign "promises". Both sides are trying to do what they feel is the best for the people who sponsor them so they can get re-elected. Whoever backs down now will never be re-elected. There will only be one winner. Major compromises, I feel were out the window once the state did shut down. So the state will stay closed until one side says "uncle".
Can anyone explain this to me?
["Wilms said the average payment per family is $604 per month. For those on MFIP, the average monthly child care is $846 and for the transition year, the average monthly child care payment is $648. "]
You missed the point
You missed the point pdnet. It's not as if people are quitting jobs to stay home to take care of children so they can get a government check. They don't get the government check. The DAYCARE PROVIDER gets the government check. So if the daycare provider isn't getting a check from the government to pay him/her for providing daycare for that child, here are his/her options:
1. Provide daycare for free (not a good idea for any business operating to make a profit).
2. Tell the family they need to pay cash for the entire cost.
If the daycare provider chooses option 2, then the family's choice is:
1. Pay the entire cost of the daycare.
2. Pull the kids out of daycare.
Now logically, if they had the resources to pay the entire cost of daycare, they wouldn't be on public assistance, so I'm guessing the people we are talking about can't choose option 1. So they have to instead pull the kids out of daycare.
So now they have another choice...they can either:
1. Stay home with the kids and probably lose their job because of it.
2. Leave the kids at home alone.
Do you really advocate that these low income families (some single parent households) should really leave infants, toddlers, and pre-school aged children home ALONE for 8-9-10 hours per day just so they can keep their minimum wage jobs? Not everyone has a network of friends, neighbors and grandparents handy who are willing to commit to providing free babysitting you know.
Do you have any idea what daycare costs? When my kids were in, it was over $500 per month per child. Not many minimum wage jobs can support that after rent and groceries and gas for the vehicle is paid. No wonder so many are on assistance.
johngalt
"Gov. Mark Dayton requested another look at child care in regard to a designation as essential services."
According to the article it's not Gov. Dayton who is holding up the show on this one.
"here are his/her
"here are his/her options:"
Oops...left something out.
DON'T HAVE CHILDREN IF YOU CAN'T AFFORD THEM.
Wolfg1 - I'd love to live in your perfect world
Wolfg1 - I do somewhat agree with you - It'd be wonderful if people didn't have children until they could afford them.
But life intervenes --- perhaps the parents were financial secure when the child was born but circumstances later changed, perhaps the child was born a few years earlier than planned, etc.
Child support payments allow the parents to have the dignity of work and perhaps to improve their skills and their financial situations.
Oak,I understand the
Oak,
I understand the variables and changing circumstances, but there are many folks who simply do not plan the way they should.
Wolf
I agree that there are those out there that have children on purpose with absolutely no financial resources to support them.
However, I don't believe that is the majority of people we are talking about here. With the recession and record unemployment some families who used to sit pretty well financially have found themselves laid off and having to take entry level or minimum wage jobs. They have a house and kids they USED to be able to afford, and now they can't. The house they can try to sell, but what do they do with the kids?
And yes, it would be nice if fertility was only in service when one's finances were in order. But that's not the case. Babies happen, even for couples using birth control. In my case, we had 3 unexpected surprises, with 3 different types of birth control, used correctly. Thank goodness we were able to make it, but it was tough. Sometimes life just happens despite our best laid plans. That doesn't make it OK to neglect kids just because we didn't plan for them.
Technically not an option
Oh, and technically your idea of "don't have kids until they can afford them" is not an option in this case, because we are speaking of families that already have daycare aged children. It's a little late for coulda/woulda/shoulda.
Hindsight is 20/20, but we have to deal with what's in front of us today. Can't put the kids back in there, you know.
You all missin the point.
The govener wants every one to pay the same tax rate. The republicans and the rich do not care about the poor. If the govener gives in to the replublicans and the rich you will lose
what you are crying about anyway. The republicans and the rich are not being affected at all. They want the poor to suffer.
babysitting
Why are taxpayers paying that much for child care ? How much do these people earn? I hope it is not the same
or less than the child care payments.
Solution could be that these families get together and organize
their own bartering. Babysit for each other. Time to call on family, friends, neighbors to find a solution for each other.
If they want it bad enough they can do it. This will not help
the child care provider, but the familes may find a way to pay
some.
Ever since I heard a young single mother say that she leaves
her child at free child care while she goes to the beach, I
have been irritated at this program. She has a mom and dad
that she lives with which makes it worse.
What do all the rich democrats want? There are many of them that are silent.
Difference between Babysitting and Child Care
Daily care for one's children while one is working is called "Child Care". Occasional coverage while one is out running errands or out socializing is called "Babysitting".
All working parents deserve the choice to place their children with a professional childcare provider.
And employers deserve employees who are comfortable with their childcare arrangements.
sadie
That should annoy all of us when people abuse programs. I say report it.