In an effort to use all federal money allocated for the College Drive reconstruction, the College Drive project management team on Tuesday recommended an additional $1.5 million in options for the project.
The options include:
Building out the intersection of Crow Wing County Road 48 and College Road in Baxter to include reconstruction, extended lanes and widen to the north in Baxter, a new signal system, storm sewer improvement and a dual left onto College Drive.
The estimated cost of the option is $1,087,000 and would be funded through $736,000 in federal funds, $256,000 from Crow Wing County and $95,000 from Baxter.
Using federal funds to pay for 80 percent of the estimated $169,000 cost for corridor lighting for College Drive. Federal money would cover about $114,700 and Brainerd Public Utilities would pay about $54,300 for the lights.
Additions to the intersection at South Fifth and Quince streets to include replacing pavement from Quince Street to Business 371/South Sixth Street, replacing the pavement of South Fifth to Pine streets and mill and overlay of South Fifth Street from Pine to Oak streets.
The estimated cost of that option is $314,200, with federal funds picking up $213,000 and local state aid picking up $101,200.
If approved by the respective units of government, the total cost of the project would go from about $6.9 million to $8.4 million. About $1 million in federal funding wasn't being used.
The proposals were offered by the project management team Tuesday. Members of the team include city staff; Brainerd City Council members Bob Olson, Lucy Nesheim and Bonnie Cumberland; and consulting engineers. Several others attended Tuesday's meeting, including public utilities staff, Central Lakes College and Brainerd High School representatives, affected property owners and other members of the public.
The options will be considered by Baxter and Brainerd city councils on Tuesday. Rob Hall, Crow Wing County assistant highway engineer, said reconstructing the intersection has long been in the highway department's plans.
Ron Bray of WSB and Associates, the city's consulting engineer on the project, noted that the three proposals would put the total project about $130,000 over the $4,334,300 in federal funding available. An option could have been removing the street lights as an option and having public utilities pick up the total cost, but the management team instead approved all three options in hopes that bids from the project cost will come in lower than expected. If not, he said the lighting could be pulled out of the project.
"Needless to say, if we expanded the project I'll say we'd have no problems spending the federal money," Bray said.
"I'm not commenting," quipped Olson, which elicited laughs from those in attendance. Olson voted against the $6.9 million project because of its steep cost but with its approval has vowed to work to make it the best project possible.
Nesheim said one thing that hasn't been stated is the jobs and benefits to community vendors the project will bring.
"This is going to be a big benefit to the community," Nesheim said. "You have to look at that, too." Olson agreed with Nesheim.
City Engineer Jeff Hulsether said staff and the consulting engineers have used conservative cost estimates for the project. Being the biggest project scheduled to start in 2011 in central Minnesota he believed the bids would be favorable to the city.
"The last I think we want is to tell the council that we got a $6.9 million project, go out for bids and come back at $7.4 (million dollars)," Hulsether said.
In a split vote Dec. 6, the Brainerd City Council approved the $6.9 million College Drive project to include four lanes from Crow Wing County Road 48 to South Fourth Street; roundabouts at Mississippi River Parkway, Southwest Fourth Street and South Fourth Street; a stop light at Quince and South Fifth streets; trails; sidewalks; bridge improvements; pedestrian crosswalks, flashers and deterrents; and a backage road to accommodate the apartment buildings.
On Dec. 15 the city was served with a notice that the owners of the Colonywood Apartments along College Drive intended to appeal in district court the validity of a petition the city received for the project from Central Lakes College administrators.
The project schedule includes council consideration of the scope on Tuesday, having the project design back to the city council by the second meeting in March, right-of-way and other documents approved by April 15, bid the project in late July with construction starting in September. A majority of the construction, with the most traffic impacts, is expected to be in 2012. Completion is tentatively set for November of 2012.
Hulsether said eminent domain documents have been filed and are being served by City Attorney Tom Fitzpatrick. Bray said the filings were not done to be hostile but only to make sure the city meets the April 15 deadline for obtain right-of-way for the project. He said the city will continue negotiating with property owners.
MATT ERICKSON may be reached at matt.erickson@brainerddispatch.com or 855-5857.


Comments (12)
Add commentThis is the stupidest thing
This is the stupidest thing that the council has approved. Now they want MORE money???? We don't need to do anything on College Drive except maybe put down a little salt/sand once in a while so no one ends up flipped over on the road or floating in the Mississippi. All they need to do is maybe repave the damn road and leave it alone...
Test
Test
the drug is money
this town is drunk on public spending-now another 1.5 million we don't have making 8 or 9 million total-would the last taxpayer to leave turn out the lights! look at foreclosures,look at your unemployment,look at the lack of jobs and this is your vision for job growth!
"In an effort to use all federal money"
This is the most foolish statement imaginable. The Fed is broke and cannot afford to spend more money, especially on projects that add options just to increase "our share". Government at all levels needs to start looking at money and budgets the way the average citizen does. We are the ones you come to, demanding more, when you are fiscally irresponsible. And because governments have tapped this well so many times, we have neither the resources nor the will to keep bailing them out. Live within your means. If you want or need something, allocate funds and save toward it. Stop this madness!
to the city council members that want this
remember, you are all getting voted out because of this. I will do my part, who is following my lead on this.
You are all ignorant and are acting like the feds. What part of "We dont want anymore needless spending" don't you get?
Enjoy it while you can.
"Needless to say, if we expanded the project I'll say we'd have no problems spending the federal money," Bray said.
Yea, let's spend every dime possible. Let's take everything we can from the tax payers pool. Forget about leading by example and doing with less. These people are fools. Enjoy your elected positions today. I look forward to the uprising in voters to remove you.
Pedestrian crossing?
How do they plan to allow for Pedestrian crossing in the area of the apartments and the college? The area where there was a fatal is three lanes wide. If they need to cross a five lane roadway it will really be bad. There is a Pedestrian signal in St. Cloud on Division St. Maybe they should look at it.
Excellent!!
I'm so happy to see that the City of Brainerd is doing so well financially that they can keep spending money on nice amenities. Sooner or later I'm sure that State leading unemployment number will come down as soon as people figure out that Brainerd won't hesitate to spend, spend, spend on secondary projects. Don't let those Federal dollars slip away because you don't want to lose them.
Good Forward Thinking
Early investments for the future will pay off in the long run. It makes no sense in construction to revisit projects every 5 to 10 years. Build it now to accommodate the next 20-30 years of growth. The cost is cheaper now and there will likely never be this level of inter-governmental collaboration again.
{There is a Pedestrian signal
{There is a Pedestrian signal in St. Cloud on Division St...}
hein1ric, I've asked about this during the last 2 PMT meetings.
They talked about the system in St. Cloud...it's called a 'HAWK' and it's a pilot project with the jury still out on it.
It's very expensive, about 3 times as much as the flashing yellows.
There'll be 2 pedestrian crossings between the college and the apartments with flashing yellow lights...the college is covering the cost of these.
I don't believe there is any safety for blind people with yellow flashers and I pity the blind student left having to navigate across with the flashing yellows as there only protection.
Jeff
hey herc
Actually who I blame is people that talk a big game and do nothing about getting votes to remove certain ones from office. Also the losers of the election not going after the prize more.
Most people my age do not come on here to chat and argue and nearly every one of my friends did not know how to vote and wouldnt have voted if it wasnt for me educating them.
Candidates did not do enough educating of the younger generation of voters. You need to educate the 18-35 year olds because they are the ones that have no clue on how to vote in the city because nobody talks to them. And I will bet that NONE of them voted for the city elections at all.
I didnt vote for the money pushers, I pushed against them. I had a very heated converstion with an alderwoman and she lost my vote 2 elections ago.
Maybe more people should do more pushing. I did as much as I could and I am gone 90% of the fall. Nor did I vote that way last year. In fact, I tried to make conversations every time I was at my favorite watering hole to push the issues the last 2 years. Never once did I ever hear anyone else bring any of that up.
How do we educate the younger generation? Maybe start there. I do my part, do you do yours?
Since you point me out Herc, how many younger voters did you get to go and vote?
Would the public have known?
I believe it highly likely the public wouldn't have been made aware of the additional increase to the total cost of the project if Alderman Olson hadn't brought it up.
The fact that with the inclusion of the items they're using to capitalize on all the federal dollars available, and how the project was approved for $6.9 million and how the other entities were approving their share, not one person around the table even suggested the increase in the total cost of the project.
One little item Matt Erickson left out was how Olson said the figures show the cost has increased approximately $1.5 million.
The consulting engineer half heartedly challenged Olson by saying the "core project" is $6.9 million.
Olson stated that we need to be up front and not try to fool the public and say the project is $8.4 million , not the 6.9 million.
I can only assume it would've been reported as $6.9 based on the Dispatches favoritism towards the project and how the Dispatch reported $6.9 million on Tuesday related to the presentation provided to the School Board on Monday.
Jeff Czeczok
Greed making decisions?
Just recently city officials were turning off street lights to save money. To spend $169,000 for corridor lighting on a questionable project would certainly give them more lights to turn off. The prospects of "Free" money seems to short circuit common sense.